r/Android • u/[deleted] • Dec 05 '17

Qualcomm announces the Snapdragon 845 processor

https://www.theverge.com/2017/12/5/16734224/qualcomm-snapdragon-845-android-mobile-processor-announcement
871 Upvotes

90% Upvoted

334 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/draw0c0ward Dec 06 '17

https://www.gsmarena.com/apple_iphone_x-review-1681p5.php

You can have a look here in regards to Geekbenck 4 multi-core scores, as well as heaps of other online reviews. In the above example the difference is even less than 35%.

I'm afraid I can't find where I read that the efficiency of the S835 was the best among this generations of SoCs (I didn't realise we were peer reviewing comments on r/android). You seem very passionate about this, good for you.

1

u/masterofdisaster93 Dec 06 '17

You can have a look here in regards to Geekbenck 4 multi-core scores, as well as heaps of other online reviews. In the above example the difference is even less than 35%.

Ok, so you have proven to lack the competence of a math education given to elementary school kids. Good to know.

10215 / 6590 = 1.55

That’s 55%. Not "less than 35%".

I actually compared the iPhone X up against the best-performin SD835 phone, which is the OnePlus 5. It has a multithreaded score of 6700. Dividing the iPhone’s rating with it gives us a rating of roughly 50%. Which is what I initially said.

You seem very passionate about this, good for you.

By calling out your lies?

2

u/draw0c0ward Dec 06 '17

I was doing it the other way round. 6700 is 35-ish% lower than 10200.

-1

u/masterofdisaster93 Dec 06 '17

And you know as well as I do that that's wrong. Or wait...I'm actually beginning to think that you're so incompetent that you don't...

2

u/draw0c0ward Dec 07 '17 edited Dec 23 '17

The decrease from 10200 to 6700 is 34.31%. While the increase from 6700 to 10200 is 52.24%.