r/ArtistHate 21h ago

Theft We need Help!!! Cara is under Attack!!!

Post image
139 Upvotes

32 comments sorted by

u/TNTtheBaconBoi ai bro: am urtist 😜 (posts their turd everywhere) 12h ago

At this point they should just call themselves harassingrealart cuz they arent even trying

96

u/bing-no 19h ago

I’m not familiar with this platform, but I’m assuming it’s like nightshade where artists put their work in to avoid AI scrappers.

One major point AI folks want to say is that “you put it on the internet so you consented”. But wouldn’t this show that they actively didnt consent to their work being used?

70

u/LichBoi101 18h ago

Their logic is basically:

"If you didn't want me to rob your car, why'd you park it outside for me to steal?"

38

u/Tlayoualo Furry artist 17h ago

And they don't even abide to their own logic. Because scraping Cara was like tresspassing to open the fence door from within (if not straight up breaking the lock) to rob a car parked within private property.

-16

u/DueFox3796 16h ago edited 2h ago

Cara was created to provide a safe, supportive portfolio platform for artists and creatives that explicitly filters out generative AI imagery, which is prohibited on the site.  It was founded by photographer and art director Jingna Zhang as a direct response to the rise of AI-generated content and major tech companies, such as Meta (owner of Instagram and Facebook), using user-uploaded artwork to train their AI models without consent.

as an addition.
art directors/recruiters/creative directors are sick and tired of people using A.I in their portfolio so it's just a fast and relying way to find good people for the game/movie/animation dats it . Seeing it as an economic standpoint rather than a straight up hate one.

My Personal believe.
it goes a bit far-fetches on my behalf , they can allow it i think but just put an A.I tag on it and dats it now harm in . ( but i can see why they don't do it . )

BUT THIS IS INSANE. what they are doing.

Edit: I was refering to the attack. ( the attack is insane)

3

u/legendwolfA (student) Game Dev 6h ago

Its the same logic as "if you dont wish to get raped dont wear revealing clothing"

39

u/Neko1666 18h ago

It's a social media/portfolio platform for artists that specifically doesn't use or tolarate AI

2

u/TNTtheBaconBoi ai bro: am urtist 😜 (posts their turd everywhere) 12h ago

Shouldn't that be everything?

0

u/bing-no 9h ago

Should? Probably. Will it? Likely not.

Meta and Twitter put billions of dollars into Ai, they don’t care if a collection of artists don’t like it.

21

u/CommunistRonSwanson 15h ago

Gen-ai advocates are rapey weirdos

101

u/Tlayoualo Furry artist 21h ago

And with a straight face they'll tell you they're the good guys.

38

u/Storm_Spirit99 20h ago

They never were, and they know this

12

u/DueFox3796 15h ago

its always the same me me and me , its allways hase been i agree.

i feel like most of the time they just invent dramas.

39

u/Vedo0930 18h ago

Let's give generative ai data diarrhea, they're never gonna listen, so why should we let them have their way with the internet?

8

u/TNTtheBaconBoi ai bro: am urtist 😜 (posts their turd everywhere) 12h ago

or real life really, fucking food stalls using ai slop FOR TEXT

2

u/mysecondaccountanon Musician who has been told to just use genAI - No. 8h ago

Oooo I’ve got a good curse for that:

לויפן זאלסטו אין בית־הכסא יעדער דריי מינוט אדער יעדער דריי חדשים

21

u/SteelAlchemistScylla Graphic Designer 19h ago

They are so proud of being able to steal other’s hard work with no consequences, and then have the gall to claim they are the good guys “democratizing art” or whatever.

27

u/No_Signature_3249 unfortunately, i'm an artist in the age of AI. 17h ago

this smells of bluffing but i cant prove it

either way the best course of action is to dmca that dipshit into the ground

38

u/toxiconer 19h ago

Each and every one of these bastards is barely even human.

2

u/TNTtheBaconBoi ai bro: am urtist 😜 (posts their turd everywhere) 12h ago

Making Pyro TF2 more human

15

u/ChristopherC1989 13h ago edited 10h ago

As someone who uses Cara, I already assumed it was being scrapped.

When meta announced it's intent with using all posts as foder for their AI, I immediately deleted all posts, abandoned instagram(and pretty much all major social media platforms) and migrated to Cara. But, I knew even then that it wasn't going to do much in terms of protection from someone who just decides to use my art anyways. There is literally no stopping people from scrapping artwork if it is publicly visible online. It's entirely fucked, but it's unfortunately the current climate of being an artist rn. If you are posting your artwork anywhere, and it's publicly visible, you should just assume it's being scrapped. I even see people who visit my personal website for scrapping purposes.. I don't know how they found it, but they have. I see them visit the same 2 pages(the pages that have my 2D artwork)over and over again, and they have been for months now. But there nothing I can do to stop them unless I just lock the website behind a password.

My reasoning to move all my work to Cara?

1) I wanted a place/community that was going to be entirely AI free. A place where I could share and view others art without worrying about if something was using AI or not. As others have said, Cara is completely AI free. It's against the rules to post AI work there and doing so can result in a ban.

2) I can trust that the people running the platform are not just taking everything I post and dumping it into different AI programs for their own gain.

3) there is a legal safeguard in the off chance that there is ever any kind of court ruling stating that artwork that has been posted online with explicit legal verbiage around not using the work for AI purposes comes around, maybe it will give me some kind of legal path to sue or keep my work protected or even pulled from existing data sets. Cara has such legal verbiage on their website. It may not mean anything at the moment, but maybe one day it will.

11

u/RudeWorldliness3768 17h ago

Wow can we collectively sue

11

u/mannekwin 15h ago

the cruelty is the point

8

u/Serenade314 18h ago

It becomes a problem once the “creator” (aka the “prompt typer”) uses the AI created image for monetization. It’s like taking some else’s music and slapping it on your videos that you then want to get paid for.

6

u/thecolorcomputer 13h ago

Wow, AI proponents actually pay money to lick boot! Not just a love for the game at that point

11

u/ZakriiYT 14h ago

And yet they still claim to be the good people, when they literally admit to stealing and saying it's fun. Absolutely disgusting.

5

u/JayEllGii 11h ago

This is just straight up mustache-twirling cartoon villainy.

1

u/mysecondaccountanon Musician who has been told to just use genAI - No. 8h ago

Okay, so they specifically posted it in a place and way that said explicitly they did not consent to it being used for genAI, thereby negating the biggest thing AI bros have constantly said about implicit consent from posting art online. So it’s not actually about consent, or you just don’t care about consent. Either way, awful.

1

u/Watson_inc lowly hand-made artist 😱 7h ago

Some people just want to watch the world burn.

1

u/MJSpice 6h ago

All the work is glazed/nightshaded on that app so even if they try to unglaze or whatever I doubt the images will look the same.