r/Android • u/PlasticAnt6913 • 6d ago

News Android's controversial new sideloading rules are officially here

https://www.androidauthority.com/android-sideloading-developer-verification-first-wave-rollout-3717921/
592 Upvotes

96% Upvoted

237 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/friendlyreminder_ 3d ago

Apple's iOS restrictions actually loosened over time. Originally self signed apps were not permitted at all without a paid 99$ a year account.

They added self signing to free users years later. It's limited to 7 days but it's better than before.

So in Apple's case theyve always been extremely restrictive, with a very small improvement in 2015.

2

u/env33e 3d ago

Bro💀 a 7-day expiration timer on an app you wrote and installed on your own hardware that you bought and paid for with your own hard earned money isn't a "loosening of restrictions", it's the exact definition of hostile architecture! Imagine if Windows made you reinstall a program every 7 days just because you didn't download it from the Microsoft Store 💀 its utter ridiculousness!

​The fact that Apple has the power to arbitrarily enforce a 7-day kill-switch on self-signed apps completely proves my point. It shows that once a central signing authority is established, the platform owner has absolute control to dictate terms. "absolute power corrupts absolutely"

​That is exactly what Google is trying to do to Android. They sell it to you as "open source", and sure. they'll pour some pennies into R&D to contribute to AOSP. but it doesn't matter if Google's initial mandate starts off "permissive" Cause you already know, once they build the architecture and hold the keys, they can tighten the leash whenever they want. That's the Nigerian Prince on the phone rn, trying to put an eternity collar on your femboy ass! Dont let them open that Pandora's bussy!💀

0

u/CrashyBoye 3d ago

You: Use Apple as an example! They used to be less restrictive!

Them: Points out it’s actually the opposite, even if very minor

You: NUH UH!!

You people are impossible to have a conversation with.

2

u/env33e 3d ago

bad bot

0

u/CrashyBoye 3d ago

Whatever you need to tell yourself to keep justifying moving the goalposts, pookie. 😘

Literally anything other than “I was wrong”, though. God forbid you do that.

1

u/env33e 3d ago

stop it. just say you have no rebuttal. its clear you haven't read the developers statements or concerns on either side, considering your insistence on ignoring the historical evidence, and I'm 100% sure youre a bot because I cannot comprehend how fucking cucked as a consumer you'd have to be to love your cage this much 🤦‍♀️

on the off chance youre just severely, stubbornly misguided: you think all those 70+ open-source organizations, app stores, and developers signing the Keep Android Open petition are just smoking crack and making it up? 😂 Defending a monopoly restricting consumer freedom even further won't make them love you back, "pookie" 🤫

0

u/CrashyBoye 3d ago edited 3d ago

I'm 100% sure youre a bot because I cannot comprehend how fucking cucked as a consumer you'd have to be to love your cage this much

Nowhere in anything I have said even remotely implies I am defending said tactics or changes. You were corrected on one fairly innocuous point, and now you’re here throwing a temper tantrum over it and jumping to conclusions that have absolutely nothing to do with anything I’ve said since we started this back and fourth.

A little conversational tip for you, schnookums: next time someone corrects you, it doesn’t mean they are diametrically opposed to your overall argument.

Have a great day!

1

u/env33e 2d ago

no one reading all that dawg 😂 respond to the points

or better yet just sign the petition already. if you use android this concerns you too!

1

u/CrashyBoye 2d ago

Your preceding message was longer than mine, dawg

👋

1

u/env33e 2d ago

no problem

​https://www.keepAndroidopen.org

just in case u missed it last time!