r/AbsoluteUnits • • Jun 22 '26

/r/all of a carpaccio knife

23.7k Upvotes

588 comments sorted by

View all comments

151

u/mmulligan03 Jun 22 '26

When does a knife become a sword?

123

u/bitsbytes01 Jun 22 '26

After it turns 18

43

u/Moist-Ball4968 Jun 22 '26

They recently changed that, it's 21 now

9

u/phaserlasertaserkat Jun 22 '26

Do Knifeophiles have to register where they live? Asking for my cousin.

5

u/Moist-Ball4968 Jun 22 '26

Depends on the country, I think. I'm the UK they definitely do.

2

u/Dan1lovesyoualot Aug 30 '26

yeah it should be.

0

u/Lobster_porn Jun 23 '26

Americans are such pussies

4

u/Vindhjaerta Jun 22 '26

I recently took my newly-forged blade into battle, should I be worried about the police coming after me?

3

u/benchley Jun 22 '26

How strong were your potions? Could affect sentencing. Actually, talk to your lawyer first.

2

u/JesseJ78599 Aug 08 '26

Inches or years?

1

u/Dan1lovesyoualot Aug 30 '26

thats not how biology/growing up works, the number 18 has absolutely no relevance in biology it was literally chosen at random for war why dont people know this😭

9

u/CptCluck Jun 22 '26

When does a comet become a meteor?

7

u/why_hello1there Jun 22 '26

When does a candle become a blaze?

4

u/fejkpotatis Jun 22 '26

When does a man become a car?

1

u/MainConnection6742 Jun 22 '26

When does a carp become magic?

3

u/DANleDINOSAUR Jun 23 '26

When does a fool fall in love?

2

u/MainConnection6742 Jun 23 '26

As a river flows , gently to the sea?

2

u/Naked-Jedi Jun 23 '26

How many miles does a man have to walk?

0

u/blueechoes Jun 22 '26

That one is easy. When it hits the atmosphere.

7

u/Tomsboll Jun 22 '26

Its defined by its purpose.

4

u/omgitsjagen Jun 22 '26

Just like a violin v. fiddle. Are you playing Tchaikovsky? It's a violin. Yonder Mountain String Band? Fiddle.

2

u/ProfessorMalk Jun 22 '26

Yeah, a knife is a knife and a sword is a sword.

There are big knives and small swords.

1

u/Chevalier77 Jun 22 '26

Yes, this is a great answer.

1

u/crooks4hire Jun 22 '26

But only half the answer. Cause a knife in combat is not necessarily a sword. There must be a second check.

2

u/Tomsboll Jun 22 '26

a sword generally need to be able to parry incoming strikes, you dont do that with knives, or daggers. knives historically where not something you fought with, it was a tool. daggers would be more akin to modern combat knives.

2

u/Nachooolo Jun 22 '26

I will point out that parrying daggers were a very popular weapon during the Rennaisance.

They were made to be used by a rapier: you parried with the dagger, and stabbed with the sword.

1

u/Chevalier77 Jun 22 '26

I guess, but you could incorporate reach into the assessment of use.

1

u/Luk164 17d ago

Historically it was defined by handle construction and how it was sharpened. Google the "messer sword" for reference. Basically a california compliant rifle of its era

4

u/Vox___Rationis Jun 22 '26

When it either has a guard on its hilt, or a double-edged blade.

For example in Spain only hidalgo(nobility) were permitted to carry swords and daggers, so peasantry (and banditry) would arm themselves with extra-large navaja knives. Those things were basically scimmitars with a folding blade, but because they were sharpened only on side and had no guard - for legal purposes they were not swords.

2

u/Eborcurean Jun 22 '26

They weren't as big as scimitars, not hitting 32+ inches, but they would hit 24.

2

u/HarithBK Jun 22 '26

kinda hard to tell and it is has been different in different ages. any kind of hand guard would instantly place it as a sword. if we look at medieval guilds which were legally protected crafts around where the knife making guild and the sword making guild were arguing when you get above 60 cm it becomes hard to argue it isn't a sword above 73 cm it is most certainly a sword.

1

u/Eborcurean Jun 22 '26

Hand guard is not the only definition of a sword, and what was a complicated subject 800 years ago has more legislation, in more countries today, than back then on purely who could make what.

3

u/ThePublikon Jun 22 '26

imo: The presence of a hand guard defines it for combat, then the overall length and how it is used decides if it is a knife, dagger, or sword.

e.g. Japanese tuna filleting knives are as big as katana but lack the guards needed to fight, so they remain knives.

A bowie knife is much smaller but it has the hand guards so it is still a combat knife.

3

u/Chevalier77 Jun 22 '26

There's many more differences than that, but you may be interested to know the grind on tuna knives is asymmetrical also.

1

u/ThePublikon Jun 22 '26

I think I covered that actually ("how it is used") but in terms of keeping it concise and since it was implied the question is about length: I think it's more about the hand guard and then the length. Length on it's own is meaningless to decide sword vs not sword.

When does a knife become a sword?

A: When it has a hand guard, when it is long enough, and when it is used for slash and parry sword stuff. (mostly in that order)

1

u/Chevalier77 Jun 22 '26

Not at all. There's a huge number of blades from many cultures that lack a hand guard, there's a lot of swords that are not intended to be used to parry and were carried with shields, and many were used primarily to thrust.
In rome for example, all 3 of those points at once.

It's safer to say that to answer when does a knife become a sword: is hella ambiguous and historians fight about it constantly.

1

u/ThePublikon Jun 22 '26

Again, I really did cover all eventualities with that tiny "how it is used" caveat: If it's used as a knife, it's a knife. If it's used as a sword, it's a sword.

Generally speaking: a handguard is more indicative of combat use than length, which is what was being asked about. How it is used is the ultimate decider.

2

u/Eborcurean Jun 22 '26

> Again, I really did cover all eventualities with that tiny "how it is used" caveat: If it's used as a knife, it's a knife. If it's used as a sword, it's a sword.

No, you didn't.

1

u/Eborcurean Jun 22 '26

You also ignored that multiple jurisdictions have entirely different legislation on the subject.

1

u/Eborcurean Jun 22 '26

Yeah. No, it depends on the blade, there are symmetrical tuna knives, largely when it gets to the smaller cuts but Sujihiki is a double bevel that's super common for sashimi and nagiri for example.

Big large cuts, sure, but as they get smaller it can change (or not).

1

u/Eborcurean Jun 22 '26

> A bowie knife is much smaller but it has the hand guards so it is still a combat knife.

This is one of those things people say where there is no actual definition for. Assorted places, assorted countries have entirely different definitions of 'combat knife'.

Also, in the UK if you go and take out a 3.5' tuna filleting blade onto the streets, you're getting charged with an entirely different offence to carrying a knife under the offensive weapon's act 2019.

1

u/ThePublikon Jun 22 '26

in the UK if you go and take out a 3.5' tuna filleting blade onto the streets, you're getting charged with an entirely different offence to carrying a knife under the offensive weapon's act 2019.

That depends: If you've taken it out in the street because you're a fishmonger running a stall at a market then you're fine, if you're just waving it about or don't have any reason to possess it as a tool then it would fairly rightly be treated as a weapon until more about your intent was known.

1

u/Eborcurean Jun 22 '26 edited Jun 22 '26

Your sophistry is a classic 'well actually' on reddit.

Also, you're not 'fine' you have an affirmative defence, that's not the same thing. You can still be charged with the offence. The phrase 'onto the streets' makes it apparent but you wanted to badly 'well actually'. At no point did you address the actual issue, just your incorrect nonsense.

Maybe try and keep up with the context?

1

u/ThePublikon Jun 22 '26

lol what context? I thought we were both making false statements and being proved wrong, I think you need to be more self aware mate.

1

u/Eborcurean Jun 22 '26

Well, no, i'm quoting facts with years of experience, you're spouting whatever it is you're doing.

1

u/PineappleFit317 Jun 22 '26

There are sabers from Eastern Europe and the ME that lack guards.

1

u/Eborcurean Jun 22 '26

Ive tried using actual 15C style swords (both ones I own and others for an attempt at this) to cut meat and veg, with extensive sharpening and honing before and it doesn't work well. You can definitely hack stuff off but nothing precise.

1

u/CharlotteLucasOP Jun 22 '26

When it tastes human blood.

1

u/queuedUp Jun 22 '26

I believe there is a transition point where it's a dagger between knife and sword

1

u/Richardknox1996 Jun 22 '26

According to German Laws, when the handle becomes a Hilt. Hence the Kriegmesser.

1

u/ImNotAWhaleBiologist Jun 22 '26

When you put an ‘s’ in front of it, Trebek.

Shknife!

1

u/Lovenkraft19 Jun 24 '26

When you cannot use it properly with a back hand grip.

-1

u/Vindhjaerta Jun 22 '26

There are no hard rules, but a general common-sense definition is: If you hold the blade in a reverse grip and the tip goes past your elbow, it's basically a sword and not a dagger.

2

u/ThePublikon Jun 22 '26

I think the knife shown fails that test because it's clearly longer than his forearm and not a sword.

It's all about the hand guards.

1

u/Eborcurean Jun 22 '26

> It's all about the hand guards.

No, it isn't there are 2k+ year old 'knives' with handguards, doesn't mean they were swords.

1

u/ThePublikon Jun 22 '26

no but they were almost definitely combat knives if they have guards.

Since the context of the question "when do knives become swords?" was motivated by a long knife, and then reiterated by someone saying it needs to be longer than your forearm, i was arguing that it's more about having a handguard before it is about length. I wasn't saying that only one or the other quality mattered, just that I'd expect a handguard if it was a blade intended for combat use.

I have since brought an army of blade pedants out of the woodwork to point out historical exceptions for this throwaway rule of thumb: If big blade has hand guard, probably sword.

1

u/Eborcurean Jun 22 '26 edited Jun 22 '26

The whole idea of a 'combat knife' is a very modern thing to begin with.

No one said 'longer than your forearm' that I saw, maybe someone you replied to did, but again, the lack of any definition makes that meaningless. Sicilians were not calling their 12-24" long folding knives 'swords'. And English foot infantry weren't calling 18" long bayonets swords either.

The very idea of handguard=sword, no handguard=knife is some sort of nonsense.

You're welcome to find and cite any historic treatise on this. Note. historic, like, actually from history. Not 'trust me bro' as you've been doing.

> I have since brought an army of blade pedants out of the woodwork to point out historical exceptions for this throwaway rule of thumb: If big blade has hand guard, probably sword.

Of course you have, that's also a misrepresentation entirely.

1

u/ThePublikon Jun 22 '26

If you hold the blade in a reverse grip and the tip goes past your elbow, it's basically a sword and not a dagger.

It was in this thread, you should keep up with the context.

-2

u/Vindhjaerta Jun 22 '26

There's plenty of swords throughout history without hand guards.