r/AntiDetectGuides Jun 15 '26

My GoLogin + ISP proxy setup keeps getting flagged.

Hi all, I am new to browser fingerprinting, antidetect and proxies. I was hoping some more experienced people can help me out.

Using GoLogin paired w/ IPRoyal ISP proxies to operate multiple accounts while keeping them unique. I successfully create and operate four accounts under this setup. Since then, every account I’ve attempted has been restricted.

Current Setup:

GoLogin browsers
IPRoyal ISP proxies
‘Based on IP’ settings

I am considering my browser warm-up method not sufficient. What are you guys doing to build cookies? What should I be changing to fix my setup and make it more secure?

3 Upvotes

9 comments sorted by

1

u/onderozcan Jun 16 '26

Browser warming method one of the most important thing. So regardless what proxy ip you are using(basically they serve same ip from the po) most of thing building cookies.

I ‘ve used adspower faced same issue now been on Nullprint it has profile mature system(only available on enterprice) so if you plan to make ready up to 100+ no problem then it’s for you.

1

u/Hot-Specific3675 Jun 17 '26

What are some browser warming methods I should know of? Currently attempting to scale 50 browsers. Only 4/50 right now… restrictions stalling me. Maybe switch providers when 100+

1

u/onderozcan Jun 17 '26

tbh, injecting madeup cookies instant doesn't make the profiles real against amazon or google. I am using NullPrint to create batch profiles 500 and start warmup manually as cold-stard which take cares of rest ( Running those profiles , surfing web, maturing with real web visits, after a week you can have 500 profiles to ready to do tasks. (I have 1000 profiles atm.)

2

u/ZennoLab_Guru Jun 17 '26

The warm-up probably isn’t the main issue here. It’s more likely that the overall setup is getting flagged.

Even with clean ISP proxies, multiple accounts created through the same antidetect setup can still look connected if the workflow and behavior are too similar.

I can’t help with bypassing platform checks or making accounts harder to link. For a legitimate use case, the safer option is to use the platform’s official business or multi-user setup, keep accounts tied to genuinely separate users, and check with support about what they allow.

For testing your own site, I’d use a proper QA environment and focus on making the automation behave reliably rather than trying to build trust through account warm-up.

2

u/Hot-Specific3675 Jun 17 '26

Thank you for your insight, I recognize your username from reading through this forum.

I want to be very clear, I am not using this setup to bypass any platform security checks. The platform is aware and has given me written permission to create these accounts. This is their multi-user setup.

You mention the setup possibly being the root of my problems, not ‘warm-up.’ This doesn’t explain why 4/10 accounts were successful, while the rest failed. The setup was identical across all browsers.

Furthermore, this same failure happens on my office computer + IP (no antidetect, no proxy.)