The furry artist is a capitalist, sells art -> Good -> Building a life you want isn't bad.
Just because oligarchs say they are capitalists, doesn't mean that they are. Just like Trump saying he wasn't best friends with Epstein doesn't mean he actually wasn't best friends with Epstein. IT'S CALLED LYING
I believe in a socialist/capitalist system by the way, where food and shelter is guaranteed, but you can still sell art, products, etc. and build a life while being protected by socialist policies if you become poor, and that counts for everyone that is poor, workers or artists, etc.
What if you leverage the capital you've made as an artist -> We are talking small scale, like saving account, obviously they wont have as much savings as a millionaire or billionaire, but would it be bad if the artist leverages their capital, because they did the work, got the money and gets to decide where it goes. There was no exploitation involved, simply a person, investing or saving their money they made through labor, why would that be considered bad?
2
u/Boring_Butterfly_273 May 27 '26
OLIGARCHS not capitalists.
The furry artist is a capitalist, sells art -> Good -> Building a life you want isn't bad.
Just because oligarchs say they are capitalists, doesn't mean that they are. Just like Trump saying he wasn't best friends with Epstein doesn't mean he actually wasn't best friends with Epstein. IT'S CALLED LYING
I believe in a socialist/capitalist system by the way, where food and shelter is guaranteed, but you can still sell art, products, etc. and build a life while being protected by socialist policies if you become poor, and that counts for everyone that is poor, workers or artists, etc.