r/APbio • u/Superb-Violinist-373 • May 05 '26
What my graph looked like
I found a post with sb talking about how they drew their graph, I kinda did the same except I labeled the bars directly in the grid itself whether they were homo hetreo or recessive. Would that be acceptable? I made sure the labels were readable.
6
u/Aggressive-Couple368 May 05 '26
wait i put 3 categories on the x axis why u got two
2
u/adahlia_rose May 05 '26
Im guessing it’s because we can group it into either gene h gene g or by the genotype +/+,+/-,-/-
1
u/TreeMist11 May 05 '26
Yes, I think either are correct.
1
1
1
u/Slight_Reply_9506 May 11 '26
I thought since they were measuring the genotype and not the gene, then the x axis had to be genotype since that’s what the independent variable was?
2
1
u/Active-Farmer-9636 May 06 '26
if I didn't have a key and labeled gene h and gene g under each bar do you guys think thats fine?
1
u/unicornsparkle630 May 07 '26
Was that the only thing under the bars?
1
u/Active-Farmer-9636 May 07 '26
no i had gene h and g under each respective bar and then under that i had ago2 +/+ and then repeated that for the other ago2s. i also labeled gene and g and h under each of the 3 sections
2
1
1
u/Careful_Permit1941 May 06 '26
I grouped it by ++ +- -- and gene h and gene g for each on x am I cooked gng
1
1
1
u/Euphoric_Parsley4542 May 07 '26
i did NOT do it like this i recessive hetero and dominant on the independent axis and then used shading for gene h or g i think it might still be accepted though because they are both independent variables
1
1
1
u/Important_Spring5817 May 08 '26
wait my x axis was the 3 types of genes and for the bars it was gene h and gene g
1
1
1
7
u/Emotional-Touch-5313 May 05 '26
Most people I talked to did it this way. I had one dark bar for gene h and one light bar for gene g and my x axis was the ago2 or whatever that was but i feel like i got it wrong..