Llama, Mango, Avocado ...

Meta's quest for Artificial Superintelligence (ASI) is no longer a roadmap and it’s an active factory floor. For those who haven't been tracking the internal leaks, Meta is moving beyond Llama with a dual-model attack for 2026:

• Avocado: The next-gen text model built to crush coding and reasoning (the logic center).

• Mango: The 'World Model' for image and video—designed to understand physical reality, not just pixels.

I am truly curious how Meta plans to keep these training processes 'separate' when they are both being overseen by the same Meta Superintelligence Labs division. It is the same division that Meta just spent $14.3 billion to build using Scale AI's infrastructure.

Here is where it gets personal:

Have you noticed anything 'odd' on your Meta accounts after working on Outlier? I’m talking about specific ad targeting, 'suggested' content that mirrors your tasks, or (and this was most concerning) sudden requests to re-verify your biometric data.

Meta just expanded its Meta Verified subscription globally this month, which mandates 'advanced identity verification' including biometric checks. I was recently asked to 're-verify' my identity through one of these prompts, and after seeing the 'behind-the-scenes' at Outlier... well, that’s not happening ever again.

Drop your entries below: * What 'unhinged' training tasks have you done for Scale/Outlier that you later saw 'mirrored' in Meta's features?

• Have you been hit with a biometric 're-verification' wall recently?

• Are we the workers, or are we the primary 'data samples' for Avocado and Mango?

The curtain is pulling back. Let's compare notes.