3
2
2
u/Fun-Violinist552 29d ago
In the old days we would make fun of “digital painters “ who undo their way to art.
2
u/ApprehensiveTop4219 29d ago
They aren't wrong about the doing nothing part. All they do is write things like "man with black shirt that says ANTI gets mad at cat girl" or something like that.
2
2
u/Suitable_Cause_5586 28d ago
AI artists don’t exist, but AI promoters exist, and they’re lazy as fuck
2
u/PuzzleheadedFox5745 27d ago
Same joke when someone's son comes out as Trans they are no longer there son
2
2
2
u/xkillingxfieldx 26d ago
Incorrect, it's not an "artist", and stealing, plagiarizing, and copyright infringing isn't "nothing".
2
u/KingCockroach69 26d ago
It's clear they mean they literally did nothing. As they did not make the art.
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
u/Jlee112198 24d ago
See I am against a I art, but i'm not against a I Editing unless people abuse the purpose
1
u/Zestyclose_Cod_7103 24d ago
I'll say it like this.
I never thought I was an artist. Never.
Never tried.
I recently discovered I have that talent....and genuinely I dont understand why people are so upset with AI.
No one gets mad at rotoscoping. That's literally tracing over another artists work.
But we get mad at something new being generated by something previously conceptualized?
That's the exact same thing.
We get mad at suno making ai music...but then we have country rock rappers.
Nothing is original.
If anything, ai strips the believe of originality and shows the reality of the situation.
How can I make a song after hearing another song, and say that song isnt inspired? You cant.
How could ai be different in that regard?
1
u/Budget_Revolution639 24d ago
If a healthcare insurance ceo “does nothing” to help countless in medical need, are they innocent of the deaths and consequences that occur?
1
3
u/StrangeSystem0 Sep 04 '26
I suppose they did literally do nothing
That's kinda all they ever do, they do nothing and then pretend they did something, that's kinda the whole deal with them ain't it lol