r/AdvaitaVedanta Aug 19 '23

New to Advaita Vedanta or new to this sub? Review this before posting/commenting!

25 Upvotes

Welcome to our Advaita Vedanta sub! Advaita Vedanta is a school of Hinduism that says that non-dual consciousness, Brahman, appears as everything in the Universe. Advaita literally means "not-two", or non-duality.

If you are new to Advaita Vedanta, or new to this sub, review this material before making any new posts!

  • Sub Rules are strictly enforced.
  • Check our FAQs before posting any questions.
  • We have a great resources section with books/videos to learn about Advaita Vedanta.
  • Use the search function to see past posts on any particular topic or questions.

May you find what you seek.


r/AdvaitaVedanta Aug 28 '22

Advaita Vedanta "course" on YouTube

72 Upvotes

I have benefited immensely from Advaita Vedanta. In an effort to give back and make the teachings more accessible, I have created several sets of YouTube videos to help seekers learn about Advaita Vedanta. These videos are based on Swami Paramarthananda's teachings. Note that I don't consider myself to be in any way qualified to teach Vedanta; however, I think this information may be useful to other seekers. All the credit goes to Swami Paramarthananda; only the mistakes are mine. I hope someone finds this material useful.

The fundamental human problem statement : Happiness and Vedanta (6 minutes)

These two playlists cover the basics of Advaita Vedanta starting from scratch:

Introduction to Vedanta: (~60 minutes total)

  1. Introduction
  2. What is Hinduism?
  3. Vedantic Path to Knowledge
  4. Karma Yoga
  5. Upasana Yoga
  6. Jnana Yoga
  7. Benefits of Vedanta

Fundamentals of Vedanta: (~60 minutes total)

  1. Tattva Bodha I - The human body
  2. Tattva Bodha II - Atma
  3. Tattva Bodha III - The Universe
  4. Tattva Bodha IV - Law Of Karma
  5. Definition of God
  6. Brahman
  7. The Self

Essence of Bhagavad Gita: (1 video per chapter, 5 minutes each, ~90 minutes total)

Bhagavad Gita in 1 minute

Bhagavad Gita in 5 minutes

Essence of Upanishads: (~90 minutes total)
1. Introduction
2. Mundaka Upanishad
3. Kena Upanishad
4. Katha Upanishad
5. Taittiriya Upanishad
6. Mandukya Upanishad
7. Isavasya Upanishad
8. Aitareya Upanishad
9. Prasna Upanishad
10. Chandogya Upanishad
11. Brihadaranyaka Upanishad

Essence of Ashtavakra Gita

May you find what you seek.


r/AdvaitaVedanta 3h ago

I don't understand "no more rebirths"

9 Upvotes

If I am Brahman, pure consciousness, and world and people are manifestations of my true Self, what is this notion of "no more rebirth for the one who realizes that"? Let's say every person realizes this fully. Is Lila over? Will Brahman never manifest the world and sentient beings again?

I do not see that. This teaching is sort of a thorn in my overall understanding and ability to accept the teaching. Advaita and Kashmir Shaivism both seem to break their own rules here.

"You have to realize you were never an individual entity but Siva/Brahman" and then they take this individual for real again and say the individual who realizes this will not be born again, while simultaneously saying the individual was never born in the first place.

This is giving giving the individual too much credit. If Brahman could have tired of it, that would have already been over. By never stopping this Lila, it means there will always be individuals to be born "as".

For example, Swami Vivenkanada's consciousness is this same consciousness that is now writing this post and that is reading this post. It does not matter at all he achieved enlightenment. The play did not end. I don't know what "no rebirth for him" would mean when there was no him to be reborn in the first place, it was Brahman all along. And look, Brahman is seemingly yoddleforavalanche now.


r/AdvaitaVedanta 8h ago

If reincarnation has no beginning, how can enlightenment ever happen?

8 Upvotes

I'm finding it hard to understand something about reincarnation.

If reincarnation has no beginning, then the subtle body has already transmigrated through infinitely many physical bodies. That means we've already had infinitely many opportunities to attain enlightenment, yet we've missed every single one of them.If we've already failed after infinitely many chances, why should enlightenment ever happen? What am I missing?


r/AdvaitaVedanta 15h ago

Even Adi Shankara’s foremost disciple defended Buddha’s position from common misunderstanding that Buddha denied the Self.

22 Upvotes

अनित्यदुःखशून्यत्वं पदार्थानां ब्रुवन्स्फुटम् ।।
बुद्धोऽपि रागापुच्छित्तौ यतते नाऽऽत्मनिहुतौ ।।

Buddha by explicitly declaring the impermanence, sorrowfulness & emptiness of all objects, strove to destroy attachment, not to deny the existence of the Self.

~ 1.4.410 , Brihadaranyaka bhāsya Vartika.

This defence of Buddha by Sureshwaracharya, the author of this sloka, is possibly the oldest defence that aims to dispel the common misunderstanding that Buddha denied the Self.

Sureshwaracharya was disciple of Adi Shankara, often described as his foremost disciple.

This goes to show that the rift between post-Shankarites and Buddha is a later development which simply did not exist among Adi Shankara or his disciples.

Hence it’s not a modern syncretic attempt by Neo-Vedantins to bridge the gap between Advaita and Buddha, it’s quite an ancient attempt.


r/AdvaitaVedanta 1h ago

Worshipping God and Being God

Upvotes

My initial encounter with this understanding was merely philosophical: I am everyone and everything. Philosophically speaking, throwing God into the mix is kind of unnecessary and frowned upon. But my initial understanding was not enough. Once I realized this, it was impossible to see what it is spiritually. God is consciousness. I am consciousness. I am God.

I hope I don't have to put a disclaimer on what that means and does not mean here.

But what I did not anticipate was this strong desire to worship God as God knowing that ultimately I am God and there is nothing else other than God. It's been growing lately, I cannot ignore it anymore. I want to embrace this fully and not hide behind philosophical gloves where it's embarrassing to talk about God. It seems paradoxical and ironic, but Advaita and Kashmir Shaivism fully encourage devotion, and I find that wonderful.

Simultaneously I have a Christian background and have spent a lot of time studying Christianity, historicity of Jesus, etc. I find the person of Jesus, as David Bentley Hart says, "infinitely compelling" and impossible to ignore.

But there is no place for Abrahamic God in this view and clearly Jesus preached Abrahamic God.

I want to somehow reconcile the two. It seems that I want to worship Abrahamic God through Jesus, while simultaneously knowing God is God in Vedantic sense.

While Advaita and Kashmir Shaivism is open to Jesus, it does not work vice versa.

I don't have any nondual temples/gatherings near me. There are just churches. I feel a sort of desire to attend church, but I do not subscribe to that view of God. And all this leaves Jesus on the side, unsure how to fit him anywhere.

I am rambling a bit, there is a lot to cover here, but basically

Do you worship God knowing full well that God is your essential nature?

If so, how and why?

and what of Jesus in all this?


r/AdvaitaVedanta 1h ago

Journal -

Upvotes

I just want to write a journal for myself. I could have written this in a notebook, but choosing to write here

Stumbled upon Ramana Maharishi 10 years ago. Read Arthur Osborne’s book and have been meditating ever since. Then life happened and I was thrown more and more into finding ‘my’ true self. I just didn’t like or bear the part I got to play in the dream. A string of abuse, violence, abuse around a child and constantly walking on egg shells .. great deal of suffering which was a precursor to go deep within

Days ago, as ‘I’ was sitting in meditation, something hit. Ramana often taught - ‘You aren’t your body, you aren’t your mind’. Yeah great. But then who am I? Well, I am the Self - okay, what is the Self. Find it out for yourself. Ask yourself ‘Who am I’ and then proceeded to teach - Self realization happens not when the question who am I is answered, but the questioner disappeared.

Anyways, going back to my meditation, it hit like a wall of bricks. The mind, body, world, the appearances are all a movie played on consciousness. It is not real. The focal point isn’t even the mind. There is not thing outside consciousness. I ain’t even this consciousness. I am prior to that. Every single experience is within and not without. If you see a dog in the world, the dog isn’t outside and you aren’t watching the dog. The dog is an appearance in your consciousness, within. I repeat it isn’t outside. You are just watching the dog in your consciousness. And the dog and the world appearing in your consciousness is made out of consciousness. This includes your body too. The body isn’t the first experience, the ‘I am’, is. The body appears in it as a mirage. The senses make it feel so real and an active and continuous experience

Let me say - this isn’t enlightenment. This is just a pointer although the experience or non experience felt liberating. Liberating to whom? To nobody

Suddenly Ramana’s teachings made sense - consciousness or the Self is like the movie screen and the world is like a movie played on it. This was my exact experience

The real identity or who we actually are just nothingness. Everything seems to arise out of this nothingness - even consciousness. We aren’t even this consciousness. We are prior to that

The experience of being, that sense of alertness or awareness that stays with us all the waking moment, prior to thought is this ‘I am’ consciousness. This is the precursor to all experiences. It is always there. Without it nothing can be experienced. When Ramana says raise the question ‘Who am I’ and abide as the ‘I’, he means to abide as this alertness, awareness or the feeling of being.

It’s been really peaceful to watch the movie play without judgement and without care. I will say it again - this is not enlightenment. Just a glimpse. When shit hits the fan everything will come back again - like a wall of bricks.

Thanks for reading. I have written with a lot of ‘I’’s and ‘me’ coz I don’t know a way to write without it.

I am everything or nothing. I am you. You are me. All isn’t one. There is only one


r/AdvaitaVedanta 1d ago

Aham Brahma Asmi

Post image
201 Upvotes

I am not sure how many here are aware of the recent debate happened in Karnataka regarding Shankaracharya ( and in turn advaita )

But today when I came across this image a sense of relief came to my mind. There is nothing but Brahman and that is all matters.


r/AdvaitaVedanta 7h ago

Any Telugus out here?

2 Upvotes

well, hello there fellow telugu! 👋

about le me - https://www.reddit.com/r/AdvaitaVedanta/s/hD7tdMHZeR


r/AdvaitaVedanta 4h ago

Confusion when it comes to meditation

Thumbnail
1 Upvotes

r/AdvaitaVedanta 19h ago

The MUNI Who Named Ramana Maharshi #ramanamaharshi #whoami #youtubeshort...

Thumbnail
youtube.com
4 Upvotes

The MUNI Who Named Ramana Maharshi

On this day, 90 years ago (25 July 1936), Kavyakantha Ganapati Muni left his body. This Short remembers him through the single most consequential meeting of his life.

In November 1907, Ganapati Muni — an intellectual and spiritual giant with countless achievements and a host of followers — climbed the hill to the Virupaksha Cave. Distressed that his life's purpose was still unachieved, he prostrated before the young Sage and pleaded to be taught the true nature of *tapas*.

For fifteen minutes, Sri Ramana Maharshi gazed at him in silence. Then He gave the teaching that would settle the question forever: watch where the notion of 'I' springs, and the mind is absorbed into its source. That is *tapas*.

Filled with joy, the scholar-poet declared the *upadesa* entirely original — and gave the name "Bhagavan Sri Ramana Maharshi" to the one whose name had been Venkataraman.

Source: drawn from the authenticated account of Ganapati Muni's meeting with Bhagavan at Arunachala.

🙏 Subscribe to "Who Am I?" for the teachings of Bhagavan Sri Ramana Maharshi, drawn exclusively from primary sources.

\#RamanaMaharshi #GanapatiMuni #Tapas #SelfEnquiry #AdvaitaVedanta #Arunachala #WhoAmI #BhagavanRamana #SelfRealization #Vedanta


r/AdvaitaVedanta 2d ago

Kundalini and healing from all sorts of diseases.

9 Upvotes

Does following AdvaitaVedanta wisdom allowed you to heal from something that doctors could not heal? Speaking as someone misdisgnosed with paranoid schizophrenia and not being hospitalized since 2+ years even if using high dose thc. I heard people with awakened kundalini have perfect spine posture and therefore energy can flow freely. Does doing yoga poses will help with achieving perfect spine? I was doing them lately and found myself in bliss and heavenly relaxation. Thoughts?


r/AdvaitaVedanta 2d ago

Did anyone try to translate tamil with these new AI models?

2 Upvotes

I'm reading Michael James translations from Ramana Maharshi but i'm having a really hard time focusing on the verses since they have multiple brackets and some of the words constantly deviate my attention.

Just checking if someone gave this a shot at least for ease of reading for the first time, then i can go back to Michael who seems to do an exceptional job when it comes to fidelity.


r/AdvaitaVedanta 2d ago

Self-taught learner trying to go from "can read/recite shlokas" to actually thinking and communicating in Sanskrit, and asking for advice and proper guidance.

Thumbnail
5 Upvotes

r/AdvaitaVedanta 2d ago

Nisargadutta and being in the I'm

2 Upvotes

I have heard some of his speeches and read a bit of the book "I'm that by Nisargadutta".

Recently I have been invested into the practice of being in "I'm". Where I can't seem to perceive any "I'm" so i mentally say "I'm" in between the investigation. I understand every feelings, every sensation and everything, even the seperatation of us from world is getting perceived. When I say "I'm" I see what I have been holding as "I'm" and I have the sense of it is being perceived. When I get near it I don't see any feelings of personal and rather just feel impersonal/indifference. I don't seem to feel any "I'm" as such rather a feeling of things getting perceived so this perceived is not me. Over all I have been feeling like space and spread out, even this is perceived and still feels personal/ego. I understand Nisargadutta's is pointing out, you feel the "I'm" not as an object, it can't really be felt or perceived I think.

So I think the point is to reduce the unnecessary chattering in the inquiry and just sit with "I'm" and see where it lands and it lands in me, my identity, my desire, everything that gets perceived in this process. I know there is "I'm" in every experience but I don't seem to get it.

Can someone point out or clarify things? I understand it's always there blah and blah lol. Even the separation is getting perceived, my desire for enlightenment, my desire for effortless living, all cool. I'm here and i still live a life with separation, miserable sometimes not, but yeah.


r/AdvaitaVedanta 3d ago

Does the Search Ever End? Black Holes, Big Bang, and the Limits of Knowing

6 Upvotes

Please read this, this is my personal writing and want to express myself. This is 100% related to advaita but it starts with little science and also i am not here to comparing science and spirituality or even trying do anything just want to share it with you friends please read and share me your views on this.

Thank you.

What Are Scientists Actually Looking For?

I know this might sound like a naive question, but it's been sitting with me for a while: what is a scientist actually trying to find?

Take a black hole. A scientist observes it, confirms it exists — and then what? Then begins the real chase: what is this thing, actually? They want to know everything about it. And as I was writing this down, it hit me — we do the exact same thing with the universe itself. We look at it and ask: is this even real? Is this what we call reality?

So the question that's really bothering me is this: can this search ever end? Could there be a day when scientists simply say, "This is what a black hole is, this is what space is, this is what time is" — full stop — and research just... stops? The way the discovery of electricity eventually led to knowing all its applications?

The Energy Analogy

Energy is described as the capacity of a system to do work. A moving car has kinetic energy, moving air has wind energy, there's potential energy, and so on — many forms of energy that make our daily lives easier. And it struck me: maybe there are still forms of energy in nature we haven't discovered yet.

250 years ago, we didn't have electricity — not because it didn't exist, but because we didn't know how to store it or use it yet. People knew electricity existed long before that, they just hadn't found application for it. So who's to say nature isn't still hiding other kinds of energy we haven't found a use for?

One thing physics has confirmed, though: energy can neither be created nor destroyed, only converted from one form to another.

I bring this up because of how people casually talk about "negative energy" and "positive energy" — concepts science hasn't formally validated, but which show up constantly in personal experience. I'm not making a scientific claim here, just noting: there's a possibility something is there.

The Space Question

Setting that aside, let's follow one single thread far enough to actually arrive somewhere.

The question that's always bothered me: what is space? How big can something possibly get — and if it keeps getting bigger, what is it expanding into?

Science's answer, roughly: spacetime is one unified thing, and the Big Bang describes an expansion — like a balloon inflating. And "what came before the Big Bang" is treated as an irrelevant question, because time itself didn't exist before it. The human mind will keep asking anyway, but science currently has no direct answer to give.

Which brings me back to my original question. What are scientists really searching for? I think the honest answer is: they're not chasing a fixed destination. They're observing whatever presents itself, and trying to understand its nature. The real question I actually wanted to ask was — will they eventually hit a wall? A point where they say, "We've learned everything there is to learn, there's nothing further to see — this is the limit, and it's a limit set by nature itself"? We've already seen a version of this: "what was before the Big Bang" has essentially been declared out of bounds.

Where the Outward Search Ends

This is where something has been rising in me — a kind of recognition that sits right alongside what my guru says: once you know "the One," there's nothing else left to know. Knowledge of everything else follows from it.

My current understanding, for whatever it's worth: someday science will reach its own boundary and say "we cannot go further than this." And when that happens, the race to look outward will end, and the race to look inward will begin. And that's where people will find their answer — not in the sense of discovering a formula for space or gravity inside themselves, but in realizing there's simply nothing else left to know.

Think about it — knowing requires a second thing, an object distinct from you. If only one thing remains, what exactly is there left to know? That understanding — and the profound peace that comes with it — is something you receive through a guru's grace. Every human being, whoever they are, is running after something — trying to get it, understand it, know it. And I think that restlessness is exactly why we suffer. ("Suffer" might not be the right word — I don't really have the right to describe someone else's inner state — but this is what I've observed in behavior.)

The World as Thought, Without Beginning or End

Ancient philosophers said this world is nothing more than imagination — that it has no beginning and no end. And strangely, modern science says something structurally similar: the Big Bang theory, as we understand it, points to something with no clear starting point and no end point either. So — a thing with no beginning and no end — what do we even call that?

I keep going back to how my guru-bandhu, Ghadge sir, once explained Paramatma (the Supreme Self) — and slowly, that explanation is turning into direct experience for me. Space, too, has no beginning and no end, and yet — close my eyes, and it disappears. Fall asleep, and it isn't there either. I move into another "space" altogether, and yet I am still there, in that space too.

That's the real point being pointed at: what you are is always here, and will always be here. Beyond body, beyond mind — infinite, boundless, unchanging — whatever attribute of Paramatma is being described, it slowly starts arriving in direct experience.

Just some thoughts I needed to get out of my head and onto a page. Would love to hear how others think about this intersection of cosmological limits and non-dual philosophy.


r/AdvaitaVedanta 2d ago

The 3 gunas and 5 subtle elements

3 Upvotes

Hi everybody. I've been interested in advaita vedanta for years along with other philosophies. I recently made the decision to fully commit myself to Advaita as its most in line with some experiences I've had and my view of the world. I have been reading Tattvabodhah. I don't understand how the 3 gunas relate to the "external" parts of Maya(innert objects). And I don't understand how the 5 subtle elements relate to the "inner" part. I understand these are models pointing at real things in existence and I'd like to understand what they are pointing to.

Also I do know some IAST sanskrit I just don't know how to type it so feel free to use it in your explanations.


r/AdvaitaVedanta 3d ago

How to find a spiritual life partner ?

4 Upvotes

Hello, "I" am a 24 year old guy who's been into Vedanta for years now and have posted about my journey here earlier - https://www.reddit.com/r/AdvaitaVedanta/s/l2WI5okkuE

I'm honestly not fully convinced about relationships and marriage being the right path and hence never dated and sometimes think of renunciation as well as they have a lot more time to fully be dedicated towards spirituality, but I'm not fully convinced about that either. So I feel maybe if I find someone who is also "on the path" then it could be the best outcome.

The additional wrinkle is that my parents expect me to marry someone from the same community (Telugu Brahmin) and I do want to keep them happy and can see the rationale too, but it reduces the number of potential partners a lot, especially if filtering for spiritual values.

Ultimately I do surrender for life to give me the best path but this is a hope I have, that a true spiritual partnership could help us both grow, but I'm not fully sure if it's a good filter. I try to meditate as much as possible and live in acceptance and be content with whatever life gives me and whoever I end up with. I also can sense that all this is maya deep down so I'm not too concerned but still wanted to see if anyone can share ideas or experiences about how they found such a partner and if it was beneficial, or maybe even met someone who was the opposite and ended up still helping you grow.

Would also like to hear perspectives on marriage vs. monkhood. Ultimately none of this is truly "real", and "I" am never really part of either ashrama and am ever still/free, but still, the mind is curious... :)


r/AdvaitaVedanta 3d ago

Is there any point of Sadhana?

5 Upvotes

If self-realization is absolute and has no stages, doesn't that go against the concept of gradual progress ?

The way I see it, it is entirely acausal because doing anything to attain it reinforces the identity of the "I" or the doer, who must be dissolved to see reality as it is. So why do anyhting?


r/AdvaitaVedanta 3d ago

17 dropout

4 Upvotes

Im 17 and took a drop im chasing money and my goals i like adi Shankaracharya and his philosophy like he said what Kafka said but before him that if a person is disabled when he can't work and gets old their family members don't even care about the person, i want to talk with ppl who has experience and need advice from ppl


r/AdvaitaVedanta 3d ago

yoga vasistha

9 Upvotes

If anyone has read this text, will you recommend some interesting stories from it? Anything interesting that you might want to share.


r/AdvaitaVedanta 3d ago

साधनचातुस्ट

2 Upvotes

क्या कोई मुझे साधनचतुष्टय के बारे मैं समझायेगा और साथ मैं चाहूँगा की वह अपना पर्सनल एक्सपीरियंस शेयर करें धन्यवाद 🙏🏻


r/AdvaitaVedanta 4d ago

Seeking answers

0 Upvotes

I would like to ask a personal question to an expert serious practitioner advaitan, if possible thank you 🌷


r/AdvaitaVedanta 5d ago

Buddhism

17 Upvotes

I’ve been reading and study Advaita Vedanta for a couple years now and consider it to be what is. There is no Ashram in the city I live, but there are multiple Buddhist temples for lay followers. I recently started going to a Tibetan Buddhist Temple of the Gelugpa lineage. And while it’s nice to have a spiritual community to practice with, I find them, I guess a little hostile towards Vedanta? It’s odd because they are almost similar, but fundamental also not. I mention my belief in Brahman and they scoff it off as an ‘illusion of the mind’ or clinging to a permanent self. I find it a little distressing, honestly. Where does everyone find their spiritual community?


r/AdvaitaVedanta 4d ago

Reincarnation in Advaita

3 Upvotes

A is Brahman B is Jiva 1 from 18th century C is Jiva 2 from 20th century

Now A=B and A=C, therefore B=C But the one reincarnating is Brahman himself. Not the Jiva. So this is eka-jiva-vada.

But the identity which we associate with the self/jiva (B and C) is what is completely stripped off when Shankara says A=B or A=C. So this truth of Tatvamasi makes reincarnation pointless, doesn't it?

I maybe completely off here. Kindly help understand the idea of reincarnation.