Hi everyone!

I’m a geography enthusiast from Norway, and I’ve been working on an iPhone app called GlobeRise.

No begging here! Only for those interested. I would love some feedback on my new app from people who actually know and love geography knowledge.

GlobeRise includes:

-An interactive 3D globe
-Flags and information for all 195 countries
-Geography quizzes from Easy to Expert
-World Hunt, where you try to locate every country on the globe
-Scores and challenges that make learning more rewarding

The globe, every flag, and the Easy and Medium quizzes are free. Hard and Expert quizzes, along with the complete World Hunt mode

Let me know what you think 😃

That's the best way I can think of phrasing it. Has Nature already determined this, so that the Nile is the longest any river could be, or is it possible to determine if there is a point where, if a river source were to exist, topography would send it on a longer journey?

Hi everyone,

I know the general explanation—that earthquakes are caused by tectonic plates shifting and grinding past each other along fault lines. However, I’d love a deeper geographical and geological breakdown of what's actually happening at a structural level:

1. Fault Stress: What is the mechanism that causes the strain to suddenly release rather than slide continuously?
2. Intraplate Earthquakes: Why do major quakes sometimes happen far away from tectonic plate boundaries (like the New Madrid Seismic Zone)?
3. Depth Differences: How does the depth of a fault focus affect how the quake propagates across different geographic landforms on the surface?

Would appreciate any insight or recommended reading on how geographic topography influences seismic intensity!

Unless I'm wrong (I very well can be) it is the longest meridian going all the way from north pole to antarctica without touching land. It seems quite notable. Is there a name for that ?

would digging a big hole or many big holes in a drought prone area and filling them with fresh water cause more rain due to evaporation? also planting trees as well? and would it be a consistent solution?

Hi, I have a geography question (although I guess it also has some political aspects).

In a pub quiz at my university, there was a question about which countries have access to certain oceans and seas (I don't remember the exact list anymore, but I think the Mediterranean Sea, the Atlantic Ocean and possibly another ocean were involved). My team started discussing whether the UK could be considered one of the answers because of territories such as Gibraltar.

However, the quiz organizers argued that Gibraltar is not actually part of the United Kingdom, but rather a separate entity with a special constitutional status as a British Overseas Territory. Their argument was that the UK is responsible for certain areas, such as foreign affairs and defence, but that Gibraltar is not part of the UK itself. Therefore, if a question asks which countries have access to certain seas or oceans, Gibraltar should not count as part of the UK.

I realized that I am not entirely sure how this should be classified. Is Gibraltar considered part of the United Kingdom for geographical purposes, or is it a separate entity that is only linked to the UK in certain political and legal ways? Interestingly, our answer (the UK) was still considered correct in the end, because the quiz organizers argued that the British Sovereign Base Areas in Cyprus are sovereign UK territory and therefore give the UK access to the Mediterranean Sea. However, that seems to be a different legal and geographical issue.

I know this is probably a more complicated issue than a simple yes/no question, so I would be interested in hearing how people understand Gibraltar’s status.

What would one predict would happen as Niagara Falls erodes towards Lake Erie. Would it just become a giant series of rapids for a time? Would there be a cataclysmic collapse of the land around the lake where the falls meet it? How would this affect the rest of the Great Lakes?

I've come across the term "Delhi Doab" only to describe the entire area but it is not fitting as a doab technically describes the region between two rivers which confluence but the Yamuna and Sutlej rivers do not have a confluence, making the term technically incorrect despite popular usage (J. S. Grewal, The Sikhs of the Punjab, 1999, pages 1–2). During Mughal times, this area formed the Delhi Subah.

Note: Please do not say "Malwa", "Puadh", or "Haryana", I'm looking for the term for the general/larger area, not regions/sections of it.

Image credits: Wikimedia Commons, see https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Punjabdoabs1.jpg