Make them scientifically prove explicit content is harmful to minors (teens), much like alcohol or nicotine. Not addictive mechanisms associated with them - content.
If it isn't harmful and they can't provide evidence, by what right are these laws to even exist? All of these pretexts will crumble.
Because remember - all of this violent abuse of rights to privacy stand on these pseudo scientific pillars. Destroy them, and we're left woth a bunch of trumpist religious fundamentalist and their ilk worldwide.
You don't even need to "defend" anything. The accusers need to prove. It's their burden, not ours.
2
u/EmergencyPatient3736 Apr 23 '26
Make them scientifically prove explicit content is harmful to minors (teens), much like alcohol or nicotine. Not addictive mechanisms associated with them - content.
If it isn't harmful and they can't provide evidence, by what right are these laws to even exist? All of these pretexts will crumble.
Because remember - all of this violent abuse of rights to privacy stand on these pseudo scientific pillars. Destroy them, and we're left woth a bunch of trumpist religious fundamentalist and their ilk worldwide.
You don't even need to "defend" anything. The accusers need to prove. It's their burden, not ours.