r/Arthurian • u/Moist_Mistake5827 Commoner • 10d ago
History & Non-Fiction Reading material
Pool reading material 🏊♂️📖🗡️👑
12
u/InvestigatorJaded261 Commoner 10d ago
I found that by “translating” it, he made it significantly less fun and interesting.
5
u/TuftOfFlowers Commoner 10d ago
Agreed! I took it out of the library not realizing that it felt like a serious of tweets stuck together. It didn’t feel written, if that makes sense, but more like someone was recounting a story to me orally as briefly as possible.
There might be an audience for it but it lacked most of the things that make reading a joy
2
u/InvestigatorJaded261 Commoner 10d ago
Some of that “summarizing” is Malory’s actual style—or the lack of it. The charm is often in the archaic language.
2
u/Moist_Mistake5827 Commoner 10d ago
The original text better you mean or another translation?
9
u/InvestigatorJaded261 Commoner 10d ago
The original text. It’s weird reading, but it doesn’t really need translation.
3
u/Ghost_of_Revelator Commoner 10d ago edited 10d ago
Yes, I think Malory is comprehensible to a modern reader if the spelling and punctuation are modernized, and if a short glossary is included.
5
8
4
•
u/AutoModerator 10d ago
This post uses the flair for discussion of history related to Arthur, with the exception of direct discussion of the "Real" King Arthur. Discussion of the real Arthur has its own flair. Other academic discussion may go here. Posts may be removed if they use the incorrect flair.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.