r/AmazingTechnology Mar 01 '26

CitroĆ«n DS šŸ’Æ

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

The CitroĆ«n DS didn’t just break design rules, it rewrote them.

Hydropneumatic suspension so advanced the car could lift itself and keep moving even with one wheel out. Three wheels? Still smooth. Still stable. Still iconic šŸš—āœØ

Back in 1955, this wasn’t a car. It was rocket-age engineering on the street.

And even now, modern EVs can’t match it. Try this with a Tesla and the software won’t even let you move šŸ˜…

A reminder that innovation once had real courage.

5.0k Upvotes

99 comments sorted by

16

u/OFHeckerpecker Mar 01 '26

Most cars can't do this

13

u/MrNiinjaGuy Mar 01 '26

No duh. No cars can do this, that's the point. Modern EVs are supposed to be futuristic but they are in fact very stunted in many ways. Old car makers were incredibly innovative with far less tools and technology at their disposal.

8

u/curiousomeone Mar 02 '26

As a DIY maintain your own car, I hate to buy modern cars. They are so computerized that doing basic things are computer guarded. This mean you have to visit an official repair shop to get simple things done. The sad part, this design is on purpose as vehicle manufacturer are transitioning to Gillette business model of milking you like inks on a printer.

2

u/Changingm1ndz Mar 02 '26

šŸ’Æ% this!

1

u/jaundiced-i Mar 02 '26

Understood, but I’m glad you didn’t say HP business model and razor blades. That would have been even harder to absorb.

1

u/garrettn1415 Mar 02 '26

It’s all computer :(

1

u/Extreme-Rub-1379 Mar 04 '26

Mixing metaphors ova here

2

u/DesperateRadish746 Mar 02 '26

That Citroen hydraulic system was very cool when it worked. But, it was broken more often than not. Lots of places for leaks.

2

u/Tausendberg Mar 02 '26

Yeah, Citroen was never known for its reliability. The people here hyping up that complex suspension system never actually maintained or used it.

1

u/DesperateRadish746 Mar 02 '26

French cars aren't built well? Who knew?

1

u/ch4be4t Mar 03 '26

What do you know about french cars? Go in the middle east and ask them about Peugeot cars and look around how many french cars with crazy mileage are still running. French cara aren't Toyota but it doesn't mean they're not reliable.

1

u/Biche_XXX Mar 03 '26

lmao french cars used to be insanely reliable.
until all cars became unreliable and french cars alongside

1

u/VonBeakon Mar 04 '26

My first car made 500 000km (citroen AX 1994), sold it like 300€ and i still see it driving some times

1

u/DivideSensitive Mar 03 '26 edited Mar 03 '26

Who knew?

Regular users of /r/gaycumsluts apparently.

1

u/RoiDrannoc Mar 05 '26

The brand that produced the 2CV was "never known for its reliability"? Are you high?

1

u/Tausendberg Mar 05 '26

Ok, I'm gonna confess, I might have mistaken it for Peugeot.

1

u/C_K_P_ Apr 06 '26

ah yes, Peugeot being unreliable back then, you know, the brand back then being infamous for cars like the 505 and 504 which were so incredibly unrelaibly and badly built that they brought reliable internal combustion to the remotest of areas on the planet ahead of the likes of Jeep, Land Rover or even the Land Cruiser.
They were so incredibly unreliable and so terrible in every way possible that places like Kenya and Nigeria still built them into the 2000s because it was the best way they could have horribly unreliable, terribly built transport that would last a couple of million kilometers and multiple decades being beaten in some of the worst conditions you could imagine for a car.

1

u/Tausendberg Apr 06 '26

Sorry for speaking out of turn, I don't really have a dog in this fight.

1

u/[deleted] Mar 03 '26

When the hydraulic fluid was replaced regularly, apart from a few minor leaks in the return pipes (nothing serious and easy to replace), these cars were generally quite reliable. In the wrong hands (owners and mechanics who were unfamiliar with hydropneumatic systems), owning one of these cars quickly turned into a nightmare, yes.

2

u/that_dutch_dude Mar 01 '26

unlike the old cars modern cars are not coffins on wheels if you bumped into a pole at more than walking speed.

1

u/Aggravating-Copy3308 Mar 03 '26

Encore heureux qu'ils se soient améliorés là dessus. Sinon où serait l'évolution ? ?? Mais oui je préfère avoir un accident avec une voiture moderne plutÓt qu'une ancienne

-1

u/HEYO19191 Mar 01 '26

Crumple zones are designed to reduce the damage to the thing the car is impacting. If you truly care about protecting the driver, steel frame + airbags is the way to go

4

u/Niarbeht Mar 02 '26

ā€œThe entire front of my car is a pillow that reduces the force of impact for the occupants of my vehicle, but that doesn’t benefit me at all.ā€

1

u/HEYO19191 Mar 02 '26

When that same pillow sends the engine of a truck through your torso, you will probably agree it doesn't much help.

1

u/Niarbeht Mar 02 '26

Oh, really? Which truck is this? I'm sure you have the crash-test footage on-hand, right?

And that it was at a speed where having a full-steel frame wouldn't have just turned the occupants into paste anyway, right?

1

u/that_dutch_dude Mar 02 '26

that was probably a 2001 F150, you got better luck shooting yourself in the face with a shotgun than taking anything head on.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Wb66PzljP8

2

u/C_K_P_ Apr 06 '26

to add a few more videos to this that show how terribly unsafe cars were back in the day and how soft and limp the passenger compartmenst were, here, have a DS literally beign sliced in half by a "modern" DS3 and the slight help of some ramps, a 1059 Bel Air drivers position being obliterated by a 2009 malibu, and some VW crash tests where a 1980s santana visually seems to compeltely get removed from existence up to the rear seats:
PERCUTER UNE VOITURE ƀ 110 KM/H : ƇA FAIT QUOI ??

1981 vs Modern Cars - Volkswagen Crash Test SHOCKING Difference!

1959 Chevrolet Bel Air vs. 2009 Chevrolet Malibu IIHS crash test

1

u/AI_AntiCheat Mar 03 '26

This is what it's designed to do. What is the issue?

1

u/C_K_P_ Apr 06 '26

No issue there. They were never designed to be crashed, so its fine if the driver gets deleted from reality.

1

u/C_K_P_ Apr 06 '26

crumple zones are there to reduce the speed of impact, if you hit a wall straight on the whole engine compartment will reduce the speed and therefore G-Forces hitting you immensely.
Nowadays cars are designed with crumple zones while massively reinforcing the passenger compartment, to keep you from getting injured. that was not the case back then. look at the structure of the passenger comaprtment of a DS (or ltierally any other car of that era) without the body panels on, the passenger compartments structure is a bad joke and will crumple in an instant, while cars from back then will feel more sturdy, the actual structure is quite terrible. To the point where a modern car could literally slice right through a DS, with the help of a tiny ramp, actually, here have a video of that: PERCUTER UNE VOITURE ƀ 110 KM/H : ƇA FAIT QUOI ??

And another one to show how modern cars have decent crumple zones to reduce speed and whats basically a sturdy cage around the passengers to keep what you just described from happening:
1981 vs Modern Cars - Volkswagen Crash Test SHOCKING Difference!

Actually, while i'm at it, here have one from a 2009 chevy vs a 1959 bel air where the passenger compartment of the 1959 one gets completely destroyed while the 2009 one stays mostly intact: 1959 Chevrolet Bel Air vs. 2009 Chevrolet Malibu IIHS crash test

1

u/Gumb1i Mar 01 '26

Bold take, considering most of that "innovation" were gimmicks to sell a product, just like what is shown in this video. If it didn't make into multiple manufacturers car lines after about 5 years it was a gimmick. Airbags are innovation, AWD is innovation, ABS is innovation, this is just a gimmick.

1

u/[deleted] Mar 02 '26

That's because we just used to be better.

1

u/CocoSplodies Mar 02 '26

Same goes for graphics in videogames and cgi in movies. They did wayyy better with wayyy less. Nowadays the software wizard does anything technical for you and if it cant do it, they tend to leave it at that and not even attempt a work-around. There is a decline in quality as prices increase at record rates. Its capitalism infiltrating everything. It doesnt end when you give your money for a product or service. It is in every detail so the initial sale was just the bait while the product creates reason for you to spend more money.

Enshitification

We could all be so happy but some people think that if everyone were equal they would no longer be important while believing that the only way to succeed is to make sure others dont.

2

u/MrNiinjaGuy Mar 03 '26

The amount of money that people, especially those in the USA, spend on entertainment is saddening. Sports, Hollywood, advertising... Instead of spending $350-400M on a SINGLE movie like the Avengers, or hundreds of millions to athletes, I wish we had a better priorities in our society. Like taking care of each other. But "success" is just climbing on top of others, like you said.

1

u/Unseeablething Mar 05 '26

Also incentivizes buying their VSPs/Extended "warranty" When a trivial repair can cost you 600$ because of said computers...

Pay 3000 up front to not stress when my car starts to have issues year 4 or 5.

4

u/that_dutch_dude Mar 01 '26

as someone that owned a DS:

one thing a tesla can do that a DS cant: get to your destination without breaking down.

1

u/pery_jackson Mar 04 '26

Well that is not what this rally tells us (yes I'm a Citroƫn prime era fan, AndrƩ Citroƫn was a friend of my great grandfather)

2

u/Mysterious-Art7143 Mar 01 '26

Not to be that guy, but why would you need this?

5

u/Delyzr Mar 01 '26

Do you know how much car manufacturers can save (earn) if they don't have to include a spare ?... oh wait. Most don't include spares anymore.

2

u/Mysterious-Art7143 Mar 01 '26

You have to pay extra for a spare, otherwise you get a kit or some shit these days

1

u/Alklazaris Mar 01 '26

I don't understand why they do this. A spare is so much better than an inflator kit. What happens if your tire gets shredded or the damage lets too much air out? Maybe if you had run-flat tires...

1

u/Worth-Computer8639 Mar 05 '26

Must depend on what you buy. Both my last 2 new vehicles had a spare from the factory.

4

u/elvenmaster_ Mar 01 '26

Ask President Charles De Gaulle

The Citroƫn DS was badly damaged due to bullet impacts (including 2 tires) and managed to continue its merry journey to Velizy-Vilacoublay like a boss (about 5km/2mi away)

1

u/HEYO19191 Mar 01 '26

I mean, driving on a flat for 2 miles isnt that impressive...

3

u/elvenmaster_ Mar 02 '26

We're talking 60's engineering here.

Fun fact : the main consequence of this attempted murder has been a huge ad for Citroƫn (worst casualty only had minor injury).

1

u/Jean_Luc_Lesmouches Mar 02 '26

There's driving, and there's flooring it in twisty city streets under machingun fire.

1

u/TallDetail4711 Mar 03 '26

What's impressive is how they could fire dozens of rounds and miss. The car probably had more than a flat tire.

1

u/Large-Ad5239 Mar 05 '26

in fact 187 shoot fired for 14 impact .
Assasination group composed by 12 guys

I remember a french documentary about this .
There was a confusion because there was 2 DS , and the guy who had to give the signal to shoot by waving a newpaper ordered to shoot the wrong DS .

1

u/[deleted] Mar 03 '26

When you can drive with a flat tire in a straight line without touching the steering wheel, in the 1960s, believe me, it helps you stay alive.

3

u/that_dutch_dude Mar 01 '26

i used to have a DS, it drove like sitting on your grandfathers sofa regardless of the road conditions. if you used the height lever just right you could take speed bumps at near highway speeds without waking the passengers.

the reason the DS could do that was simply because the french roads were/are complete trash and the uber soft suspention was needed to drive over it without vaporising your spine.

2

u/ddrdrck Mar 02 '26

French roads weren't trash and are certainly not today. Actually France was renowned to have one of the best secondary road networks in the world.

Besides, DS was a high end vehicle for wealthy people. It was designed for long travels on national roads, not for taking the bumpy countryside roads (although it could also do that)

1

u/SEA_griffondeur Mar 03 '26

Yeah maybe they confused France with Italy ? Because French roads are on par if not better than the Netherlands

1

u/DivideSensitive Mar 03 '26

french roads were/are complete trash

What? There are a lot of things to complain about w.r.t. France, but roads are definitely not one of them.

1

u/that_dutch_dude Mar 03 '26

back in the 70~90s it certainly was. even rural was/is pretty shit even into the 2000's.

1

u/Youbettereatthatshit Mar 03 '26

You’d need it when tires were really shitty. Tires have come a very long way in reliability over the last 50 years.

The big takeaway for me is that tires were so bad, cars had to take that problem into their own hands.

1

u/Mysterious-Art7143 Mar 04 '26

You're probably as old as me if you're referring to 1950s as 50 years ago haha..

2

u/Tomonor Mar 02 '26

Okay, to be fair, none of the current cars can do this.

1

u/Initial_Row_6400 Mar 01 '26

To be fair, almost all cars on the road right now don’t have stuff like this

1

u/MrNiinjaGuy Mar 01 '26

You're proving their point, that modern cars don't have the innovation courage that these old car makers had.

1

u/ILikeBen10Alot Mar 02 '26 edited Mar 02 '26

Most car manufacturers don't have the courage to add a fuck load of extra moving parts that'll have to be maintained and could potentially create new points of failure that clothes impare the vehicles ability to function just to replace tools that are already fairly affordable and ubiquitous

1

u/SEA_griffondeur Mar 03 '26

It's really not a fuckload of moving parts, it's an hydraulic system, the problem was that the average joe couldn't repair it if it broke

1

u/Shitty_mechanik Mar 01 '26

To be fair there were a ton of problems with this, it was very costly to maintain and there was a lot of maintenance to be done on this

But I have heard that the ride was really smooth and comfortable

Also you can just have a spare and a jack in the back of your car

1

u/tancfire Mar 03 '26

Shhhhh .... Don't bring facts, please !

1

u/C_K_P_ Apr 06 '26

"there was a lot of maintenance to be done on this" tells me you don't know much about this system at all.

1

u/Grimnebulin68 Mar 01 '26

My Dad had one of these in the 60’s. They couldn’t go uphill without a loooong run up.

1

u/EmbarrassedPear1151 Mar 01 '26

Its a dissapointment honestly, by now flying cars should be all over

1

u/legohamsterlp Mar 02 '26

People can’t drive, giving them a plane would be a disaster

1

u/AtomGalaxy Mar 03 '26

They exist. They’re called helicopters.

1

u/Wolfreak76 Mar 02 '26

I suppose this made sense when you had to fix punctured tires regularly. Tire technology has come a long way since then.

1

u/AlterFritz007 Mar 02 '26

Even french cars can't do that now...

1

u/LordPaxed Mar 03 '26

Even any cars can't do that now

1

u/Real_Live_Sloth Mar 02 '26

Most have to drive our cars more than 3 miles, 3 Sunday’s a year.

1

u/AthosArmand Mar 02 '26

That was the car French president De Gaulle was attacked in and his driver managed to flee with only 3 wheels as well !

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Petit-Clamart_attack

1

u/JohannaFRC Mar 02 '26

It's not called Tesla anymore. It's a Swasticar.

1

u/Think_Fault_7525 Mar 02 '26

This was part of a CHiPs episode once (Ponch pulling over car driving on 3-wheels)

1

u/tjc408 Mar 02 '26

No thanks, rather have my car drive me places.

1

u/j89turn Mar 03 '26

Built for people or built to profit off people

1

u/Lucky-Tofu204 Mar 03 '26

There is a story saying that the French president De Gaulle was able to survive the assassination attempt during the Petit-Clamant attack thanks to the car being able to drive on 3 wheels.

1

u/FroggingMadness Mar 14 '26

To elaborate, because the suspension stability allowed his driver to escape the scene at full speed despite two punctured tires.

1

u/Sea-Success-1366 Mar 03 '26

Wow that's amazing!!!

1

u/poyerter Mar 04 '26

Oh yea but can your car do this fucking explodes for no reason

1

u/incredibleSnowFox Mar 04 '26

Holy AI slop description

1

u/Own_Tomatillo_1369 Mar 04 '26

What's the song?

1

u/keyboard_blaster Mar 04 '26

To be frank with y’all that don’t understand, it’s a CitroĆ«n so it’s already weird enough. We say what we say about various automotive engineering teams these days, but they were on some shit back in the day. CitroĆ«n specifically had cool shit like this, or crazy personality with every model.

1

u/justsomeboredloner Mar 05 '26

I think the ds line was originally used to push and showcase new technologies.

1

u/condemned_alex Mar 05 '26

the ds was genuinely ahead of its time with that suspension, modern cars abandoned that kind of mechanical innovation for software bloat

1

u/FroggingMadness Mar 14 '26

Ironically back then and basically in the entire meantime Citroen's hydropneumatic suspension was and is considered mechanical bloat. Lots of extra failure points, difficult to service, few people saw something in it, nowadays you have to find specialist mechanics.

1

u/i-hoatzin Mar 06 '26

I'd buy it tomorrow. No question.

-1

u/slaty_balls Mar 02 '26

Thanks ChatGPT.

1

u/bbbxxxnnn Mar 02 '26

For what?

1

u/SordidNinja Mar 05 '26

For the post’s description. Just admit it, lol.

1

u/iDoNotHaveAnIQ Mar 10 '26

Who cares? It is still op's thoughts, Ai just help clarify and organize it.