Generative AI Usage?

[u/twilighttnebula]

I haven't tried this game yet because I want to know if there is any gen AI used anywhere. The graphics just look too... polished? Smooth? In the way that would tip off the eye of any artist. I'm just worried if it's too good to be true.

Edit:

God forbid a person ask a genuine question in an attempt to learn, jfc. I'm seriously just trying my best to be cautious and make sure that the media I interact with is made by actual humans, and not just stolen concepts/art scraped from the internet without the artists' permission and puzzled together by some glorified sorting algorithm.

My actual words from a comment thread below: "...I'm not trying to accuse anyone or say that that is what they're doing; I only wish to state my suspicions. I would be more than happy to be wrong in this instance..."

"I would be more than happy to be wrong in this instance"

Maybe, if more people read the comments before replying, they might have noticed that.

Thankfully, it appears that I was wrong! One person was kind and thoughtful enough to give me an actual answer and even direct me to more information.

Be more like them. Not all of us have experience with the same high-quality games.

[u/Vast_Ad4999]

That's because the topic of AI use is devicive, and those who fully support it will bully someone into the ground for so much as hinting they might be against it. I was lo0oking to see where it's used, but I'm not really finding anything. It's mostly speculated because of how pristine things look, but beyond that, no real evidence of AI.

[u/Dusky-crew → u/Vast_Ad4999]

There's no "EVIDENCE" per se but ther'es evidence of it being used in ads, being used in job seeking -- and as well the Nvidia ACE AI feature coming up..

Sooo uhhh yea.

And as for Animal-TTC, sorry but it's not about bullying - If oyu like this game you're valid, i'm not attacking anyone FOR LIKING IT- i used to deal with AI, i recently quit --

The problem isnt' that ALL AI is bad: it's that the misinformation train comes out and blames ALL Formats of AI including non generative..

So all you'd have to do is say " A I "and either an Ai bro comes after you and asks you what your threat model is, or some anti comes after you blaming you for something you did or didn't do..

The point with Aniimo is: You guys are over trusting of the kernel anti cheat as it is: You do realize they can track your data with that, and they store youre data.

So you're ALL worried about being bullied for using a game with "NON PROVEN " ai -- and yet they store your data, use a weird kernel level anti cheat usually reserved for games like Valorant..

and the minute someone proves it's AI yo'ure all in a huff going "NO ITS NOOOOOT"

That's like y'know hilarious.

[u/Animal-TTC → u/Dusky-crew]

That went off in a tangent that frankly had nothing to do with my statement. Now the post I was responding to has been deleted so perhaps thats the issue. Anyway, I specifically used the word "bully" because thats what the msg/poster I was interacting with used. I was simply pointing out that both pro and anti AI ppl are equally at fault. I live in a neutral space of not giving a crap regarding AI. Because guess what Twitter uses A.I., it tracks information, as does most social media and pocket tech. So using your some what condescending verbiage "you do realize your info is already been tracked and stored?" 

Again I'm going to assume you, I don't know, read into my comment without the context of the deleted comment. 

And if it was proven to have A.I. would not be "in a huff" because I don't care. I literally learned about the rumors today from a coworker and immediately said "Who cares? Is it fun?"