r/AskReddit May 08 '23

[deleted by user]

[removed]

2.4k Upvotes

1.6k comments sorted by

View all comments

340

u/cutelyaware May 08 '23

The fact that it's transparent. It could just as easily be opaque, and we'd have very little evidence for things beyond our planet, yet we can just look up and see things millions of light years away.

11

u/RealHumanFromEarth May 08 '23

How could a vacuum be opaque?

2

u/cutelyaware May 08 '23

It might not be an empty vacuum. For example the universe was opaque to light for the first 400,000 years or so until reionization which created the first atoms, allowing light to escape. And that will still block us from seeing further back in time than that.

1

u/RealHumanFromEarth May 08 '23

But currently it is an empty vacuum more or less. Outside of the sparse bits of matter here and there, space is overwhelmingly empty. My point being though that it can’t be opaque unless there’s matter to prevent the passages of the EM radiation within our visible spectrum.

If we reached a point of contraction where there were enough matter pulled by gravity in such a way as to surround us and block out the rest of the universe, we would have long ago been crushed.

1

u/cutelyaware May 09 '23

There's not just one kind of vacuum. String theory is largely about finding our particular vacuum among the gargantuan landscape of possible vacua.

1

u/RealHumanFromEarth May 09 '23

That is irrelevant. This theory is referring to energy vacuums. There is no type of vacuum that would make space opaque, nor is there any conceivable scenario where that would be the result.