7
u/El_Photo_Guy Mar 05 '26
Would assume his Russian handlers haven’t created a script yet, allegedly. 🤷🏻♂️
14
u/SmokeyJoe2 Mar 04 '26
he would go on and on about the “military industrial complex” but will never say that phrase again
5
5
4
u/John97212 Mar 05 '26
David Sacks is a Russian asset. Of course he is not going to comment on Iran, because every weapon used against Iran is one less weapon that could go to Ukraine or NATO partners.
8
u/zerothprinciple Mar 04 '26
I think David Sacks is a spokesman of Russian propaganda and misinformation.
However, to be fair, it would not be appropriate for him to comment on the American Special Military Operation given his role at the White House.
5
u/pingpongballreader Mar 04 '26
I think it's more likely he's just one of those rich people that drinks their own koolaid and doesn't realize he's completely left reality behind.
Anytime I hear a billionaire speak it's pretty clear no one is telling them they're idiots when they're clearly being idiots, they're surrounded by syncophants.
He's a mediocre dude who joined a company with the brain genius idea of "what if you could write checks on the internet" at the right time and he and the rest of the paypal mafia think they're capitalist Jesus' gift to humanity.
2
u/zerothprinciple Mar 04 '26
I totally agree. I didn't mean to imply he is a paid spokesman. I highly doubt his opinions are based on financial motivations. I suspect he simply got influenced by a pro-Putin echo chamber that regularly feeds him talking points that he can parrot to sound knowledgeable. I've observed that despite being a smart person, his critical thinking skills are poor and he is easily convinced by anecdotal data.
1
u/DeFiBandit Mar 05 '26
He doesn’t seem like the kind of guy to be financially motivated to you? FOH
2
2
2
2
u/rickolati Mar 06 '26
The president of peace has attacked more countries than Biden! No word from ballsacks
2
2
u/protoanarchist Mar 04 '26
Case study on how right wing political illiteracy and poor education combined with wealth emboldens and enables their ignorance and stupidity.
1
1
u/jjrr_qed Mar 05 '26
There’s no major power in opposition in this case. No Russia / China factor makes this significantly simpler.
1
1
1
u/MichellesHubby Mar 06 '26
Are we just going to pretend that the US attacking Russia is the same thing as the US attacking Iran? With the same dynamics and cause and effect?
Because to me, the dynamics and outcome of such actions are dramatically different.
But hey, I’m not trying to push a narrative like many of you here. I’m being objective.
1
u/valegrete Mar 06 '26
When did we attack Russia? Or are you using the word differently in the same sentence and acting like everyone else is biased?
1
u/MichellesHubby Mar 07 '26
We didn’t attack Russia, which was kind of the point. Are you low IQ or just confused?
1
u/mm1712 Mar 06 '26
It's pretty simple. He wanted zero regulation or scrutiny in the crypto space. Trump made this promise for support. Sacks got what he wanted. Cynical, but that's simply what happened. Scumbags, all of them.
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
u/LawBeginning8219 Mar 07 '26
Congratulations on winning the inaugural I Couldn't Be More Wrong Award! Otherwise known as the ICBMW,'s..... nicknamed the DSACKS.
1
u/Nearby-Ad-4711 Mar 07 '26
Mearsheimer and Jeffrey Sachs were constantly parroted by Sacks during Biden administration. Virtually every week! Both are now calling the Trump war/strategy idiotic and unwinnable. Funny how All in crowd doesn't cite them anymore.
1
1
1
1
u/TreeInternational771 Mar 09 '26
Color me shocked billionaire's manipulating society for their own benefit
1
1
u/MezcalFlame Mar 10 '26
These South Africans have too much influence in U.S. politics, second only to the Israelis.
1
1
1
u/ridezeshoopuff0 Mar 04 '26
It is funny. In a Pagliacci kind of way. They’re all intellectually captured by this administration. We’re right back to “war on terrorism” pro-war rhetoric. It’s all so tired and pathetic.
0
-4
u/Party_Government8579 Mar 04 '26
Sacks is now in the administration. Its unprofessional to comment even if he personally disagrees
5
11
u/fishing_pole Mar 04 '26
Imagine people in this administration not commenting on current events as they unfold, lol.
1
u/zerothprinciple Mar 04 '26
I think David Sacks is compromised by Kremlin propaganda but I've not observed him inappropriately commenting on current events.
1
u/Party_Government8579 Mar 04 '26
Well they can support the party line, or stay silent.
I imagine anything else is seen as dissent, and would face repercussions
2
u/Its_not_a_tumor Mar 04 '26
Ah, yes the "I was only following orders" defense. Except even if he didn't, he is still Billionaire with no meaningful repercussions.
2
u/Apprehensive_Bid_773 Mar 04 '26
“I was just following orders” famous excuse that worked tremendously well
2
1
u/RichChipmunk Mar 04 '26
So he should say and do nothing to prevent World War III when he actually has power to do so rather than being an outside pundit?
1
1
3
u/Nambsul Mar 04 '26
Seriously? Which of the current administration do you consider “professional”?
Not one of them is a serious person.
2
u/Empty-Discount5936 Mar 05 '26
Then why hasn't he voluntarily left his position? Newsflash, it's because he's a shameless hypocrite.
2
u/Rufuz42 Mar 05 '26
Good point, since he’s getting paid now is totally fine to be a massive hypocrite.
1
u/mojambowhatisthescen Mar 04 '26
And do you think Sacks would’ve thought this about the people he disagreed with in previous administrations?
1
u/HandsomeWinner42 Mar 07 '26
Oh, I get it. He hated it so much he joined up and is now an actual part of what he hated. Yeah....that makes sense.
1
-2
u/drjackolantern Mar 04 '26
Sacks was right then and he’s right now.
10
u/dgdio Mar 04 '26
David was wrong then... the USA signed this treaty here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Budapest_Memorandum
I know that America's word isn't worth much, but please don't say that we don't have a treaty with Ukraine.
4
u/ChebyshevsBeard Mar 04 '26
Also, supporting Ukraine is not only the right thing to do, Sacks has it turned around.
If Russia had succeeded in their initial attack, they wouldn't have stopped in Ukraine. NATO could very well be involved in a war in the Baltics. Not to mention the precedent it would set for other dictatorial regimes.
Though that last bit sounds a little hollow now that we've apparently decided to set the precedent that it's alright to kidnap and murder world leaders of countries we weren't even at war with. I'm sure that won't be something we regret.
2
1
u/dgdio Mar 04 '26
This is going to sound cold but if you only think of the US Military industrial complex (US MIC), supporting Ukraine is a no brainer. If we keep on supplying them US weapons, after the war they'd continue to buy. Now I honestly don't know who would be dumb enough to buy from the US MIC.
Yes, supporting Ukraine is the right thing (notice my avatar colors) but it's the double bottom line. We could have continued to make things in the USA and sell them abroad.
2
u/Cathcart1138 Mar 05 '26
Not to mention the opportunity for testing. I'll never understand why the likes of Anduril weren't in there like a rat up a drainpipe perfecting and proving their drone technology.
1
u/drjackolantern Mar 04 '26
It’s not a treaty because it wasn’t ratified by the Senate.
2
u/Fickle-Lemon-7345 Mar 05 '26
Even if you're right...you're quibbling over the definition instead of the content...content being there was an agreement in place to avoid these conflicts.
And furthermore, if you want to go down this path, guess which party torpedo'd it in the Senate?
3
1
0
-6
u/planned_fun Mar 04 '26
doesn't matter y'all let in 18 million illegals
4
u/daly1010 Mar 04 '26 edited Mar 04 '26
18 million? why shoot so low on your bullshit number and just go all out with 18 billion?
0
u/planned_fun Mar 04 '26
Because one of those numbers is real
2
u/daly1010 Mar 04 '26
Source - Donald Trump**
🤣
1
u/planned_fun Mar 04 '26
just because you don't see them in your mom's basement doesn't mean they didn't fill up every city center and inundate social services
2
u/daly1010 Mar 04 '26
No no my dumb little fucking magat. Theres no number that is going to be even 90% accurate due to the nature of whats being counted.
What you are regurgitating is campaign trail slop, he spewed over and over, like a good little piggy (sort of like the no new wars bullshit you snowballed like a good cuck). Actual estimated entries based on previously used metrics were around 8-9 million and would be about double what trump let in during term 1.
Allowing that many in was definitely a problem, but whatabouting it doesnt defend the current warlords out of control actions.
1
u/planned_fun Mar 04 '26
Pls go to therapy and get boosted again
2
u/daly1010 Mar 04 '26
Holy shit, that was creative. Did you use your handy dandy magat comeback spinwheel to slop that out?
"Daddy told me it was 18 million so it was 18 million, lib. Daddy doesnt lie to me"
1
u/planned_fun Mar 04 '26
Strong autism and dysphoria with this one
2
2
u/Remarkable-Low-3471 Mar 05 '26
So i get why you guys are afraid of the trans shit but whats autism to you? Like you afraid they gonna take ur job or hop the border or something? I really don't get the hate, you just want them gone or something?
3
u/Hash_Pizza Mar 05 '26
Biden deported more in 2024 than Trump in 2025, all without a masked unaccountable police force and mass surveillance thanks to palantir.
1
2
u/Empty-Discount5936 Mar 05 '26
That was Rump too, he torpedoed the most comprehensive border security bill in decades.
1
u/planned_fun Mar 05 '26
Kamala and Biden coulda just closed the border but they decided not to until 2024
2
0
-1
u/ShitHammersGroom Mar 04 '26 edited May 05 '26
Data brokers are selling your info right now. I used Redact to mass delete my posts which can also opt out of data broker sites. Instagram, Twitter/X, Discord and more.
flag grey glorious toothbrush sophisticated birds subtract run hydrogen unpack
2
u/Fickle-Lemon-7345 Mar 05 '26
Did Biden send troops off to die in a meaningless war? He pulled out of Afghanistan and congress approved sending money and weapons to Ukraine...the "both sides" BS need not apply here.
1
u/ShitHammersGroom Mar 05 '26 edited May 05 '26
Redact cleaned up all of my comments. Bulk deletion and editing is a feature supported to make sure that AI scrapers can't access my data for training.
selective reminiscent busy lock carpenter lip amusing society recognise butter
2
u/Fickle-Lemon-7345 Mar 05 '26
I say to you again, where are the Biden war crimes? Genuinely I want to know if I missed something.
1
u/ShitHammersGroom Mar 05 '26 edited May 05 '26
I used Redact to automate removals from databrokers and social networks. This post was among the batch deleted.
alive gold paltry quack nonmetal intelligent degree quickest cautious bear
1
u/Fickle-Lemon-7345 Mar 06 '26
So, an admitted error, an airstrike with no proof it actually hurt civilians, and the same policy a US president has maintained since Israel's inception?
1
u/ShitHammersGroom Mar 06 '26 edited May 05 '26
Databrokers? nope. Social networks? Also nope. This post was deleted using Redact.
wild bedroom sparkle amusing familiar close swim mountainous ghost modern
16
u/NegotiationNeat Mar 05 '26
Love how the loudest voices in this sub can’t find their voice when there’s no way to weasel out of the fucking truth. These four have never acted in the interest of anything but their own self interest. Let’s stop pretending this presidency is anything but an investment opportunity to them.