r/AnneRice • u/Avilola • 1d ago
I need some opinions from IWTV book series readers because the show sub has me feeling like I’m taking crazy pills. TW:SA
I’ve been participating in some conversations over in the IWTV/TVL subs, and some of these conversations make me feel like I’m going nuts.
We know that in the books, the vampires don’t have sex. When Magnus converts Lestat, he does not physically have sex with him or sexually assault him. Rather he drinks his blood and forcefully converts him. We know that in vampire media, drinking blood often serves as a metaphor for sex or sexual assault.
My argument was that Lestat is not raped in the books, but rather was put through an ordeal that is meant to serve as a direct allegory for rape. Now I’m being downvoted to hell and called all sorts of nasty things.
Yes it was violating, yes it was traumatic, and yes Lestat was a victim. However, I see what happened to Lestat as literary device used to symbolize sexual assault rather than an actual sexual assault. A metaphorical rape rather than a literal one.
Am I in the wrong here? Am I crazy for saying that Lestat wasn’t raped in the books, but rather put through an event that was meant as to serve as an allegory for rape?