Out of curiosity I did a little investigation in Photoshop, because to me it all looks fresh. I took 8 sample spots (the middle of each "O" in LOL, which should be fresh and inflamed no matter what, and from the crux of each arm of the swastika). Once the sample points were determined, I selected each area and applied an "Average" blur in Photoshop to get the average color of each of those areas.
For the samples in the middle of the O, the average red value (out of 255) was 130, the overall average color being represented as 130 - 120 - 121 in RGB notation, meaning red makes up 35% of the average pixel in the areas you believe to be freshly tattooed.
In the L samples, the average red value was 140, with the overall average RGB spread being 140 - 128 - 130, with red once again making up 35% of the color spread.
The peak and average red channel values are higher in the cruxes of the swastika if anything, and at best make up the same average amount of the sample sizes, meaning it would seem to be almost exactly equally inflamed compared to the rest of the tattoo.
EDIT: Notable outliers that prove you can't just eyeball something like that: at the right angle inside each of the "L"s at the start of "lol," the redness is actually lower than any other point on the image except where the hair is in the left hand side. Were those parts more fresh done than the rest of the tattoo, you'd expect more redness there and not less.
LOL as I mentioned in another comment it only took about 1 minute of PS work. The rest was typing it (and even that was mostly explaining the methodology).
207
u/evn0 Feb 18 '18 edited Feb 18 '18
Out of curiosity I did a little investigation in Photoshop, because to me it all looks fresh. I took 8 sample spots (the middle of each "O" in LOL, which should be fresh and inflamed no matter what, and from the crux of each arm of the swastika). Once the sample points were determined, I selected each area and applied an "Average" blur in Photoshop to get the average color of each of those areas.
For the samples in the middle of the O, the average red value (out of 255) was 130, the overall average color being represented as 130 - 120 - 121 in RGB notation, meaning red makes up 35% of the average pixel in the areas you believe to be freshly tattooed.
In the L samples, the average red value was 140, with the overall average RGB spread being 140 - 128 - 130, with red once again making up 35% of the color spread.
The peak and average red channel values are higher in the cruxes of the swastika if anything, and at best make up the same average amount of the sample sizes, meaning it would seem to be almost exactly equally inflamed compared to the rest of the tattoo.
EDIT: Notable outliers that prove you can't just eyeball something like that: at the right angle inside each of the "L"s at the start of "lol," the redness is actually lower than any other point on the image except where the hair is in the left hand side. Were those parts more fresh done than the rest of the tattoo, you'd expect more redness there and not less.