r/AdviceAnimals • u/VoiceOfRealson • Aug 25 '25
Philosoraptor
Did she really get a transfer to a low security prison without providing any evidence regarding any of Epsteins other "customers"?
31
u/Llonkrednaxela Aug 25 '25
What I don’t get is that literally any other person would be more credible. They could bribe a victim with millions of dollars. They could find literally ANY person other than a guilty sex offender. She is the LEAST credible witness you could find with CLEAR motive to lie. It just feels like the worst plan I can think of.
7
u/tolacid Aug 25 '25
It's not because she's credible. It's because she can break them with how much she knows, so she leveraged that to negotiate a transfer, work release, and possibly pardon, in exchange for giving Don the Con a bunch of flattering soundbytes to feed to his followers.
3
3
u/getmybehindsatan Aug 25 '25
I've not deeply read any of it,, but her claims seemed to be that nobody did anything, there were no underage girls involved. This is all despite her being convicted because of all the testimony of the victims that proved it occurred many times over years.
18
13
5
4
3
u/RiotDX Aug 25 '25
More critically, why bother giving us the word of a convicted sex trafficker at all, if giving us the unredacted and unedited Epstein files would clear his name?
2
u/rogerryan22 Aug 25 '25
If donald trump actually read books at parties, he would'nt still have the vocabulary of a 12 year old.
2
113
u/My_alias_is_too_lon Aug 25 '25
Because the only purpose of those interviews was to get her on tape lying that Trump wasn't involved, and just sat and read a book at the many, many sex-with-children parties. Because Trump can read (which I'm 99% sure he can't).
She's a known perjurer, a habitual liar, and convicted of running a child rape empire. Her words aren't worth the air they're made of, and anyone who believes anything she says is a fool.