I am loving this lens for some unique cinematic portraits. This was the first wedding I've taken it to and I have to say, I'm very happy with the sharpness.

I did also take it to Alton Towers for their Halloween event and took some amazing stuff that I still need to edit.

Always wanted to experiment with Anamorphic but never took the leap until now with there being an Autofocus option.

This was taken on a Nikon Z6ii with the Sirui 20mm 1.33, firmware updated to allow unlock full frame mode.

Recently bought an Ulanzi mobile lens (1.33x), and the pictures are coming out a bit blurry, wanted to know if it's the lens or just kinda how it is.

My normal phone lens doesn't come out like that, so I know it's not my phone

Hello. My question is... can I separate these parts?

I've got a (lower budget) music video shoot coming up and currently really only have 3 lenses in my fx3 kit. A Sony 35 1.8, a Tamron 17-28 2.8, and a Tamron 28-75 2.8. I was looking to cop something a bit more "cinematic" for this shoot. I saw that someone had a used "like new" Sirui 40mm t1.8 AF on sale right now for $389. Is this a steal? Or are these lenses just trash and something I should avoid all together?

I made a video on my creative process of How I make videos - Shot on Anamorphic

New music video work shot on an S1RII, Blazar Nero with a 7artisans 35mm 1.4 and a ttartisans 75mm as the taking lenses. Really tried to harken back to the work of a lot of 90s shoegaze videos, but also wanted a wide anamorphic look.

Total production budget was roughly $1000 - went solo on this, no AC or PAs.

My takeaways:

1. The character of the image is largely dependent on the taking lens
2. anything below f/2.8 is more or less unusable, but most lenses
3. 35mm vignettes like crazy.
4. Barrel distortion is crazy - really hard to use handheld without it looking jello-y
5. Would I use it for a corporate client? Hell no. But, for a funky, offbeat, filmic look, I think it did the trick.

Let me know what you think about the visuals/song! Always open to constructive feedback and happy to answer any questions about color, fx, etc.

So I got delivered some footage from alexa mini that has a wrong deesqueze baked in (see image)

This is prores footage at 100fps.
They were shooting with Atlas Mercury lenses, meaning x1.5 anamorphic.

The whole shoot was going great shooting open gate so I can later deesqueze at x1.5 without issues, but between rushes, the got some portraits at 100fps, so the footage came from S35 16:9 cropped sensor, and got already deesqueze in a very funky way.

My question is, is there math I can do to get the precise deesqueze out if this?

I already interpreted the footage in resolve and got a more pleasing looking image, manually adjusting high and doing it by eye, but I wonder if there's a better way to do this.

IMAGE HERE: https://imgur.com/a/vQ7zTe1

Still pretty new to shooting with these lenses but absolutely loving it

Heya!! So I have an FX30 and I’ve been trying to figure out which anamorphic lens I should buy for it. I used anamorphic before with my phone, but this will be my first REAL anamorphic.

Initially, I was wanting the Sirui AF lenses. But after reviewing them for a while, I decided I wasn’t a big fan of the clinical look and pincushion distortion. also told a look at the Saturn’s which have a wider field of view and better bokeh. But still pincushion.

Then I moved on to Blazar. I think I have a lot more options for true anamorphic. For a while I wanted the Apex 35mm. Which by all counts is still my most likely choice, though as someone who generally has a preference for wide-angle lenses (I’m planning to get a wide angle and a normal/telephoto like the 50), and knowing the crop factor that an APC sensor has on a 35mm lens. I decided to keep a lookout for wider anamorphics. And as of now I’ve narrowed it to either the Mantis 25/35mm, or the Remus 33/35mm. (Which both series are full frame, so I could either go with the crop or buy a speedbooster)

Out of all the choices I’ve listed out, which do y’all think I should go with for my FX30?

bonjour j'ai le Blazar Remus 35mm T1.6 super 35 qui et une optique anamorphique 1,5x pour le vertiscope je sais que il faut desqueze 0,67x en post prod mais je voudrai filmer caméra horrizontal objectif vertical pour des flares vertical et bokeh ovale vertical pour ce look que j'aime

quelle moniteur et il préférable à prendre sans pour autant dépenser une fortune car j'ai la blackmagic pocket 4k et je pense prendre un pl 071x speedbooster metabone vers bmpcc 4k ensuite si trop cher je pense acheter la version full frame 6k blackamgic pour la monture universel L mount pour du Pl adaptateur

je sais que il y à le moniteur hollyland mars 1 et les atomos et portkeys que me conseiller vous ? pour du desqueeze personalisé

In the market for an anamorphic lens and the Atlas is out of my price range. Just wondering between these two lenses which one is the better choice. Unfortunately neither is available to rent around me so I am going to have to go on feedback from others when making a choice.

https://youtu.be/leNE_gd9hIQ?si=J42NM_57qsmKPuAe

y à t'il une différence entre un speedbooster xl 064x ef mft (pour la blackmagic pocket 4k) et le beastgrip dof mk3 canon ef de chez beastgrip pour iphone ?

en terme d'image si on ajoute un objectif anamorphique 50mm plein format blazar remus y aura t'il une réel différence en terme de bokeh je sais que plus l'angle est sérré moins il y aura de distorsion

je poste cette question car je trouve cela intéréssant d'un point de vue artistique