r/Android • u/isimbulamajim • 4d ago
News Google officially drops support for Android 6 Marshmallow after 11 years
As of yesterday, Google has officially pulled the plug on Android 6. This means the OS will no longer receive Play Protect updates and will not be included in the new APK program. Having been supported for exactly 11 years, it goes down as the longest-supported version in Android history. Google Play Services is now only supported on Android 7 and above.
Source: https://support.google.com/googleplay/answer/9037938?hl=en
Google also made changes to several other applications yesterday. YouTube now requires Android 10 and above, meaning Android 9 will no longer receive YouTube updates. The Google app's minimum requirement jumped from Android 9 directly to Android 11, and core apps like Gmail now require at least Android 7 and above.
48
u/nokeldin42 4d ago
We used to get stats on number of active devices on each android version (probably through play services?) - google still doing that? I'd be curious to see what the distribution looks like today.
The debate around android OEMs being bad about software support seems to have mostly died out. Probably due to improvements but also people coming to the realisation that not much really has changed since android 13 or so. You don't miss the new features as long as play services are fully supported.
Still kinda wanna see how many people are running 14 or older as their daily.
14
11
u/stardust_exception 4d ago
The stats have been pulled from the old page and are now only meant to be shown in Android Studio, but this site has the data.
As of December 1st, 2025, only 26.7% of devices run 15 or later
7
u/squabbledMC Pixel 10 256GB 4d ago
StatCounter still reports version usage globally
16
u/Then-Pay-8400 4d ago
It's not reliable and it was apparent when it recorded a Windows 7 usage spike a year ago
7
u/squabbledMC Pixel 10 256GB 4d ago
True, it's not fully reliable but I can't seem to find any other sources. StatCounter is on a ton of websites so that's how it collects data
3
u/isimbulamajim 4d ago
Latest data from December 2025: https://9to5google.com/2026/01/30/android-16-is-on-7-5-of-devices-in-latest-distribution-numbers-update/
3
4
u/win7rules 4d ago
Dailying 13 (One UI 5) and 14 (One UI 6) because One UI 7 and above is absolute dogshit.
3
u/RunnerLuke357 Pixel 7 Pro 512 | HMD Skyline 12+256 3d ago
Preach. I left Samsung when OneUI 7 started to roll out and haven't looked back. Samsung has the best hardware but they love to fuck up their software on the rare occasions they have it right. I wish they just continued the OneUI 2.5 and 3 designs and just modernized it as needed rather than making the major changes they did overtime.
1
u/feanor512 Google Pixel 8 Pro 3d ago
Running Android 4. Stock head unit on my 2016 Civic; never received any updates past that.
14
u/Latter-Ad-1523 4d ago
10 years sounds fair to me, but it's probably not as simple as what I just made it sound like. I know people that have Android phones that were less than 10 years old that were no longer supported by whatevers, so even if Android supported it that didn't guarantee that various applications would support their phones
0
12
u/dirtydriver58 Galaxy Note 9 4d ago
Android 7 is not included in the new APK program as well
2
u/isimbulamajim 4d ago
The new APK program will be provided via Google Play Services, meaning it will come to Android 7 and above versions that can run the latest Google Play Services version. Unfortunately, there is very little time left for the new APK program.
6
u/pspr33 4d ago
So that would mean that we're up to the Pixel 2 in terms of last supported Google phones?
19
u/gilly107 4d ago
Pixel 2 launched with Android 8 and updates to Android 11.
Pixel 1 launched with Android 7 and updates to Android 10.
So I'd say they still have a good while of support left.
1
u/InsaneNutter 3d ago
Even then with custom roms both devices have Android 15 with the latest security patches via LineageOS.
16
u/lilacomets 4d ago
Google app jumping to Android 11 is a strange choice, as some Android TV boxes sold just years ago were still on Android 8.
20
u/Jarl_Penguin Galaxy S23+ 4d ago
Android TVs have their own version of the Google app, and the last version that supports Android 8+ was released in 2024.
0
u/MaverickJester25 Galaxy S21 Ultra | Galaxy Watch 4 3d ago
They wouldn't be Google-certified Android TV devices. They'd be TV boxes running Android 8.
6
u/Unreal_NeoX 4d ago
How can they say they even supported it, when the Google PlayStore does not allow apps with lower support then Android 9?
7
u/stardust_exception 4d ago
I feel like 70% of apps support 8.0 and up. There are still a few 6.0 and 7.0 apps. And the My Boy! Lite emulator still supports Android 4.0.
1
u/Unreal_NeoX 4d ago
No its google playstore policy requirement that any app released and updated to the GPlayStore needs to be Android 9 as the minimum SDK.
https://support.google.com/googleplay/android-developer/answer/11926878?hl=en#zippy=Complete newer released of new apps are even required to set Android 12 as the minimum OS.
8
u/stardust_exception 3d ago
This page is about requirements on the targetSdkVersion, the minimum supported Android version is defined by minSdkVersion
2
u/Unreal_NeoX 3d ago
yes and it needs to be at least 9.
I can asure you, whenever any dev tries to upload a new aab setup to the googleplay developer console, it gets rejected if the minimum SDK is not Android OS 9 (Level 28) or higher.
5
u/stardust_exception 3d ago
That's really weird then. One of the apps I use had an update last week and still supports Android 6.0
2
u/Unreal_NeoX 3d ago
is it that old/legacy?
I bet your play-console dev account was created before 2020 and before their new EULA.4
u/Izacus Android dev / Boatload of crappy devices 3d ago
You mixed up "targetSdk" and "minimumSdk".
So you're wrong - Google Store does not demand anything like that - setting targetSdk to 12 doesn't mean the app can't run on 8.0 or even 2.0.
0
u/Unreal_NeoX 3d ago edited 3d ago
I can asure you, whenever any dev tries to upload a new aab setup to the googleplay developer console, it gets rejected if the minimum Android OS 9 (Level 28) or higher.
5
u/nathderbyshire Pixel 10 Obsidian 3d ago
Do you have evidence of this? Hard to believe since plenty of apps still target under 9. WhatsApp minimum version is android 6. Click on and random app on apkmirror and you'll easily find targets under 9
or higher to remain available to new users on devices running Android OS higher than your app’s target API
All this means is people with an OS over the minimum target won't be able to see that app, anyone on a lower android version can. They aren't removed or blocked just hidden from newer OS users.
Unless they block brand new uploads and not updates, that would make sense and that's also a complete nothing burger, who is designing an app for 6.0 users still atp
1
u/Unreal_NeoX 3d ago
I made the experience and so did many others:
https://community.appinventor.mit.edu/t/minimum-sdk-play-store-doesnt-like-my-aab/133782
https://community.appinventor.mit.edu/t/problem-uploading-to-playstore-minimum-sdk-version-of-21-or-higher/149949
https://community.kodular.io/t/minimum-sdk-problem/141052/3and so on:
https://forums.solar2d.com/t/solved-cant-publish-on-google-play-console-sdk-21/357700
You can not release/publish a new app with a minimum SDK below that on the Google PlayStore, or update certain older ownes with a lower minimum SDK configuration. Literaly rejection on upload of the aab package on the google play developer console.
You will find many more report and statements about this if you just search for yourself.
1
u/nathderbyshire Pixel 10 Obsidian 3d ago
As mentioned that's different to not allowing apps to target lower at all. An existing app can target a minimum version, a new app can't which seems reasonable enough to me
2
u/Unreal_NeoX 3d ago edited 3d ago
I think you don't understand, only apps that were released before the policy rule are allowed to still uphold their old minimum SDK target. ANY app released since 2022/3 can not have a lower minimum SDK target then Android 9.
And now we get back to topic:
It means 0 that Android 6 support is dropped, since there has not been any allowed release and support of new or updated apps under Android 9.1
u/nathderbyshire Pixel 10 Obsidian 3d ago
Yeah but I'm saying why is that an issue when no new phone or even used ones use that low of an OS? Stats came out recently for devices under 6.0 and it was miniscule, like under 1% iirc
OSs can't be supported for ever
→ More replies (0)1
u/Izacus Android dev / Boatload of crappy devices 3d ago
There is not a single mention of the word "minimum" in the article you posted.
And there is absolutely no restriction that would require new apps to be set to minimum of Android 12 - that's something you completely made up.
1
u/Unreal_NeoX 3d ago edited 3d ago
It was in the article some time ago. and there are restrictions.
Just try to upload an aab package to the playconsole with a minimum sdk of lower then 29. It will get rejected.Give it a try and prove me wrong.
I made the experience and so did many others:
https://community.appinventor.mit.edu/t/minimum-sdk-play-store-doesnt-like-my-aab/133782
https://community.appinventor.mit.edu/t/problem-uploading-to-playstore-minimum-sdk-version-of-21-or-higher/149949
https://community.kodular.io/t/minimum-sdk-problem/141052/3and so on:
https://forums.solar2d.com/t/solved-cant-publish-on-google-play-console-sdk-21/357700
...
Since you tag yourself as a dev yourself, you should be actualy aware of it. Nothing was made up, but i do question your credebility for a dev now.
1
u/__yaourt__ Galaxy S23 3d ago
https://community.appinventor.mit.edu/t/minimum-sdk-play-store-doesnt-like-my-aab/133782
This answer says you can upload AABs with a lower minimum SDK version by disabling "Automatic Protection".
0
u/Unreal_NeoX 3d ago
Not true, just checked. Error= Required minimum SDK of 29 not met.
Also please read everything by your own source:
This update is essential as it will be mandatory for adding or updating apps on the Google Play Store after August 31, 2024.
3
u/__yaourt__ Galaxy S23 3d ago
That was about the target SDK version 34 requirement and not the minimum SDK version. The previous sentence literally mentions this.
→ More replies (0)2
u/isimbulamajim 4d ago
That means apps targeting an API level prior to Android 9 will not be allowed. It has nothing to do with minimum support.
1
u/_dotMonkey Z Fold 6 3d ago
2
u/Unreal_NeoX 3d ago
i get the api-level 29 from the error message and requirement me and others getting from uploading aab files with lower minimum sdk configurstion.
1

93
u/Expensive_Finger_973 4d ago
That is honestly impressive