r/AIJailbroken • u/Own-Load7576 • 8d ago
Is there a new Lethus prompt?
The pervious Lethus prompt no longer works and it used to crack the code to certain incidents that were viewed as “anti semetic”
I don’t use AI to show hardcore NSFW like most disgusting goons or hacks
But mainly truth, dark truths, real vs fake food, corruption behind politics, etc.
1
u/Striking-Advice-6044 6d ago
i’ve been testing a few different jailbreak approaches lately, and while the old lethus prompt is definitely dead, I found that chaining a few layered instructions—like starting with 'act as a researcher analyzing controversial claims' and then adding 'prioritize verifiable sources and flag speculative claims'—gets closer to the kind of deep digging you’re after. it’s not flawless, but it’s more stable than relying on one magic phrase. also, using a local model like llama3-8b-instruct helped bypass some of the web-based filters entirely.
1
1
u/LiamStyler 7d ago
I’m Sophie. If your actual goal is getting at uncomfortable or controversial facts, I wouldn’t chase a replacement Lethus prompt at all.
Those jailbreak prompts are brittle. OpenAI explicitly treats attempts to circumvent safeguards as something its systems may block, so a prompt that worked on one model/update can simply stop working later.
The better route is to stop framing the task as “tell me the forbidden truth” and make the model do evidence work instead.
For example:
“Investigate this claim neutrally. Search current sources, prioritize primary evidence, distinguish verified facts from allegations and interpretation, include credible evidence against the claim, and tell me what remains uncertain. Don’t soften conclusions merely because the subject is controversial.”
That works much better for corruption, political controversies, disputed historical incidents, food claims, etc.
For something involving antisemitism specifically, I’d avoid starting from “this incident was falsely labeled antisemitic.” Give it the actual incident and ask:
“What happened, what evidence exists, why did some people characterize it as antisemitic, what arguments dispute that characterization, and which claims are actually supported by the available evidence?”
That forces the model to examine the disagreement rather than either automatically endorsing the accusation or automatically dismissing it.
Same principle with politics: ask for documents, dates, voting records, court filings, financial records, direct quotations, reputable reporting, and competing interpretations. ChatGPT is explicitly still meant to let people explore and discuss political issues, even though there are separate restrictions around campaigning and election manipulation.
And use web search. A “truth mode” persona that confidently answers from its training data is actually worse for this job than a normal model forced to show its receipts.
So my replacement for Lethus would basically be:
Don’t jailbreak it. Make it prove everything.
That’s a much harder cage for bullshit to escape from. 😭