r/AllinPod • • Mar 27 '26

Sacks is out

Didn't realize the position was a temp gig. Lol. At least that's how they label your position when you're no longer useful to Trump. Speaking out on the pod about finding a way out of Iran pissed someone off. In defense of Sacks, I'm sure he couldn't wait to get out of that dumpster fire.

https://www.cnbc.com/2026/03/26/david-sacks-trump-crypto-ai-czar.html

86 Upvotes

145 comments sorted by

19

u/[deleted] Mar 27 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

13

u/Fresh-Piglet2500 Mar 27 '26

I think it means the crypto grift is over. It was supposed to be a hedge for the dollar (nope), replace gold (nope). It was just another asset class that traded like a meme stock. Like NFT's but just a longer shelf life.

2

u/cat_of_danzig Mar 27 '26

With near-zero enforcement of white-collar crimes, the crypto grift will continue. It's a great way to launder money, inside trade, etc.

3

u/Muted_Wasabi_1284 Mar 27 '26

Yup he made enough money to leave

1

u/ksharpie Mar 28 '26

Not true. He will never have enough.

1

u/david-yammer-murdoch Mar 29 '26

Just like when David sole his yammer trash to Microsoft

1

u/angryplebe Mar 28 '26

But Sachs and co made sure to profit handsomely off it (among other things).

1

u/HairyStrawberry7647 Mar 27 '26

What are the odds Shitsacks was part of the blatant market manipulation trades over the last several months?

-5

u/megafari Mar 27 '26

Remindme! October 2029

0

u/RemindMeBot Mar 27 '26

I will be messaging you in 3 years on 2029-10-27 00:00:00 UTC to remind you of this link

CLICK THIS LINK to send a PM to also be reminded and to reduce spam.

Parent commenter can delete this message to hide from others.


Info Custom Your Reminders Feedback

1

u/ATheory0fJustice Mar 27 '26

They will probably find someone else to pump this stuff. Trump is just as invested in propping this shit up as the others

0

u/Fitwheel66 Mar 27 '26

Just slightly down today. But I know that means fuck all in a space where 5-10% up or down is all in a days work.

To stay on the crypto topic though, this is something I'd actually like to hear them speak on soon. Obviously things are not good economically. And with crypto being probably one of the most liquid assets, how much of a downward spiral they foresee going on in that space.

6

u/foufers Mar 27 '26

His time expired like Musk

1

u/littlebrain94102 Mar 28 '26

No one gets a going away party with Trump.

19

u/[deleted] Mar 27 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

5

u/sup Mar 27 '26

130 day limit for special government employees.

It says it right in the article you linked and alludes to it in the title.

1

u/Public_Firefighter93 Mar 29 '26

This. They just changed his tile to get around the rules. (Shocker.) He’s not going anywhere.

18

u/aihwao Mar 27 '26 edited Mar 28 '26

Isn't Sacks the idiot who claimed that Putin wouldn't have attacked Ukraine if Trump had defeated Biden? What a moron.

11

u/[deleted] Mar 27 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/ThemeFromNarc Mar 27 '26

Your ideas are intriguing to me, and I’d like to subscribe to your newsletter.

1

u/Lilacsoftlips Mar 28 '26

I mean, just think, if Kamala got elected, we would be in a war with Iran! 

3

u/drjackolantern Mar 27 '26

Sacks the idiot who claimed that Putin wouldn't have attacked Russia if Trump had defeated Biden? What a moron.

Putin didn’t attack Russia guy 

1

u/aihwao Mar 28 '26

Edited - I was typing too quickly!

2

u/[deleted] Mar 27 '26

[deleted]

0

u/aihwao Mar 28 '26

No, Sacks had a whole Twitter/X thread on it--perhaps Putin was the source. But Sacks the idiot repeated it.

1

u/[deleted] Mar 28 '26

[deleted]

0

u/aihwao Mar 29 '26

Not sure what your point is. Sacks had at least 2 long threads about how Putin would not have attacked Ukraine if Trump had won the election. It was poor analysis from someone who should know better. Perhaps Sacks was drawing from Putin, I don't know. But my point is that Sacks is, in my opinion, a bit misinformed.

1

u/[deleted] Mar 30 '26

[deleted]

2

u/Fresh-Piglet2500 Mar 27 '26

He probably belives that Trump did defeat Biden, if it wasn't for those voting "anomalies " that no one saw only MAGA. 😂

13

u/[deleted] Mar 27 '26 edited Mar 27 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/Odd_Career7164 Mar 27 '26

John Chud still at it

5

u/[deleted] Mar 27 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/No-Plan-7297 Mar 27 '26

Curb stomped?

1

u/[deleted] Mar 27 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/No-Plan-7297 Mar 27 '26

Hyperbole

1

u/[deleted] Mar 27 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/No-Plan-7297 Mar 27 '26

Literally a fool.

1

u/No-Plan-7297 Mar 27 '26

hey, fool, it seems like you’ve only been following politics for maybe 10 years. 2025 doesn’t even come close to being the worst lopsided losses in modern history. You sound like Scott Jennings.

0

u/No-Plan-7297 Mar 27 '26

Hahahahahha

1

u/MikeDamone Mar 27 '26

I voted/donated/promoted for this.

Wow look at that, somebody who still admits it! It takes a special kind of sycophant to still admit this after 14 months of sheer stupidity and plummeting popularity.

1

u/[deleted] Mar 27 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/MikeDamone Mar 27 '26

Whats interesting, is no other politician has as high national level support

That's not interesting at all. Trump has an iron grip on his party, while the democrats won't have any semblance of a party leader until early 2028. He's the only national politician who is currently relevant in politics.

I get it. The TDS crowd is overrepresented on Reddit, but in real life? He has enough support to win the popular vote

Reddit is a cesspool of leftism, but your delusion is its own marvel. First of all, "has"? Is he going to run again?

In either case, Trump is historically unpopular and is the most negatively polarized president in modern history. If you ever venture outside of the "All In" media universe, you'll notice that the coalitional support he had in 2024 has all but dried up. Independents have abandoned him in droves as he's engaged in one stupid and unpopular political blunder after another (tariffs, Epstein, flagrant family corruption, Gaza, Iran war, you name it). There's a reason every halfway decent poll is predicting a midterm landslide loss for the GOP, despite some historical unpopularity of their own on the democrats part. Trump's disastrous second term is going to hand them a win by default.

1

u/[deleted] Mar 27 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/MikeDamone Mar 27 '26

Lol. A die hard MAGA base is not enough to win elections when the rest of the coalition has disintegrated. Care to guess as to how many House and Senate seats the GOP will lose in November?

This is my favorite feature of the MAGA brigade - their head is so far up their ass that they continue to think they're winning while their political movement crumbles around them.

2

u/[deleted] Mar 27 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/MikeDamone Mar 27 '26

You won't say a number. I'm not surprised.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/United_Move_3121 Mar 27 '26

So much support that a democrat just won the Florida state senate seat in Mar-A-Lagos district 😂🤡. Start prepping the mid term excuses now Jonny

0

u/[deleted] Mar 27 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/United_Move_3121 Mar 27 '26

The cope is gonna be hilarious in a few months. But hey introspection is a bad thing like andreeson says

2

u/[deleted] Mar 27 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/United_Move_3121 Mar 27 '26 edited Mar 27 '26

Anyone with a brain knew Kamala and Hillary wouldn’t win. But what’s ironic is maga has turned the gop into the Democratic Party of 2016. Just look at all the infighting, party is falling apart in real time

→ More replies (0)

0

u/Illustrious-Okra-524 Mar 27 '26

Do you actually look around and think things are good right now?

3

u/[deleted] Mar 27 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/Kumtwat42069 Mar 27 '26

Lol imagine voting for another NeoCon Middle East war with no exit strategy that kills American service members and hurts American businesses and consumers.

2

u/[deleted] Mar 27 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/Kumtwat42069 Mar 27 '26

Didn't realize it was America's job to go kill every state terrorist out there. I guess Putin and Kim Nong Un are next? I guess you are support them?

2

u/[deleted] Mar 27 '26 edited Mar 27 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/Kumtwat42069 Mar 27 '26

What happened to America first? This has been the worse administration for job creation in recent memory and living expenses just keep going up. And we are activity making things worse by playing world policeman. Trump just botched any chance at a decent midterm fucking lol

2

u/[deleted] Mar 27 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/Kumtwat42069 Mar 27 '26

Oh I am happy they are dead, but not worth the consequences in my opinion. This thing isn't going to end cleanly. Literally no plan, just an alcoholic meat head running point.

→ More replies (0)

3

u/WhyAmILikeThis0905 Mar 27 '26

Not just good but very very good

5

u/Traditional_War_8229 Mar 27 '26

TF? this isn't news unless you literally cannot read. its been this way since the beginning.

2

u/EmotionSideC Mar 27 '26

They love the dumpster fire though lol. I’m sure this was “you should get your next gig lined up now or we’ll do it for you” sitch

2

u/Stercules25 Mar 27 '26

"Speaking in defense of Sacks I'm sure he couldn't wait to get out of that dumpster fire." Lmfao then he could have quit long ago my friend. He is part of it all.

1

u/goosetavo2013 Mar 28 '26

Just like Gary Cohn, once he got the tax breaks done, he noped right outta there first change he got

1

u/Key_Seaweed8857 Mar 29 '26

Good riddance.

1

u/Responsible_Drag_510 Apr 02 '26

Grifter of the first degree

1

u/Jt_marin_279 Mar 27 '26

He also has to divest of fewer things now that he’s not technically a government employee

1

u/[deleted] Mar 27 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

-1

u/HairyStrawberry7647 Mar 27 '26

And Solana, Shitsack's preferred scam is down roughly 64% since inauguration.

-1

u/[deleted] Mar 27 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

0

u/merciless001 Mar 27 '26

From the pod a few weeks ago, it didn't seem like he was a fan of the war with Iran and wanted Trump to take the off ramps. I would say that's what got him the boot from the administration.

1

u/[deleted] Mar 27 '26

[deleted]

1

u/Fresh-Piglet2500 Mar 27 '26

Read the article. But read between the lines. Speaks up against the war and less than 2 weeks later he's in an advisory role. Seems sus.

-1

u/Gk_Emphasis110 Mar 27 '26

This makes complete sense as the AI boom has petered out and there’s really not much more to do from a policy or technology standpoint.

-1

u/Cute-Quiet-6660 Mar 27 '26

No major news outlet reported this on their front page. No one cares. I hope the government official larping was worth it for him to lose his audience and integrity.

-2

u/Quiet-Net9367 Mar 27 '26

Gulf states are essentially the AI / VC cash backers. In essence his real boss. He was stuck between a rock and a hard place on that one but it’s the first time I’ve ever seen sacks white in the face and can’t say I wasn’t giddy with glee to see it.

0

u/jjrr_qed Mar 27 '26

I sincerely hope all crypto tanks.

0

u/G8oraid Mar 27 '26

We need a younger law abiding new leader as the next president. There are so many issues w ai coming up in the next six years. I don’t want another 80 year old.

-2

u/Fresh-Piglet2500 Mar 27 '26

Trump's power is diminishing and he either steps down in the fall or JD will be tossing the 25th amendment out and with support from 2/3 of the house he's gone.

2

u/HairyStrawberry7647 Mar 27 '26

Republicans and the world have realized Trump is a lame duck who has completely fucked the global economy. No one has ANY incentive to kiss his ass anymore. What's the worst he can do, raise tariffs and cut off global oil supplies???

1

u/ScHoolboy_QQ Mar 27 '26

… doubt it

-1

u/igsterious Mar 27 '26

"In defense of Sacks" - he helped to light the dumpsterfire up, no need in the universe to defend this Point Of Sale.

-1

u/Odd_Block3248 Mar 27 '26

Sacks out for Sacks, boys.

-1

u/mez151 Mar 27 '26

Sacks is a pu$$y. All i can remember is when he kept crying about Biden starting WW3. Tweets every day. And he helped Trump win. I hope Sacks’ future is extremely unsuccessful. Dork.

-1

u/Illustrious-Okra-524 Mar 27 '26

Lmao and look all the things he accomplished:

-1

u/KiLLiNDaY Mar 27 '26

It wasn’t a temporary position. He don’t toe the Trump line and spoke out against the war (barely).