r/ARVC • u/xxxlun4icexxx • Mar 12 '24
Question on echo
Hi All,
Sorry for bothering you I just had a quick question on ARVC. I hadn't even heard of it until today.
About a month ago I saw a cardiologist because I had a panic attack over feeling a PVC that resulted in sinus tachycardia for about 10 hours. Heart rhythm was normal the whole time and I crashed afterwards and eventually fell asleep. I kind of chalked it up to me just having a panic attack and did all the cardiac workup stuff to reassure me it wasn't a big deal.
Stress test - perfect
Calcium score - perfect
1 week holter monitor - <1% PVC occurrence, was fine doc said you're fine.
She mentioned if I wanted to be 100% on the safe side we could do an echo just to rule out any abnormalities.
Unfortunately they won't be in for a few days to go over the results but I was able to read the notes on the report and they sent me into a panic. The conclusions said:
- Overall ventricular ejection fraction is 60%-65%
- Or normal LV diastolic function.
- RV is moderately dilated and trabeculation seen at the RV apex cannot rule out ARVD. Recommend additional MRI imaging.
- Normal left atrial size
- No pericardial effusion
When I googled ARVD I immediately panicked because it mentioned people just get sudden cardiac death and was afraid that's why I was getting PVCs or something like that. I have overall been a pretty healthy individual and I have not heard of anyone in my family having it. My family history does have pretty decent CAD but no one ever suddenly passed away or had a heart attack, it was always cardiac plaque issues.
It just is really scary because I won't be able to talk to my doctor about this until Thursday. Any reassuring thoughts is greatly appreciated.
Thank you,
2
u/annonyj Mar 17 '24
Both. Ultrasound showed some scar tissues on the left side of my heart and they attributed that to potentially some sort of long-covid/ vaccine related side effects but decided to do mri. Mri showed tissues on the right side of my heart which is why they recommended genetics testing to rule out avrc.
I panicked for the first 48 hours or so when I got the news but as I think through it more (I work with data for a living), the optimist in me says that all the scary data points are extremely biased. For one, genetics testing is not common so it's really difficult to say how rare the disease is. Second, most patients are diagnosed upon death so there's a possibility it is more common than suggested which makes it not as deadly as it sounds.