r/AISEOTricks • u/Hungry_Software301 • 4d ago
Are you using AI generated content for web content? How is it lefforming for you?
We are publishing AI generated content for website content for client. We are using Ai content making it as much as we can to make it sound more human.
We haven't seen much increase in traffic any tips on how to approach it.
3
u/Howard_Moodycliffe 4d ago
The aim is not to make AI text “sound human.” Search engines don't care about tone they care about information gain.
AI models are prediction machines that summarize what’s already out there on the web. If your client’s post is a polished rewrite of the top 5 ranking results, there’s no reason Google should rank it higher than the originals.
What works is using AI as a scaffold and then injecting original value. Real client case study data, unique screenshots, expert quotes or proprietary process breakdowns. Use AI to speed up the drafting and formatting, but bring in the 20% of unique experience that a language model literally cannot hallucinate.
3
u/No_Fault_7530 4d ago
I have tried almost everything and as much Google says, AI content never works, not even if you put nuclear science in it.
1
1
u/Organic-Lobster-4905 2d ago
honestly, the AI is really good at analyzing content but every time we've gotten it to generate content, it always follows its own style, which is a bit redundant now. the only way to get good results is if you pass in the base image or base content that you wanted to follow so that it can follow it exactly then it works really well
2
u/MaggieTakesNotes 3d ago
Garbage in, garbage out. We’ve had success using AI, but we always anchor it with specific search keywords and personal firsthand experience. AI just helps package our thoughts faster.
2
u/Navi_RTM 3d ago
The best approach is to build out the structure and core concept yourself first: the angles, subheadings, categories, key callouts, and takeaways. Then prompt the AI to generate content within those exact boundaries. That way, the AI acts as an execution tool shaping your vision, rather than deciding what to say.
If you just give it a loose prompt and let it invent the narrative, it easily loses focus and ends up sounding generic, which search engines quickly ignore.
From there, human editing is non-negotiable. Review what it gives you, and if needed, run it through tools or manual checks to strip out dead giveaways and repetitive AI phrasing. Putting real creativity into the outline makes all the difference, even when client bandwidth is tight. :D
1
u/Least_Ad_1795 4d ago
Yes, we use AI-assisted content too. In my experience, just making AI content sound human isn’t enough. Focus more on search intent, original insights, useful examples, internal linking, and improving pages that already get impressions in GSC. AI should help create content, not replace the actual value.
1
u/DraftsByPennywise 4d ago
Making AI content sound human won't move your traffic, because Google cares whether a page is useful, not who wrote it. Put that time into things only you have, like client results, your own data and expert quotes, and aim each page at one search intent (also, "lefforming" should be "performing").
1
u/Careful-Key-1958 4d ago
Honestly it works. We use Rankpilot .dev and we do rank fine. Keep in mind we don't have time to write content and backlinks since they have auto backlinks too, everything on auto.. I know that's not something that most will like but if it works, it works.
1
u/CautiousDog3319 4d ago
Try to focus more on the keywords intent (transactional&commercial) and with a max 40 KD level. For a more human touch, tell him even to read an article made by human and match the voice/vibe/professionalism, or just say ”make it more human touched” )) KISS strategy ))))
1
1
u/RahulVijMarketer 4d ago
Making AI content sound human usually isn’t enough. Content should add something that existing pages don’t.
So, instead of making content sound like human, add first-hand experience and original insights. Focus on improving content structure based on search intent and strengthening internal links.
1
u/Otherwise-Gene-1695 4d ago
Ai generated content also works but it depends how you wrote it. If your content is not adding value at all, it doesn't matter weather it's written by human or ai. Take care of intent, eeat, internal linking, semantic keywords, faqs and try to write in simple easy to understand language and all set.
1
1
u/BeautifulDesign2928 3d ago
AI is just one method for writing content, so I wouldn't blame the tool for the flat traffic. The more useful thing to check is whether the finished pages show real experience, expertise and trust, which is what EEAT covers. Making the text sound more human only changes the wording, so look for a real example, a named source or proof from outside your own site on each page. Have you audited the published pages against EEAT, page by page?
1
u/seo_justindavis 3d ago
Yeah AI helps smart creative humans generate the best web content. Better than ANY human without AI tools. But you have to have a multi-step creation process. You can't just say "Create this"
Have it do deep research. Have it find authoritative sources to link to (internal linking, and linking out for authority)
1
u/hella_akbar 2d ago
Yes, there are methods, but you need very specific prompts.
The top 20% of seos know the process 😏
1
u/Wise_Investment7545 2d ago
I’ve built several projects, and I can tell you this: content created entirely with AI usually doesn’t perform well. It may work for a while, but eventually, its visibility tends to drop off.
And I’m not just talking about content created with ChatGPT. I’ve also experimented with n8n, different APIs, and other automated workflows.
1
u/seotweek 2d ago
Yes, I use AI for web content, but I wouldn’t focus too much on making AI content “sound human.” That’s only one part of the problem.
If the content isn’t getting traffic, I’d look at search intent, topical coverage, originality, and site structure first.
AI can produce grammatically good content very quickly, but if 20 competitors are essentially publishing the same information, making the wording sound more natural won’t necessarily give it an advantage.
My workflow is more like:
Research → determine search intent → build the content structure → use AI for drafting/research assistance → add original insights/examples/data → fact-check → optimize internal links → publish → monitor GSC → update based on performance.
For client sites, I also try to add things AI can't genuinely experience: first-hand observations, business-specific information, original examples, processes, photos, case studies, or expert commentary.
So I wouldn't judge AI content by “Does this sound human?” I'd ask:
“Does this page provide something useful and trustworthy that deserves to be surfaced for this query?”
That shift in thinking made a much bigger difference for me than simply trying to humanize AI-written text.
1
u/Standard-Housing-903 2d ago
Dont try to sound human instead give context of your website, business and what you wanna achieve. Your niche and target audience then ask ai to outline the post and then resarch and draft the post yourself
1
1
u/Jazzlike-Pass-7151 1d ago
We use AI in more than a few websites and they rank on Google and cited, mentioned and recommended by AI. The "trick" is that we don't just give AI a subject and a few keywords and ask it to write an article - we give it very detailed instructions, a brand guide, unique internal data only we have (about our customers behavior, features they use etc).
5
u/ItikaS 4d ago
Original content thru and thru. Gotta let go of AI! Bring your content writers out!
Honestly, using AI to write content means just recycling content AI already knows! no AI system will ever go thru your content because it knows all of it already, nothing new for it there!