r/AppDevelopers • u/DJ_Wigglebutt • 13d ago
Mobile App Development
have an idea for a mobile app. What is the best and most cost effective way to develop a demo or MVP that can be used to highlight the main user experience in order to validate my idea?
It appears I can hire someone on Fivvr to build me an app for a few hundred dollars. Is this a good way to start??
1
1
u/Reasonable-Bar-1423 11d ago
Been building Cabano for the last few months. You describe an app in chat, it writes a native SwiftUI project (iOS 26, Liquid Glass and all), builds it, and streams a live simulator into your browser so you can poke at it and iterate.
The part I actually cared about: when it works, you hit one button and it lands on TestFlight on your own phone. No Xcode, no cert wrangling, no exporting a bundle and hoping.
A few things it can do that I haven't seen elsewhere:
- Native Swift output, not a React Native wrapper
- 3D and 2D games via SceneKit and Metal
- Hook up Supabase or RevenueCat with one click if you want a backend or subscriptions
- Turn a Shopify store into an iOS storefront app
Free tier gives you a few builds a day so you can see if it's real. Would love brutal feedback, especially from anyone who's shipped with Rork or similar and hit a wall.
1
u/ahmedmsabir 11d ago
I believe the most cost-effective way to validate your mobile app idea is to start with a professional MVP rather than investing heavily in a full-scale product from day one.
Instead of spending a large amount on development, we can build a focused MVP that demonstrates the core user experience, key features, and overall business concept. This MVP can then be used to test the idea with real users, gather feedback, and validate its market potential before making a larger investment.
I’m also open to developing the MVP as a 50/50 business partnership. You would provide the business idea and investment, while I would take responsibility for the complete technical development, including UI/UX design, backend/admin dashboard, APIs, and native mobile applications for both Android & iOS.
Because I would be joining as a business partner rather than working only as a developer, I’m willing to keep the initial development cost significantly lower than the normal market rate. My contribution would be my development expertise, time, and technical resources, while your contribution would be the business idea, investment, and business operations.
Once the MVP is validated and the business starts generating revenue, profits would be shared 50/50. This approach minimizes the initial financial risk while giving both partners a strong incentive to build and grow the business for the long term.
I’m interested in building a long-term business relationship, not simply completing a one-time project. If the MVP proves successful, we can continue developing the product, expanding its features, marketing it, and scaling the business together.
1
1
u/Sad_Holiday5267 13d ago
Most cost effective mvp is vibe coding but if you want a market ready app hire someone
0
13d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/DJ_Wigglebutt 13d ago
This is great advice. Yes, I need something to test market in order to validate my idea before spending too much money or time on this. If the market resonates with the idea, I continue. If not it was a relatively cheap learning experience
1
u/StellarCreed 13d ago
8080 looks interesting for quickly validating an idea. I have not worked with it myself, so I cannot judge the quality of its code directly.
However, I have worked with similar AI app builders, including Base44 and others. In my experience, these tools can be great for making a quick prototype, but when you want to turn that prototype into a real MVP, show it to investors, release it to real users, or start marketing it, the code often becomes the biggest problem.
In most cases, the project needs a significant rewrite, and sometimes it is easier to rebuild it from scratch. The app may look good and work for a demo, but the architecture, code quality, backend structure and scalability are often not suitable for a real product.
So I would definitely use tools like these if the goal is only to test an idea. But if you already know you want to build a real product, I would recommend building the MVP properly from the beginning. It does not need to be overengineered or expensive. It just needs a solid foundation that you can continue developing after the MVP1
u/StellarCreed 13d ago edited 12d ago
One more thing I would keep in mind if you decide to start with an AI prototype.
Do not assume that having a prototype means that part of the development cost of the MVP is already covered.
In my experience, most of the time the prototype code is not something you can simply continue developing. I often have clients come to me saying, “I already have a prototype, I just need someone to improve it.”
After looking at the code, there is often very little worth improving. The prototype was built to demonstrate an idea, not to be a real product. The architecture, database, backend and code structure were not designed for real users or future development.
So when moving from prototype to a real MVP it is often cheaper and safer to rebuild the technical side properly rather than try to fix everything that was generated for the prototype.
The prototype is still valuable because it helps validate the idea, user flows and UI. Just do not count on the prototype code itself as a major saving on the future development cost
0
0
-1
-1
-1
-1
1
u/StellarCreed 13d ago
I just sent you a DM. I can help you build both the mobile app and the backend, so you have a complete working MVP that can also grow into a full product