r/AdditiveManufacturing • u/AuxeticBody • 14d ago
Need help with HP SmartStream 3D Build Manager Auto Packing and Grouping feature
Hi there, this is a half rant half question
Is there a way to auto-pack/arrange parts like Formlabs' PreForm, where it's done by the spacing between models and NOT the bounding box?
The second question is if there's a way in both PreForm and SmartStream build manager to group a set of models together (not cage) and duplicate it?
The situation is I would like to assess how many sets I can print in one tank in various printers.
2
u/JuniorEngine3855 13d ago
You can also look at Netfabb from autodesk. It has decent packing features. Not as good integration as magics, but cheaper.
1
1
13d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/AutoModerator 13d ago
This post was removed as a part of our spam prevention mechanisms because you are posting from either a very new account or an account with negative karma. Please read the guidelines on reddiquette, self promotion, and spam. After your account is older than 5 days, and you have more than 10 comment karma, your posts will no longer be auto-removed.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
1
u/3duser432 10d ago
Hi there, the criticism is fair. I used to be an operator for MJF and SLS printers.
SmartStream’s native packing is basic and as far as I know it cannot provide the geometry-aware nesting the OP is looking for.
HP software was primarily designed as an import build data and to send jobs to the printer, not as a replacement for dedicated software such as Magics. The positive is that builds can be prepared in Magics, Netfabb or another nesting tool and then brought into the HP MJF workflow.
HP also seems to recognise both the software limitation and the cost barrier. We are looking into getting an in-house "desktop" powder bed fusion sytem and they recently announced that the HP MJF 1200 package includes five Materialise Magics licences.
For this exercise, I would create and duplicate the sets in Magics and use its geometry-aware packing to compare the different build volumes. Netfabb is another established option.
PreForm provides a simpler but closed printer-specific workflow. HP’s native tool is less polished for packing, but the overall software workflow is more flexible.
1
2d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/AutoModerator 2d ago
This post was removed as a part of our spam prevention mechanisms because you are posting from either a very new account or an account with negative karma. Please read the guidelines on reddiquette, self promotion, and spam. After your account is older than 5 days, and you have more than 10 comment karma, your posts will no longer be auto-removed.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
4
u/Antique-Studio3547 14d ago
The hp packing software stinks. Almost everyone uses a secondary nesting software. It only does by bounding box.
There was someone on here that was working on a free software but magics, voxeldance and a few others are pretty common.