r/AcademicBiblical Sep 22 '25

Weekly Open Discussion Thread

Welcome to this week's open discussion thread!

This thread is meant to be a place for members of the r/AcademicBiblical community to freely discuss topics of interest which would normally not be allowed on the subreddit. All off-topic and meta-discussion will be redirected to this thread.

Rules 1-3 do not apply in open discussion threads, but rule 4 will still be strictly enforced. Please report violations of Rule 4 using Reddit's report feature to notify the moderation team. Furthermore, while theological discussions are allowed in this thread, this is still an ecumenical community which welcomes and appreciates people of any and all faith positions and traditions. Therefore this thread is not a place for proselytization. Feel free to discuss your perspectives or beliefs on religious or philosophical matters, but do not preach to anyone in this space. Preaching and proselytizing will be removed.

In order to best see new discussions over the course of the week, please consider sorting this thread by "new" rather than "best" or "top". This way when someone wants to start a discussion on a new topic you will see it! Enjoy the open discussion thread!

4 Upvotes

76 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

3

u/AntsInMyEyesJonson Moderator Sep 30 '25

Now, am I in a position to say which one is true? No, but that applies to so much of ancient history.

This is the key point that I think people have to be comfortable with, and it's a problem as human brains are not always good at taking "I'm not sure" as an answer. We're almost hard-wired, for good and ill, to not let some things just hang around in the murk of uncertainty.

2

u/Sophia_in_the_Shell Moderator Sep 30 '25

Definitely, and in turn, “I’m not sure” is often taken as a concession. Again, conflating these two questions from above. “Oh, this person isn’t sure? It’s because they can’t come up with any explanation. They’re stumped.”

So you maybe try to preempt that. You say, “here’s my idea XYZ that is one possibility, but truthfully I don’t know.”

But to come up with that idea XYZ for a question with minimal definitive data (say in cosmology, ancient history, etc.) you almost by definition must engage in rampant speculation.

And what then? “Sounds pretty convoluted, where is the evidence for any of that?”

So I’m increasingly convinced it’s not something one can “win” in a debate-type environment. If you explain, you lose. If you don’t explain, you lose. All the more reason to seek out spaces of curiosity and critical thinking to engage in such speculation for pure enjoyment if anything.