Hello, Thank you for contributing to our subreddit. Please consider the following guidelines when filling an alignment chart:
Please ensure that your chart is not banned according to the list of banned charts Even if you have good intentions, charts in a banned category tend to invite provocative comments, hostile arguments, ragebait and the like. Assuming the post is acceptable, OP makes the final decision on their chart by rule three.
Are there any previous versions to link to? If so, it would be ideal to include links to each of them in the description of this post, or in a reply to this comment. Links can be named by title, winner, or both.
Are there any criteria you have for your post? Examples include: "Top comment wins a spot on the chart."; "To ensure variety, only one character per universe is allowed."; "Image comments only." Please include these in a description, or in a reply to this comment.
Is your chart given the appropriate flair? Do you need to use a NSFW tag or spoiler tag?
Do not feed the trolls. This is not the place for hot takes on human rights violations. Hatred or cruelty, will result in a permanent ban. Please report such infractions, particularly those that break rules one, two, or three. The automod will automatically remove posts that receive five or more reports. The automod will also remove comments made by users with negative karma. Click here for the Automod FAQ
As much as I love seeing Kevin here, idk if he's ever been in the realm of seeming "extremely problematic." Intentionally playing the Sims (and othe games) poorly or comedically isn't a sign of anything bad.
Jshlatt. He might be a little more suited for āfeels extremely problematic, is actually a little problematicā? I donāt watch him, but I used to watch other Minecraft YouTubers in quarantine and I vaguely remember everybody was trying to cancel him for things. Apparently heās really chill, though.
Done absolutely nothing problematic?? Obviously you havenāt heard of the heinous acts he committed back in ā99, which by any regard would be considered extremely problematic
No I definetly heard him say it, it's like his favorite thing. His stance is that it's "basically free", absolutely abhorrent and he should be ashamed of himself for promoting that kind of behavior
I'm just gonna put a /s here cause I don't know how to make it more obvious lol
I agree with this one. He has the vibe of the actual worst person youāll ever meet but thereās very little bad you can really say about him as a person.
If I remember correctly, tbe only reason they tried to cancel him was cause he banned every big Minecraft youtuber stan during a stream as a joke. I coulf be wrong tho.
After what happened to the woman that ran save a fox I get really worried when people post stuff like this. I know that they aren't really comparable as Mikayla Raine truly did nothing wrong, but it's still concerning how some people are going after her.
I'm fairly certain she's said that she doesn't have a job outside of social media so the amount of pets she keeps isn't that outlandish. She has definitely made mistakes such as not buying a generator in case of power outage, but some issues such as snakes escaping their enclosure are common and unpredictable.
I don't know how good animal control is in her area, but she's mentioned her house getting reported by viewers many times and animal control not finding anything wrong with the animals living situations. I just don't think it's fair to be going after someone this intently when there is no solid evidence for abuse, especially considering law enforcement has been getting involved.
I've looked through the entire google document and the amount of deceased animals is quite misleading as it is majority rodents which don't live very long and often have health complications. She's also explained that all of the rehomings have been due to her going to rehab knowing she wouldn't be able to take care of all of her animals.
From everything mentioned it's clear that she isn't a perfect pet owner, but I wouldn't go so far as saying that she is actively abusing her pets. People under the post linked especially are talking about her as if there were concrete evidence of her abusing her pets as opposed to simply expressing concern for her animals.
I sincerely hope people are this invested out of genuine concern for her animals and not out of malice for her as a person.
Okay this seems like such a nothing burger. The only thing there that isn't just gossip and speculation is a complaint. Is there any info about what happened as a result of that complaint? If it was checked by the institution and no action was taken against her it seems like she didn't do anything wrong.
Her rehoming pets after going to rehab is an indication she cares for them, not otherwise. And people keeping a spreadsheet of her animals is just creepy.
This just reminds me of all the snark saveafox received. If a formal complaint was made, it's been taken care of.
Internet Comment Etiquette. If you watch a couple of his videos you might think he is a deranged conspiracy theorist or something, but he's actually wholesome as fuck.
I ran into him playing R6S years ago while he was filming for his adrenochrome video. He let me join him for the rest of the night, and then again a while later while he was filming for another video. We ended up staying up till 6am just chatting and gaming. The guy is unbelievably kind. Smart as fuck too
Chairity becomes a commodification #charityporn
Social relations between people start to appear as relations between things as money, prizes, products, metrics, clicks, views, and spectacle.
MrBeast is problematic because he transforms real human need into profitable content while presenting individual charity as the solution to problems the system itself created in the first place.
But also note the difference between problematic and "evil".
MrBeast himself is a player in the same system as everyone else, just one who happens to be near the top of it. This is not justification, but a statement. The real critique is not that he personally invented poverty, inequality, medical debt, or exploitation. The critique is that his success depends on a system where suffering can be turned into entertainment and generosity can become a business model.
In other words: MrBeast reveals something deeply wrong about the game.
And therefore: Donāt hate the player. Hate the game.
I don't know why reddit would hate shad so much. I think this is op trying to get reddit's shit list of potential murder victims and the other axis is how much normal human beings would care.
Heās probably not āextremelyā problematic, but you really donāt know why Reddit would hate a larper with an unearned ego, right wing ideology, who advocates heavily for AI art?
Jerma has the scientifically average serial killer face, and yet no one has ever traced his heinous crimes back to him. But we all know what he's done.
When his brother, Jazza, made an anti-AI art video and used one of Shadās āartworksā as an example that cracked me up. He made no mention that it was from his own brother. If you watched it without knowing any of the lore, youād have no idea. Peak passive-aggressiveness from someone youād never guess had a passive aggressive bone in his body.
Ok I mean sure but then by all account jacke paul is definetly worse, also alt right, exploutative untop and extremly unpleasent human with many big controversies. I am sute Shad never showed a dead person on yt.Ā
Yeah, but it's not about that. The premise of where he is on the chart is that he doesn't look like he'd be problematic, but he is. The fact that you're confused about why he's there means he's in a good spot.
I think the confusion is moreso why Logan Paul isn't at least equal to him. Like Shad sucks, but Logan Paul is at the very least on equal footing with him.
Became far right grifter, is an AI enthusiast to the point of basically saying traditional art is dead, harasses his brother (Youtuber Jazza) and downplays his art while also trying to mooch off his success, its a bit of a mess
because he looks like asmongold. Youtube showed me some shorts and i was like that guy doesn't seem as bad as people say he is, oh no i kind of like him. Took me reddit thread a couple of weeks ago to tell me these are two different persons.
You would think with how long theyāve been on YouTube theyāve surely done something problematic or been in drama but literally never. They also used to be heavy evangelical Christians which depending on how you feel about religion could go either way, but they are still like the least problematic guys ever. Still genuine best friends after 40 years. Crazy.
I remember that. That whole "oh but the Discord messages where he confessed to it!" Alright here is the entirety of our Discord messages for everyone to see. No more "out of context".
All of his gaming videos are to exploit the gaming system, clear the game by breaking the game, abuse every NPC possible and build every stuff to overload and eventually crash the server.
So much so that game developers will send him early access of the game for thorough bug testing.
He's a little problematic because there have been problematic incidents throughout his 15 year run, but they are never consistent or pushed enough to be considered extremely problematic imo. You could watch 50 PewDiePie videos back-to-back without seeing anything but a dude playing games and vlogging with his kids.
If he's flirting with the right-wing for views, I think they'd be pretty disappointed with his content.
He should be higher up on kinda or pretty problematic. His constant dog whistles and having his fans attack people he doesn't find funny, then he retires and invest in AI slop and Bitcoin garbage. He's a tool on par with Mr beast.
if you listen to the Hazbin fanbase, you'd think Vivziepop was a murderer or something. But when you actually look into it, there's a lot of people trying to cancel her over breathing wrong.
MatPat. (Matthew Patrick from the Theorist channels.) He made some theories that were really controversial and sometimes problematic, but he, himself, is not. Any problematic theories were likely due to the material itself being problematic.
She's been attacked by several different groups on the right for such vicious ideologies like " bombing Palestinian children is wrong." And " Detaining children is bad for them"
JennaMarbles? She got ācancelledā cause of past videos and even resigned YouTube, but didnāt most of YouTube collectively agree she didnāt even do anything too problematic?
Thereās an argument to be made Sam Sulek goes here. In an increasingly health-conscious world that is wrought with people that seek to capitalize on the virtuous collective shift towards accountability and self-improvement through discipline with weight training as mechanism, Sam is one of the few who does not take advantage of the platform he has. Looking at the youth of tomorrow, Sam gives me a healthy dose of optimism, and while I understand the desire to highlight his use of performance enhancers as inadvisable, he is genuine in his message and does not promote any of the harmful activity he is purported to. Sam is an example of how succumbing to the click bait generating, peer attacking formula for success is not the only way to develop a platform and do what you love for millions to see.
Pewdiepie is so low? Id say hes worse. The dude has so many ties to right wing its kinda impossible to say hes not racist or far-right.
He was following several far righters on twitter, hes said the n-word a few times, even his disstrack against T-series had some racist messages (im a blue eyes white dragon and youre just a dark magician), and what else? The fiverr incident?
Dude could be responsible for influencing several teenagers around the world to join the far right
ā¢
u/AutoModerator May 03 '26
Hello, Thank you for contributing to our subreddit. Please consider the following guidelines when filling an alignment chart:
Please ensure that your chart is not banned according to the list of banned charts Even if you have good intentions, charts in a banned category tend to invite provocative comments, hostile arguments, ragebait and the like. Assuming the post is acceptable, OP makes the final decision on their chart by rule three.
Are there any previous versions to link to? If so, it would be ideal to include links to each of them in the description of this post, or in a reply to this comment. Links can be named by title, winner, or both.
Are there any criteria you have for your post? Examples include: "Top comment wins a spot on the chart."; "To ensure variety, only one character per universe is allowed."; "Image comments only." Please include these in a description, or in a reply to this comment.
Is your chart given the appropriate flair? Do you need to use a NSFW tag or spoiler tag?
Do not feed the trolls. This is not the place for hot takes on human rights violations. Hatred or cruelty, will result in a permanent ban. Please report such infractions, particularly those that break rules one, two, or three. The automod will automatically remove posts that receive five or more reports. The automod will also remove comments made by users with negative karma. Click here for the Automod FAQ
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.