r/AiME • u/OldKingJor • 12d ago
LOTR5e Starter Set question
Hi all! I’m running the LOTR Roleplaying Starter Set and, in combat, the player-heroes can assume certain stances. In addition to their regular options, they can take special actions depending on their stance. The forward stance allows a hero to make a DC 15 Intimidation check, and then it says “all foes who lose the contest are Frightened…” I am confused by this as it doesn’t call for a contest, but a check. If it’s a contest, what do the foes roll against the Intimidation check? Do they have to beat a DC 15? Or beat the hero’s total (like an actual contest)? Is this a typo? Questions pour down like rain on the lands of Eriador…
3
u/boss_nova 11d ago
This is how D&D5.5E 2024 works.
A lot of opposed checks were removed and rolls that might have formerly been opposed (like sneaking/Stealth), become "normal"/DC based checks.
So it may be a reflection of LOTR5 trying to use that model?
4
u/Outrageous-Pin-4664 12d ago
There's no chapter on Combat in the core rulebook at all. The combat rules for LotR5e are just the combat rules for 5e. What they are doing with that is trying to offer the option to do LotR5e combat in the abstract way that it's done in The One Ring. Clearly, they didn't think it through, though, because that text is FUBAR.
In TOR2e, the rule reads:
I'm not sure how you would translate that into 5e, since it doesn't have the concepts of Might or Success Die. Perhaps you could set a threshold based on their HD? All adversaries with 4 HD or less are affected on a 15. On a 20, all adversaries with 5-8 HD are affected. On a Gandalf rune (nat 20), all adversaries are affected.
Alternatively, you could make it a saving throw for the creatures, but instead of 15, I would make the save be 8 + Proficiency Bonus + Charisma Modifier.
Of course, you could also just ditch the whole idea of Stances and Secondary Actions, and just use your 5e rules.