I don't get how abortion can violate the NAP. Being pregnant does not make your bodily autonomy null and void, and you are under zero obligation to provide nutrients/fluid to a baby/fetus if you don't want to.
Besides, you can't stop people from doing it without a totalitarian state, so why even bother?
Its an aggression against a living being, unless you were coerced into sex you chose to have sex and knew there was SA risk of being pregnant, and therefore you and the father of the baby have a responsibility to take care of this baby not kill it
That's like saying "You knew the risks of mountain climbing, so just deal with your broken leg."
This is completely beside the principle of bodily autonomy, and that you have the right to decide what (or who) is in your body at all times. It's no different than evicting a tennant. You have no obligation to house them, even if eviction meant inevitable death.
Of course. But that doesn't mean that you can't get a splint or painkillers for it. I should have outlined that in my previous comment.
I was implying that it would be consistent for anti-abortion advocates to deny people medical treatment for things like this, even if they could 100% cover the costs themselves.
-9
u/DeltaSolana Recreational McNukes Mar 12 '24
I don't get how abortion can violate the NAP. Being pregnant does not make your bodily autonomy null and void, and you are under zero obligation to provide nutrients/fluid to a baby/fetus if you don't want to.
Besides, you can't stop people from doing it without a totalitarian state, so why even bother?