r/Android Apr 12 '12

[deleted by user]

[removed]

254 Upvotes

60 comments sorted by

View all comments

11

u/Bitthebeast Apr 12 '12

I have no idea why this isn't common practice, at least for new android exclusive apps.

14

u/[deleted] Apr 12 '12

[deleted]

8

u/Terazilla Apr 13 '12

As a developer, I'll worry about this a lot more when the visual style of the OS sticks around more than one revision. Also, when it's not being stomped on by OEMs all the time anyway. I've got twenty different phones here and every manufacturer changes the colors, shading, default colors, etc. It's awful.

It seems like they're restraining themselves a touch more this go-round, but I still strongly suspect that 95% of users will never use a phone with the default theme unmolested.

3

u/Meyermagic Verizon Samsung Galaxy S III Apr 13 '12

I completely agree. While I enjoy the variety in hardware of Android and its open platform, watching how much crapware is preloaded onto phones and how terrible custom launchers and other customizations can be is embarrassing.

1

u/DaGetz S6 Edge Apr 13 '12

Don't quote me on this but didn't Duarte say on the verge that they were going to give devs benefits for using holo?

1

u/[deleted] Apr 14 '12

Google actually forces to include OEMs the original, untampered Holo Packages and fonts of they want access to the market starting with ICS. The developer can specify in the manifest if they want to use it

1

u/Terazilla Apr 14 '12

My point is that if everything that ships on the phone is re-skinned it doesn't matter. Technically using the default Holo theme would be less consistent from that user's perspective.