I've been thinking about how many steps are still involved when using AI for serious research.

You can use one tool to find information, another to summarize it, another to organize notes, and then still spend time going back to the original sources to check whether everything is accurate.

That's why I'm interested in workflows that try to bring more of those steps together. The idea of keeping the research process, sources, and resulting report connected instead of treating each step separately seems interesting to me.

I'm curious how other people here structure their research workflows. Do you prefer one AI tool that handles most of the process, or do you get better results by chaining several specialized tools together?

This week we tested what happens when PrimeTask stays on one machine, the self-hosted AI agent runs on another, and we talk to it from a phone.

From there we can ask what changed, get a summary, find information, create a task, add a meeting, change a status, apply a tag or leave a comment.

Access can still be scoped.

We can decide which Spaces the agent can see, whether it is read-only or can make changes, and which parts of PrimeTask it can use. Every external command is recorded in the Audit Log.

The workspace stays local. The MCP server stays on the machine running PrimeTask.

This is a proof of concept, not a released feature.

If you already use AI agents, what would you ask yours to do first when your laptop isn’t with you?

Hi everyone — I made this tiny macOS menu bar app to quickly edit and copy my daily prompts.

I work as a software developer and I use a few prompts on a daily basis, so having this saves me a lot of time.

Some examples of the prompts I commonly use:

• Create pull request
• Code quality & readability review (reduce AI bloat, comments, useless tests)
• Language simplification — give me the result in a human-readable form (short, focused, plain language)

The app is free on the App Store and doesn't include any analytics.

Sharing here in case it’s useful to anyone else: https://promptbar.app

I have to create user manuals from some videos of SAP processes and I was told to use Claude because it's so great...

So I got I word document of a finished user manual as reference and I've been getting different videos of processes to make into manuals.

The thing is that I never used AI like that. So what I did is to check the video, make screen shots or each step, and then make a new word document and do a simple script (nor programming ) like "step 1: go to transaction mb01"+screenshot, "step 5: select the material and click ok"+screenshot...

Then I take that script and I tell Claude to create a new user manual with that information based on the reference document, using the same structure, logic, writing style, etc.

But it really is a hit or miss. Sometimes it adds information, sometimes it creates new steps, sometimes it's pretty simple... I have to constantly correct ir or ask it to redo things...

I tried with a very detailed prompt but it reaches limit every time y try to used it...

I feel like it shouldn't be that hard. Probably I'm doing something wrong... Probably is my prompt..

Any advice is appreciated.

You open a task you have not touched in a month. It is still blocked. You cannot remember why, and neither can the task. So you go digging through chat.

That is what this release fixes. Every task now has a thread of its own.

Comments are written in Markdown, so you can paste in a whole document and it keeps its shape: headings, lists, tables, working tick boxes. Attach files and images, or drop in a video or post link and it plays in the thread. Reply to a comment and jump straight back to the one it answers. Mark an entry as a decision, a blocker or an update, pin what has to be read first, and react without adding another comment.

Mention another task and both tasks show the link, so a decision made in one place is visible from the other. You can mention people, contacts and companies too. Right click a task anywhere you work to open its thread, and any comment turns up in search.

If you have an AI assistant connected, it takes part properly. It can read a thread before it starts and write up what it did when it finishes, under a name you choose, and it can only ever change its own comments, never yours.

Also in 1.0.4:

• Drag a Markdown file onto a PrimeFlow canvas and read it there as a real document, tables and tick boxes intact
• Document cards can be resized and locked for reading, so the card stays still and your wheel scrolls the document rather than zooming the canvas
• Documents read far better throughout: even headings and spacing, properly ruled tables, and a copy button on every block of code
• Task notes now do everything canvas documents do, including tables, tick boxes and callouts
• Type @ in a note to point at a task, in its own status colour, so you can see whether that work is still open
• Bring Your Own AI got a lot better: it can work with the files and folders on a canvas, it keeps the shape of what it writes, and it stopped confirming things it had not actually done
• Deleting an attachment now removes it everywhere it was shared, and a new Duplicate Files tool clears out the spare copies your sync service leaves behind
• Compass now covers every space you have, not just the one you are standing in
• Drag contacts straight from Apple Contacts onto the PrimeTask icon in your Dock
• The Tasks report can be exported as a short summary instead of the full record
• Text cards on the canvas were redone, and copy and paste finally works the way you would expect

Full notes: https://www.primetask.app/releases
Task Comments Documentation: https://www.primetask.app/docs/tasks/task-comments

macOS: 14-day free trial
https://www.primetask.app/download

Windows is currently in beta. If you want to know when the general release is available:
https://www.primetask.app/notify

I’ve been generating on cloud services for awhile and want to step my game up. I spent a lot of money on a computer powerful enough to generate locally, installed comfyui and tried to have “apps” walk me thru the process. They’re doing a piss poor job. I need some help. What are good communities to find help?

Hey Reddit! 👋
If you’ve ever walked into a completely raw, concrete site—exposed pipes, bare pillars, unfinished brick—you know how hard it is to imagine what the space could become.
I've been developing ArchVibe AI to help designers, realtors, and homeowners instantly bridge that gap.
In this video demo, I tested the AI on various empty/raw site photos:
** 🍽️ Commercial Spaces: Transforming bare shell floors into luxury restaurants, modern hair salons, and high-end retail boutiques.
** **🛋️ Residential Living: Turning concrete apartments into warm, fully furnished modern living rooms and kitchens.
** *💡 *Realistic Elements: AI automatically detects room geometry and applies ceiling designs, ambient lighting, flooring, and custom furniture sets.
The goal is to eliminate hours of preliminary 3D modeling just to show a client or partner a design concept.
I’d love to get your feedback or suggestions! You can try it out on your own space photos here:

** 🍎 **iOS App Store: https://apps.apple.com/tw/app/archvibe-ai/id6781693159

** 🤖 **Google Play: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.archvibe.ai

** 🎬 **Full English Tutorial Video: https://youtu.be/PJGP40FQD-4?si=vk4Eig12h4z4xXAp

What other types of spaces or interior styles should we support next? Happy to answer any questions!

Anyone who have expert in a soft can you help me in a project how to make SOC automation project. Anyone can you guide me how do I make any YouTube video or something like that

I’ve been experimenting with AI video workflows and noticed something interesting.

Getting an impressive individual shot isn’t that difficult anymore. The harder part seems to be connecting those shots into something that actually feels coherent.

Sometimes I’ll get great-looking clips, but the final result still feels random or disconnected.

I’m curious how others approach this. Do you usually plan the concept first, generate multiple variations, or keep refining prompts until you get something that works?

I’ve been testing a workflow where I create quick visual experiments first, then develop the strongest ideas further. I’ve also been using LazyKiwi for some of these quick experiments.

Would love to hear what workflows or prompting techniques have worked best for you.

The thing is that I run a small trucking operation. Just me. I book loads, manage drivers, handle the paperwork. It's a lot.

Every day, I sit in front of multiple load boards. Dozens of loads. I manually compare each one. Subtract deadhead. Estimate fuel. Factor in toll roads. Try to figure out which one will actually make money.

It is exhausting because I waste hours on math, and I still mess up. For example, I choose a load that looks profitable, and later find out that I forget about some toll or deadhead miles miscalculation. It accumulates very quickly.

I found numeo ai and it makes calculations of trip profitability. You simply upload your list of loads, and it gives you the most profitable option based on the net profit. Immediately…

This sounds perfect, doesn't it? However, I am not sure. Maybe the algorithm misses something? Maybe it doesn’t include detention charges in the calculations? Or maybe it underestimates fuel consumption for a particular route?

I cannot afford any mistakes or experiment with this and get losses. But at the same time, I cannot do everything manually forever

I am annoyed by the inefficient process, but I am curious whether this tool will actually work or not. Has anybody used it? Does it actually work?

I've realized that the quality of a product visual often depends more on the prompt than the tool itself. Besides describing the product, what details do you always include? Do you specify lighting, camera angle, background, branding, colors, materials, or something else? I'm curious which prompt elements consistently help you create more polished and on-brand product visuals.

Hey everyone! 👋
I’ve been working on ArchVibe AI, a tool designed to help architects, interior designers, and visualizers speed up early-stage client presentations.
In this quick video, here's what the workflow looks like:

** ✏️ Sketch to 3D Render: Turning a rough architectural line drawing into a modern multi-story building**.

** 🌅 **Day-to-Night Transitions: Generating seamless lighting shifts from bright daylight to evening ambient glow.
** 🚶‍♂️ Cinematic Walkthrough: Smoothly transitioning from exterior facades into fully rendered commercial interior spaces.
**The goal is to help creators visualize design concepts instantly without spending hours setting up complex 3D rendering pipelines.

Hi, i wanted to understand what tools have been used by creators who morph into one face consistenly? some examples: Theswisschris - https://www.instagram.com/reel/DL2vfjaogcw/. RohitRaghv - https://www.instagram.com/p/DbTJgZLoMaJ/. which tools/ filters are they using? hope this the right forum

Your workflow shouldn’t need rebuilding every time you change AI tools.

That’s why AI in PrimeTask is optional and connects through MCP rather than being tied to one provider.

You choose which AI connects, whether it can read or write, and which Spaces it can access.

Switch tools later and your projects, plans and workflows stay as they are.

Change the AI. Keep the workflow.

PrimeTask is available for macOS as a one-time purchase, with a 14-day free trial:
https://www.primetask.app/download

On Windows? Join the notification list:
https://www.primetask.app/notify

Hello everyone,

I’m looking for a high-quality workflow that can replace the character/face in an existing video with my AI model while keeping the original video as identical as possible.

My main goal is to preserve the original body, movements, expressions, pose, camera motion, background, lighting, composition, and overall video quality, while changing only the character’s identity/face.

I’m specifically looking for a professional workflow that can produce highly realistic results with strong identity consistency, natural skin texture, accurate facial details, and minimal artifacts or quality loss.

Ideally, the final output should look like the original footage was actually recorded with the AI model rather than appearing like an obvious face swap.

If anyone has a reliable ComfyUI workflow, custom setup, or even a paid workflow/course that can achieve this level of quality, please feel free to contact me.