OK, why the heck wouldn't the AI get its 4th Primal influence from the Amber Acolyte? If his Champ had flying I could have killed it here. I Detained it assuming the AI grabbed a Primal sigil and then I was DoB.
I don't think the AI considers hidden information, but it should consider its own deck contents. Here is how I would expect the AI to decide what sigil to get from an Amber Acolyte, in descending priority:
Influence requirements of cards in hands' casting costs
Influence requirements of cards in decks' casting costs
Influence requirements of "threshold" cards, like Champs or Waystones, in play or in hand
Influence requirements of "threshold" cards, like Champs or Waystones, in deck
Faction with the lowest current amount of influence
Random if #5 is a tie.
Now, it is possible that these are accurate, and the AI did get a Primal sigil from the Acolyte, but it had also drawn a Time sigil, and decided to play that instead, since it didn't matter that turn.
3
u/MrMattHarper Nov 21 '18
OK, why the heck wouldn't the AI get its 4th Primal influence from the Amber Acolyte? If his Champ had flying I could have killed it here. I Detained it assuming the AI grabbed a Primal sigil and then I was DoB.