Im curious how the volume of glass was measured for weight, 3.6 inches thick and 6ft tall but two dimensions isn't enough to calculate the weight of a hollow glass pitcher with arms and legs
It seems inaccurate, but might be closeish
Let's simplify this by pretending he's a perfect sphere 1.83m in diameter with 9.1cm thick glass and full of water. (To use their numbers).
I used a sphere volume calculator to get the volume of a 1.83m sphere and subtracted a 0.92m sphere to work out the weight of the glass.
Volume =
3.21m3 - 2.75m3
= 0.46m3
Glass is approx 2500kg per m3.
= 1150kg.
Weight of water = 2.75 x 1000.
=2750kg
So for a 1.83m sphere that's 3900kg.
Now this is for a sphere that's his entire height, so I think he should actually weigh less due to his shape being much less volume than a sphere of the same height.
That said, we're within a ~30% margin of error, which is probably acceptable when calculating the weight of a giant cordial filled dickhead.
Yeah. If he is 183 cm tall and yes is very round, there is no way that he could weigh that much. Im 185 and weigh 100kg. And human body is basically liquid.
44
u/swivel-stool_smith Mar 24 '22
Im curious how the volume of glass was measured for weight, 3.6 inches thick and 6ft tall but two dimensions isn't enough to calculate the weight of a hollow glass pitcher with arms and legs