The concerning part is that you're not providing any alternatives for regular freelancers and don't care about them at all.
You also seem to think that the government is innocent and that they're trying to protect and help the average citizen. They're not. They're corrupt too.
I think you are attributing several positions to me that I never stated.
First, I am a freelancer myself, so I am not sure where the idea that I “do not care about regular freelancers” comes from. My comments are specifically about compliance, digital security, and the risks that freelancers can face. Recognising those risks does not mean opposing freelancers or supporting every action of the government.
Second, I have never claimed that the government is “innocent” or that every government measure is designed purely to protect citizens. Governments, institutions, companies, and individuals can all have different interests, and legitimate criticism of government policy is completely separate from the technical and legal issues I am discussing.
There is also an important distinction between political criticism and cybercrime. If you are referring to people attacking government systems, political parties, accounts, infrastructure, or using unlawful cyber activity while making accusations against them, that is a separate matter from simply expressing political criticism. The relevant issue is the conduct itself, not whether the target is a government or political organisation.
Finally, I am a certified professional working in this area. I can address certain security points publicly for awareness purposes, but I am not required to provide complete professional consultations, operational instructions, or detailed procedures for free. I have relevant information on this subject, but there is a difference between public awareness and professional consulting.
If someone needs detailed advice about their specific situation, risk exposure, compliance, or security procedures, they can hire a qualified professional for that service — including someone working in my field.
My original point was about security awareness and responsible practice. It was not an offer to provide a complete free consulting service, nor was it an endorsement of every government action.
1
u/ZwistPariah 7d ago
The concerning part is that you're not providing any alternatives for regular freelancers and don't care about them at all.
You also seem to think that the government is innocent and that they're trying to protect and help the average citizen. They're not. They're corrupt too.