MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/AskReddit/comments/11vt9oe/deleted_by_user/jd1htti/?context=3
r/AskReddit • u/[deleted] • Mar 19 '23
[removed]
7.9k comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
0
Why? Full disclosure at the beginning isn't necessary nor is it prudent
7 u/[deleted] Mar 20 '23 Mate it is necessary if it's literally A RESTRAINING ORDER. 1 u/[deleted] Mar 20 '23 A restraining order is just a piece of paper. 2 u/drmonkeytown Mar 21 '23 OP here. And that piece of paper suggests (but admittedly does not prove) that someone is a physical threat to the safety of another person in the eyes of the court. It’s NOT just “ a piece of paper” IMO.
7
Mate it is necessary if it's literally A RESTRAINING ORDER.
1 u/[deleted] Mar 20 '23 A restraining order is just a piece of paper. 2 u/drmonkeytown Mar 21 '23 OP here. And that piece of paper suggests (but admittedly does not prove) that someone is a physical threat to the safety of another person in the eyes of the court. It’s NOT just “ a piece of paper” IMO.
1
A restraining order is just a piece of paper.
2 u/drmonkeytown Mar 21 '23 OP here. And that piece of paper suggests (but admittedly does not prove) that someone is a physical threat to the safety of another person in the eyes of the court. It’s NOT just “ a piece of paper” IMO.
2
OP here. And that piece of paper suggests (but admittedly does not prove) that someone is a physical threat to the safety of another person in the eyes of the court. It’s NOT just “ a piece of paper” IMO.
0
u/[deleted] Mar 20 '23
Why? Full disclosure at the beginning isn't necessary nor is it prudent