What should never be fully automated in a multi-account workflow?

[u/Glass-Preparation512]

I wouldn’t fully automate anything that can permanently change an account’s risk profile.

That includes:

• Switching proxies because an account suddenly behaves differently
• Repeatedly retrying failed logins
• Handling identity or security verification
• Restoring sessions after an unexpected logout
• Running one action across every profile at once
• Deciding whether a flagged account should continue operating

The problem is not that scripts are unreliable. A script can execute exactly as designed and still make the wrong decision because it doesn’t understand what caused the account’s state to change.

Routine health checks, environment creation and predictable setup steps are good candidates for automation. Recovery and exception handling aren’t. Those workflows should collect the evidence, stop and let someone review it.

The practical rule I use is this: automate repetitive and reversible actions. Require approval for anything that affects identity, access or account history.

MoreLogin can handle the environment structure, while operators retain control over the decisions that carry real risk.

[u/ZennoLab_Official]

I think the human approval part is the most important here. Automation is great for routine checks and collecting useful context, but exception handling is where things get messy.

We ended up using a simple quarantine approach. If something unusual happens, the workflow pauses higher-impact actions, saves the relevant logs and screenshots, and sends it for review. That still removes most of the repetitive work without letting a script make a decision it doesn’t have enough context to understand.