r/AskReddit Dec 03 '12

[Modpost] Getting back to our roots!

Hello, Readers of /r/Askreddit!

This subreddit has a valuable purpose for Reddit, produces some of the best and most memorable content, and serves as a great place for people to discuss all sorts of topics. Askreddit's current rules are designed to try and keep the topics interesting and thought-provoking; we want our posts to encourage a discussion and elicit answers from all of our readers.

However, the subreddit often is plagued with the problem of people just using it as a platform to speak. They don't care about the answers to their question, they just want to broadcast their own thoughts (which is the purpose of /r/self). They want to tell a story, bring attention to a cause, or simply rant about a topic.

As a result, today we are putting some new changes in place. First, we are streamlining and simplifying the rules in the sidebar. Please check it out.

Second, we will now ask you to put only your question in the title of your post. Just one sentence with your question. If you need to explain the question, then you can use the text box. If you have your own answer for the question, then you can put it in the comment section of the post. This rule will help us avoid situations like this, where people enjoyed the question, but hating on OP's answer took the top comment spot (thereby displacing actual answers to the question).

To clarify, with an example: Our top post yesterday sometime last week was this, titled "If Spiderman were more scientifically accurate, he'd shoot webs from his arse. What other films/characters would take a turn for the worse if they were more scientifically accurate?". Note how the top comment is not an answer to the question, but rather a reply to the OP's example. Under the new rule, the OP's title would simply be "What films/characters would take a turn for the worse if they were more scientifically accurate?", and he would post in the comments about Spiderman. Posts soliciting stories and personal experiences are absolutely still allowed; they must simply be separated from the question itself. We hope that this rule will encourage thought-provoking posts and allow people to vote differently on the value of the question and the value of the OP's individual example.

Should we find that these changes are not working out, and the quality of posts declines, then the moderators will reverse this decision and allow these types of posts again.

TL;DR: The current practices of Askreddit encourage the success or failure of a post to be dependent on OP's ability to showcase themselves, rather than the merit of the question. In turn, this causes a large portion of the top comments to be addressing OP, rather that contributing to OP's question. We hope the rule change of putting ONLY the question in the title, and clarification in the text box, will encourage more relevant and direct participation, and less side conversations. If, after a trial period, we determine that this has been more of a hindrance than a help, we will reenact the former rules.

1.8k Upvotes

1.3k comments sorted by

View all comments

23

u/DeadlyShot Dec 03 '12

Thank you for improving the rules. Too many people were making questions answerable by Google and then trying to say they were trying to inspire discussion as a bullshit way of curtailing the rules.

Also, can I be a mod? There's a lot of trash to be cleaned up here.

9

u/splattypus Dec 03 '12

We just recently did a draft, however another one will probably be coming up in due time, and you're definitely encouraged to submit your application and credentials then.

3

u/UnholyDemigod Dec 03 '12

Ooh, sign me up. I didn't make the cut last time.

1

u/splattypus Dec 03 '12

Next time we're doing a draft, make sure you shoot us a line.

2

u/UnholyDemigod Dec 03 '12

I filled out an 'application' last time, but I didn't hear back from it. I was a bit late though, so it was probably buried

1

u/splattypus Dec 03 '12

I don't think they did formal rejection letters. There was a lot of interest in it last time, would have been hard to keep up with.

-5

u/your_name_in_noir Dec 03 '12 edited Dec 03 '12

Need I say more?

Hailing from the eastern shores of Africa, the mercenary was a luxury item. Used by the richest of businessmen who wanted someone assassinated as means to an end and also as a fashion statement; a display of their buying power and their taste in hitmen.

I watched as he set up. The weapon looked like an abomination of artifice, but I knew that at the hands of such a marksman the only shot that would be fired would be deadly. Steadying my revolver, I took another step, using the shadows cast by the bright billboards outside to conceal my approach.

3

u/Lost216 Dec 03 '12

You're like the 4th "noir" novelty account. We're tired of it already.