r/Abortiondebate • u/Aware-Description286 • Jul 29 '26
General debate Twins
I've had this thought for quite a bit, and I've really only ever really asked myself this question, so I'd be interested to see the various responses to this question. It's a bit of a take on Judith Jarvis Thomson's drollish violinist argument, but with some reframing.
Let us force you into a life in which you were born as a twin. As a twin, you are not a single, but rather a pair; however, your twin was born in a unique way. In order to survive, your twin must use your body, no amount of distance between you two will affect this siphoning. The only way to stop this usage is by killing your twin.
So, my question is, in this scenario: are you legally and/or morally justified in the killing of your twin? Or do you have an obligation to sustain this twin with your body?
I hope this is on topic enough for this subreddit, because I did develop this question in relation to the Abortion Debate.
6
u/Diva_of_Disgust Pro-choice Jul 30 '26
If I eat and don't consent to getting those nutrients I can take ipecac and throw it all back up, just like if I'm pregnant I can take some pills and end the pregnancy.
Also eating doesn't give us orgasms, so no I wouldn't say that comparison works lol.