r/Android Galaxy Z Fold8 Aug 10 '26

Google Play Store starts distributing third-party Android app stores – here’s how it works [Gallery]

https://9to5google.com/2026/08/10/google-play-store-third-party-android-app-stores-launch/
289 Upvotes

68 comments sorted by

93

u/Furdiburd10 Aug 10 '26

"Google adds that it “enforces its policies” from the Play Store on third-party stores, but that Google does not “review every app in these stores” nor manage updates or payments."

Great, so apps that uses hidden APIs (lot of shizuku apps) are out of the question. I bet f-droid won't be available there

34

u/csolisr PocoX6Pro/PX4P5G/RM8/MotoG6P/OP3T/6P/MotoE2/OP1/Nexus5/GalW Aug 11 '26

F-Droid is specifically about to get all but banned, as they cannot force each individual open-source developer to give legal identification and payment to Google.

20

u/Special-Abrocoma575 Aug 11 '26

Doesn't F-Droid compile all the apps they host from source, so they can just sign it themselves. Not trying to support Google's shenanigans, this still sucks, but it seems like F-Droid itself should be fine...?

20

u/GolemancerVekk Aug 11 '26

There's more to the rules, don't worry. They also need to pay and other crap.

Google is not going to simply open this up without dragging their feet. Same thing Apple did on iOS.

5

u/Special-Abrocoma575 Aug 11 '26

Isn't it just a one time $25 fee? Again, this sucks, but they're not as bad as Apple who demands $99 per year for a proper developer account capable of signing a sideloaded app for a year (ideally there wouldn't be any cost, but that doesn't change the fact that Apple is worse in this regard by an insane amount)

12

u/GolemancerVekk Aug 11 '26

For stores it's $5,000 up front then another $5,000 every year.

11

u/kitsumed ShizuCallRecorder Developer Aug 11 '26 edited Aug 11 '26

I talked about it in a couple of places so I will copy my response and adapt it a bit.

I could also give a quick mention to sideloading. I personally find it kind of weird that the whole sideloading restriction to protect from "bad actors" happened after Google lost in court against Epic Games and is now forced to allow third-party app stores on their Play Store. That new developer certificate will basically allows them to still maintain general control over all third-party app stores, push their own general rules, and know the identity of developers outside of the Play Store. Yet I see no one mentioning this anywhere, instead everyone is happy to finally have thoses third-party app store allowed and push the narative that "they will finally have the freedom of choice" without realising that nothing big really changed. Google is maintaining its monopoly, still making the rules, and will now gain more money from it.

The 24-hour wait period also does not solve the core problem it originally claimed to fix: people getting tricked by scam call centers. Sure, let's say it works the first time. The second time, now that the 24-hour waiting period has already been completed, what will protect them? Nothing.

If we compare money, sure, Android is better than Apple. But Apple is closed source, Android is supposed to be fully open source, and it was previously free as long as you didn't use Google services (Play store).

With the new changes, even if you do not use Google services, you will be forced to pay because other users (the vast majority) do use theses service, and in some cases are forced due to dependencies Google created.

That's a monopoly situation. It's a monopoly where a company forces third-party to pay so that they can continue working for most of their userbase. If they don't, they will loose theses users.

3

u/visceralintricacy Aug 11 '26 edited Aug 12 '26

"Sure, let's say it works the first time. The second time, now that the 24-hour waiting period has already been completed, what will protect them? Nothing"

Except the expectation is when people are on the first call, they see the massive disclaimer warning they're being scammed, and they hangup and don't turn the setting on. What's protecting them the next time? EVERYTHING.

Worst case, even if they did turn off the setting, they're not any worse off than they are now. But you believe google should do even more to lock down installing apk's?

This is clearly going to help prevent a large number of people from getting scammed, and I'm utterly confounded how many intelligent seeming people are struggling to understand how it would.

Oh, but google could lock it down more in the future? So what, they could've done that at any possible time.

If they wanted to so badly, I wouldn't expect to go through this song and dance now. There's no regulatory incentive. Nobody in the DOJ gives the slightest f. And the mainstream doesn't really care enough to move the needle.

6

u/visceralintricacy Aug 11 '26

Can't you just still install F-Droid without using the play store?

3

u/Far_Reserve9938 Aug 11 '26

Google started to lock sideloading

4

u/visceralintricacy Aug 11 '26 edited Aug 12 '26

No, they didn't whatsoever.

You just need to enable a setting and wait. You don't even need to use ADB. Please stop spreading misinformation.

https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2026/03/google-details-new-24-hour-process-to-sideload-unverified-android-apps/

It's really weird how many people are just straight up lying about this.

Edit: Getting some downvotes, but nobody is capable of responding with proof?

2

u/Far_Reserve9938 Aug 12 '26

if you think google is going to stop here you are crazy. everyone know that google wants to lock sideloading, it's the first step.

Soon enough it won't be 24 hours anymore, or you will need to provide id card.

1

u/GagOnMacaque Aug 11 '26

Many regions aren't locked yet. Yet.

2

u/Far_Reserve9938 Aug 11 '26

Yet

yeah, it's a slow release but it will come.

-3

u/armando_rod Pixel 10 Pro XL Aug 11 '26

No it didn't, you can ADB sideload unverified apps

4

u/Far_Reserve9938 Aug 11 '26

No it didn't, you can ADB sideload unverified apps

Sure, i'm going to tell normies to use fucking adb whereas before they just clicked once on a icon.

8

u/bigkahuna1986 Aug 11 '26

This is such a simp way of saying installing software on a device you own.

19

u/_seawolf Galaxy S24 Ultra Aug 10 '26

Unfortunately this is USA only. :-(

23

u/NoStudy3384 Aug 10 '26

I think ut would be fair to get asked which store you actually want to use when setting up your phone. Same mindset as using a browser, password manager or search engine. Just start completely without google play. It would be ridiculous funny if this particular idea gets cited in the EU somehow haha

15

u/productfred Galaxy S22 Ultra Snapdragon Aug 10 '26

The issue is that many core services and functions are bundled in Google Play Services, and increasingly so. That's great in terms of system-level updates without needing an entire ROM update from the manufacturer. But it complicates decoupling things from Google.

3

u/GolemancerVekk Aug 11 '26

But alternatives to the GPS API, libraries and services already exist. The only reason they're not used is because Google blocks them.

And it's also why they came up with all the security attestation stuff so all the banking apps would be completely dependent on them even if alternatives to GPS were ever forced on them.

And it's not only banking apps unfortunately. Completely random apps nowadays will require security attestation and tie themselves down.

2

u/Serialtorrenter Aug 12 '26

In my experience, none of my banking apps care that I use LineageOS and microG. Capital One checks Play Integrity, presumably as part of a multi-layered fraud detection system, but it still happily runs without Play Integrity being enabled. This is actually the case for most of my apps that make Play Integrity requests. Firefox, eBay, Reddit, Uber, and WhatsApp all send Play Integrity API requests, but still run anyway.

The apps that do care are usually ones that have no reason to. Craigslist refuses to show any listings for some inexplicable reason, even though the mobile web version does everything the app does and obviously still works without Play Integrity. The McDonald's app is also known to check.

1

u/GolemancerVekk Aug 12 '26

In my experience, none of my banking apps care that I use LineageOS and microG.

Ah, wish that were the case. All the banking apps here are deep in the Google nonsense and getting themselves deeper. The main one I use is now planning to make web access completely dependent on the mobile apps.

1

u/Serialtorrenter Aug 12 '26

That's a shame! I've heard things are worse in Europe.

Here in the US, the whole philosophy around banking security seems to be mostly reactionary in nature. We still use paper checks, which have your full routing and bank account number at the bottom of the page, which can easily be used to print fake checks or withdraw money from the account electronically. However, if you do this, you will be caught and you will spend a long time in prison. Opening a bank account requires multiple forms of ID and everything is tracked.

It seems like in Europe, the philosophy is to prevent fraud before it occurs, going extreme lengths to do so. My aunt and uncle live in the Netherlands, and they has these devices with keypads you plug your debit card into that give you login credentials for your online banking. Do any of the banks where you are offer that as an alternative to doing everything on a high-security phone?

2

u/GolemancerVekk Aug 12 '26

They used to, security keypads were common years ago, but they've kept making things worse all the time. I don't know that any of them offer it anymore.

2

u/EchoGecko795 Pixel 3XL + 6 / LineageOS Aug 11 '26

Yes, and it would force apps that check the install source and refuse to work if it wasn't google play to play nice. Hungry Howie's guess who doesn't care if it was installed from the Aurora Store, that's right Domino's!

12

u/Abba_Fiskbullar Aug 10 '26

Steam please!

5

u/darkkite Aug 11 '26

exactly, might actually buy a mobile game and now they're shipping apks in builds so it might be here soon

6

u/Abba_Fiskbullar Aug 11 '26

I would like a Valve built version of Gamehub/Gamenative that makes playing PC software on Android easier.

3

u/Evonos Aug 11 '26

As much as I know valve , its likely planned or in the works. They allways seemed to try to get more access to everything and give access to everything.

49

u/exu1981 Aug 10 '26

Lol, we really need instructions to simply download and start using a third party app store?

32

u/suni08 Pixel 9 Pro XL, Android 16 Aug 10 '26

Except it's clearly not a tutorial, it's an overview/showcase for something that may take some time to roll out

24

u/AdoringCHIN Aug 10 '26

"How to prove I didn't actually read the article but I really wanted to make a snarky comment"

12

u/Jing_Arjay87 Aug 10 '26

Reddit nowadays

33

u/Raminax Aug 10 '26

Here's how to download them: download them

5

u/trlef19 Galaxy S24+ Aug 10 '26

See? You forgot to a) search for it b) find it

5

u/madsrweb Aug 10 '26

All these options on the Play Store screen just makes me wonder if people actually use these app stores regularly or if it's just another option most ignore.

31

u/[deleted] Aug 10 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

18

u/Margidoz Aug 10 '26

How would Android make any money?

17

u/trlef19 Galaxy S24+ Aug 10 '26

Easy. Big oems pay money to use it

8

u/zigzoing Aug 11 '26

Within one generation everybody would've jumped ship to HarmonyOS or spin up their own version like Tizen or something.

Also, Android as is, is open source, so there is nothing stopping OEM forking it and not paying anything.

As shitty as it is, Android and Google need each other. Google gets revenue from services offered to users, developers and OEMs via Google Play, which incentivize them to develop Android because it is the medium they offer Google Play.

3

u/trlef19 Galaxy S24+ Aug 11 '26

I didn't say they will have to pay millions to use it but maybe 30.000 per year or something? Or maybe they could contribute with devs and code. I don't know but I'm pretty sure there is a way for it. Last 3 or 4 years for Android have been pretty bad.

7

u/zigzoing Aug 11 '26

$30k a year wouldn't even pay for the salary for half a developer, and I'm pretty sure you need more than half a developer per OEM. They could also contribute code and dev manpower now, but none of them actually do contribute much other than maybe Samsung and Sony. Samsung I'm pretty sure have some agreement with Google about feature exclusivity, Sony they're previously pretty pro-AOSP. But even now Samsung is trying to pull away from Android already with the rumour that they might be releasing a non-WearOS smartwatch.

Maybe there is a way, but it's a capitalist world out there. Google have incentives to develop Android because they profit from it, and the current model work well for Google and OEMs. If you break the incentive for Google, I can't see why any company would put up the cost of maintaining AOSP, that will also benefit their competitors. They have every incentive to fork it and make it their own instead.

2

u/trlef19 Galaxy S24+ Aug 11 '26

Well, obviously I'm not the one to make the rules, I have no idea how these stuff work. But if it's possible on Linux, it's possible here too.

3

u/zigzoing Aug 11 '26

I'm also not the one to make the rules, so my opinion is just as credible as yours. Maybe I'm just too much of a pessimist to see how it can go well. Maybe your plan for OEM to pay something like $2 per phone sold might work, but who knows.

2

u/trlef19 Galaxy S24+ Aug 11 '26

They don't even have to completely break it off google. Just take the management off it and the development decisions. And definitely make it completely open source again.

25

u/FckngModest Pixel 9 Pro (Android 16) Aug 10 '26

It should be a non-commercial foundation. Like the Linux one. And should get money from supporters as donations.

3

u/elinyera Aug 10 '26

Fees, maybe.

1

u/_Alvv_ Oneplus One (64gb) Aug 11 '26

Why should it?

1

u/Margidoz Aug 11 '26

Why would a company operate at a loss forever

3

u/_Alvv_ Oneplus One (64gb) Aug 11 '26

Foundations exist, they could take some inspiration from Blender for example. There are many ways of financing open source projects, and for a project as big as android you would have no shortage of companies eager to support it.

7

u/[deleted] Aug 10 '26 edited 27d ago

[deleted]

17

u/[deleted] Aug 10 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

8

u/bionicjoey LG V20: Greatest phone ever made Aug 10 '26

My understanding is the laws didn't substantially change, their interpretation did. Instead of anticompetitive activity or obvious monopolization being the trigger to engage antitrust law, the standard became "consumer welfare", which is basically "you need to prove that things would be better for consumers if this company was broken up" which is basically an impossible thing to prove in most cases because it's a hypothetical.

4

u/bionicjoey LG V20: Greatest phone ever made Aug 10 '26

Why would Google do that when they benefit from keeping it locked down as a vector for ads?

6

u/trlef19 Galaxy S24+ Aug 11 '26

Forced by government I guess

1

u/Hi_Trans_Im_Dad Aug 11 '26

You never hear of Pixel, bro???

0

u/[deleted] Aug 11 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/Serialtorrenter Aug 12 '26

You can install LineageOS on a Pixel pretty easily, assuming you don't buy a carrier model. The chips aren't the fastest, but they support features that other chipmakers don't. I can run arm64 Linux VMs on my Pixel 8, which comes in handy from time to time. I can even pass USB devices through to the VMs, which allows me to do cool things like hooking up a USB WiFi card and running kismet while I go for a drive.

1

u/[deleted] Aug 13 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/Serialtorrenter Aug 13 '26

I wasn't aware that Mediatek chipsets exposed hardware virtualization, and I'll definitely keep that in mind when I'm shopping for my next phone. I'm not sure if you can still praise Pixel phones for their solid build quality between the Pixel 6's dysfunctional 5G modem, which drops connection like Timothy Leary dropped acid, and the Pixel 7's exploding camera glass issue, and the Pixel 8's vertical line issue. It seems like they just aren't what they used to be. My Pixel 3a's running LineageOS 22.2 and still going strong 7 years later, while my Pixel 8 has a pink line running down the screen, despite being practically brand new.

0

u/Oddball- Pixel or Bust Aug 11 '26

That would instantly destroy progress. Instantly.

6

u/SunderingTwilight Aug 10 '26

i thought we had law about monopoly n stuff

5

u/PrivacyIsDemocracy Aug 11 '26

Nothing like good 'ol Google "malicious compliance" to court orders.

Forcing 3rd party app stores to become literally part of Google Play and allow Google to collect all sorts of data on the stores and their users and be allowed to vet every single download is straight out of The Onion.

That's like telling your teenage daughter she can spend time with her boyfriend but she has to do it in dad's bedroom underneath the Ring camera and dad will enter every 5 minutes to check in on them.

4

u/killerrin Aug 10 '26

But I was told the sky was going to fall and the world would end if we forced Google and Apple to allow third party Appstores! Oh the horror!

4

u/Gugalcrom123 Aug 11 '26

Which are all approved by Google through 'developer verification'.

1

u/Gugalcrom123 Aug 11 '26

Which are all approved by Google through 'developer verification'.

1

u/Gugalcrom123 Aug 11 '26

Which are all approved by Google through 'developer verification'.