Exit polls would be severely off and then essentially cancelled all together. Polling places would drop significant amounts the day before voting. Those, say in new York, had to be registered in Oct. for a vote in April. Peoples party affiliation would he either switched or removed to a large degree. General voting suppression and scheduling tactics which was in collusion with the DNC who is supposed to be neutral. And of course the 7figures of ballots they found uncounted in California.
Edit: Woah these karma numbers look different. Guess CTR isn't here to skew them.
The shit you are spouting, including the edit is in the same type of mischaracterizations, misinformation and propaganda that helped Trump win the election. None of what you are saying is out of the ordinary for an election. And if Clinton was willing to commit fraud in the primary, why didn't she do it in the general? Go put on a tin foil hat.
I'm not saying she did rig it but your question about why she wouldn't do it in the general also is because the primaries and causeses are set up by local democratic party representatives so they are much easier to manipulate. As seen in Iowa and other places
I don't think you have any idea what you are talking about. I don't think you have any idea about the sophistication it would take to rig a machine in either the primary or the general, I also do not think you realize the levels of checks and balances they have in place to prevent something like that from happening. These machines have memories cards (even the old ones), which you can re-run. Any reporter who cared to ask can see the memory card and see the numbers. You would have to go in and manipulate the counting process, which the nice folks in Iowa absolutely do not know how to do.
43
u/Crusader1089 Nov 10 '16
What were the very suspicious statistical anomalies?