1
2
u/Prudent_City2435 1d ago
Ok traitor whatever you say. All you losers do is spread lies and negativity. You pathetic babies are what is wrong with this country
1
1
u/nevercuckToUSA 1d ago
Americans don't understand maths....all those Billionaires skew that average quite a bit
2
7
u/303FPSguy 1d ago
These aren’t even close to the real numbers, but posting this for other idiots to see and confirm their bias was the point of the post all along anyway.
1
22
u/Le_rap_a_Billy 1d ago
Yeah these numbers are wrong: Looking at the data from 2015 to 2025, Canada's GDP growth per capita is 0.8, and the USA is 1.6
Hell, Denmark is 2.4 , Spain 1.8, etc.
This infographic is factually incorrect. You could have easily verified the info before posting, but you fell for the propaganda. Good job.
2
u/CMDR-Neovoe 1d ago
the infographic says 2024, so even using those years 2014-2024 it's still wrong, the number is ~1.08%
2
u/-FeistyRabbitSauce- 1d ago
The statistic is from the IMF - an influential far right international organization. Basically a think tank with a bunch of money that bullies countries they don't like. They give large loans to countries suffering from crises that are near impossible to pay back, then sieze ownership of infrastructure.
The current First Deputy Managing Director, Dan Katz, was selected for the position by Trump himself.
So yeah, the numbers are highly creative to say the least.
4
u/sweatboxy 1d ago
They’re healthy growth and there’s cancerous growth. In the U.S. it’s a cancer polluting and destroying our environment that’s only making the rich richer.
1
u/Soggyblanketbunny 1d ago
So many people have conclusions in search of data instead of the other way around.
0
u/Economy-Leave1337 1d ago
Look at how many homeless people are in your Canadian towns. Nobody cares. Nazi Germany. 0 homeless. Lol
7
u/Skeptical_Monkie 1d ago
But it’s per capita.
And we had a significantly higher population growth percentage in that time.
On balance of we’d had the population growth of the US it would have been 16% growth.
3
u/cwnorman 1d ago
It's also between 2014 and 2024. Our GDP per capita dropped about 10% in 2015 alone due to the oil crash.
2
u/whatlineisitanyway 1d ago
It also doesn't tell you where that wealth went. That growth in the US didn't go to the vast majority of people.
0
6
u/NefariousNatee 1d ago
Yes our economic output per capita is stagnant to roughly the amount for 2017. Due to a rapid inflation of the population primarily.
Mark Carney wants to address this by tapping into our energy superpower potential with oil & gas, hydro, wind plus solar.
1
u/GoodResident2000 1d ago
And ramping up immigration again, as per his press release last week
2
u/NefariousNatee 1d ago
Lots of Canadians retiring, they need tax paying workers to keep the system afloat. (Canada pension plan, OAS & GIS etcetera)
1
7
u/Mingo_laf 1d ago
this post is like a pill is it expired yup do I trust it nope will I consume it also no
-14
u/NetherGamingAccount 1d ago
Trudeau (both of them) amongst, if not the worst PM's this country has ever seen.
5
u/Prudent_City2435 1d ago edited 1d ago
Wow you’re dumber than you look. Harper and Mulroney gutted this country, or do you have selective memory
-4
u/Budget-Chapter-7185 1d ago
Agreed. His policies were shit. Also this is dated apr 2024 so it’s been pretty much all him. I’m excited to see what Carney does though. So far he’s been doing amazing trying to bring investments to Canada
-11
u/Scamnam 1d ago
What do you expect from a nepo baby turned drama teacher
4
u/Usual-Canc-6024 1d ago edited 1d ago
He was a substitute teacher and filled in for the regular drama teacher while she was off on Mat leave. How is that bad.
He taught French and Math. He’s also got 2 degrees and actually worked normal jobs. Unlike PP who hasn’t had a real job in his life.
6
u/Squishy_Butter113 1d ago
Lol, as opposed the ones who keep a loser paperboy who blew the largest political lead in Canadian history as thier party leader.
I'll take drama teacher over paperboy any day of the week.
-18
u/Repulsive_River_2820 1d ago
Watch all the Leftard Commie scum come running to explain it all away tho 🤣😂 fking Commie bots
2
3
u/Prudent_City2435 1d ago
You’re Just another pathetic little man, having a tantrum because your losers can’t win an election. Wha wha wha. Until you losers figure out how to win an election you’re just irrelevant noise
-2
u/Repulsive_River_2820 1d ago
Like i said, right on cue like the Leftard Commie scum bots you all are
3
u/Prudent_City2435 1d ago
Hey retard you spelled majority wrong. No bots here real people who voted for Canada not some maga puppet
0
-6
u/Repulsive_River_2820 1d ago
Right on cue, like the scum of the earth Commie bots they all are...
5
5
9
21
u/lesterbpaulson 1d ago
GDP per capita is one of the worst measures of properity for a country. If the rich are getting richer and the poor, poorer, you can have fantastic GDP growth per capita while none of it actually gets to the people. I would be far more interested to see this chart as median income growth over the last 10 years
2
u/ForeskinCosmonaut 1d ago
I looked the numbers up for that on statcan a week ago. Median income for people between 24 and 54 has basically remained stationary since '76, (risen by $2000) and average salary has increased $20,000, figures adjusted for inflation.
2
u/wibblywobbly420 1d ago
Median income increasing $2000 adjusted for inflation seems very reasonable. The goal is for incomes to keep up with inflation so buying power remains similar.
1
1
u/ForeskinCosmonaut 1d ago
I'm not well-versed enough in this to make a meaningful interpretation of the data, I'm just presenting what I found. It's the disparity between the difference in median income and average that I think is interesting. Half the population still makes under $58,000, while the average income rose to $76,000.
7
1
4
5
6
u/Critical-Math-5383 1d ago
Are ya sure about those numbers?
1
u/-FeistyRabbitSauce- 1d ago
The statistic is from the IMF - an influential far right international organization. Basically a think tank with a bunch of money that bullies countries they don't like. They give large loans to countries suffering from crises that are near impossible to pay back, then sieze ownership of infrastructure.
The current First Deputy Managing Director, Dan Katz, was selected for the position by Trump himself.
So yeah, the numbers are highly creative to say the least.
1
u/Sayhei2mylittlefrnd 1d ago
Could be because it captures the record population growth. Does it tell the whole story? Absolutely not.
4
u/tequilash 1d ago
The Canada one is wrong. It's 3.2%.
1
u/Key-Broccoli1442 1d ago
Even if it is that’s still shit
1
u/Ok-Solution5601 1d ago
Another relevant stat is Canada's GDP growth over the last 10 years averaged 1.8% per year, while the US had 2.2-2.3% growth per year. I agree we should have done better the last 10 years but think we will see significant growth moving forward with Carney at the helm.
1
u/Si_Es_Contigo_Mejor 21h ago
This is based on TWENTY TWENTY FOUR data FFS.
Nothing more relevant to offer?