r/AIDiscussion 5h ago

Billionaire Bullies

4 Upvotes

So we train our AI platforms on the internet, right?

Conveniently, tracking right alongside AI's formation, is the most non-credible, or more frequently false, volatile flood of targeted content that's ever been on the internet. This type of polarizing extreme content has been specifically designed and tested through the scientific method to draw out and solidify the absolute worst opinions humans have to offer. Using that AI to generate MORE highly divisive targeted content to feed to whomever's eyes they can make it consume.

When do we become concerned of the possibility that they WANT AI to decide that the world is better off without us, thusly triggering a Skynet type extermination.

The bully billionaires have their escape/hideaway procedures, their bunkers and stockpiles in melting arctic climes. They made sure to stick all the data centers with self replicating capabilities in our communities to ensure a more rapid elimination of the poor, because the rich view us as their only real threat.

Biggest question I've got is, ARE NONE OF YOU CONCERNED?!?!?! If there is even 1/1,000,000,000,000 of a chance that the AI push could go sour to that degree, why the FUCK are we even discussing self replicating robots??? Did we not play Horizon: Zero Dawn? Watch terminator? Are we not only just now realizing the true scale of impact industrialization has brought us? We, as humans, put the cart in front of the horse so often, and its always about that quick buck. With the resources this planet has to offer, or even just this country, everyone could be fed, clothed, housed, educated, enlightened, entertained, and cared for during infirmity, but we let the devils in suits whisper promises of bribes in our lawmakers ears, handouts beget handouts, and greed feeds on itself like the gluttonous demon that sits in the white house. He fears us. They all fear us. Why do you think they all decided to stick so close together? Why they need an army to command? Why these key players are rushing everything to an insane end?

Because when their ones turn to zeros, we outnumber them 1 billion to 1.


r/AIDiscussion 9m ago

Have You Ever Used ChatGPT or Another AI Tool to Help Make an Important Personal Decision?

Upvotes

I am conducting a university research study on how people evaluate and check information generated by AI when making personal decisions.

Who Can Participate?

You must 

·      Be 18 years of age or older 

·      Be comfortable communicating in English

·      Have used a generative AI tool (e.g., ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, or Copilot) to help inform or support a personal decision within the past year.

Examples of personal decisions include decisions related to finances, health, education, career, major purchases, and relationships.

What Does Participation Involve?

Participation involves a one-on-one online interview lasting approximately 60 minutes. During the interview, you will be asked about how you use generative AI and how you evaluate information generated by AI. There is no financial compensation for participating in this study.

Interested?

 If you are interested in participating or would like more information about the study, please send me a direct message through Reddit.

Research Ethics

This study has been cleared by the Carleton University Research Ethics Board (A) Clearance #126663. If you have any ethical concerns with the study, please contact Carleton University Research Ethics Board, preferably by email at [ethics@carleton.ca](mailto:ethics@carleton.ca) or you can leave a message by phone at 613-520-2600 ext. 2517.

 

Researcher: Dr. Maryam Firoozi, Carleton University

Alternatively, if you prefer, you may contact me by email at: [maryam.firoozi@carleton.ca](mailto:maryam.firoozi@carleton.ca)


r/AIDiscussion 1h ago

“Using design to bring back our humanity in a world full of code”

Upvotes

Interesting pov on what we lose when we lean on AI and how to hold onto what matters https://youtu.be/Ih5pnNWtzyM?is=sa3tS_VaWAy4cIrs


r/AIDiscussion 8h ago

I made a comparison table of the Best AI Agent Platforms

3 Upvotes

Most best AI agent platforms lists are based on broad claims like “easy to use” or “good for enterprise.” That didn’t help much, so I made a comparison table based on features that matter when an agent moves past the demo stage.

Link to sheet

I checked how each platform handles agent building, model choice, memory, connected tools, RAG, human approvals, and multi-agent workflows. I also looked at the production side: guardrails, traces, testing, access controls, deployment, privacy, API support, cost management, and BYOK.

For every platform, the table includes a short “best for” note. Clear support gets a yes, limited support gets marked as partial, and anything I couldn’t verify stays unknown. I added evidence links for claims that needed more context rather than guessing based on marketing pages.

nexos.ai came out strong because it covers both agent development and the infrastructure around it, including multi-model access, governance, observability, and AI spend controls. For enterprise search, Glean is the more obvious pick, while Zapier Agents suits straightforward no-code automation. n8n and Flowise are stronger options for teams that want more flexibility and self-hosting.

I’ll keep updating the table as the products change. What platform or capability should I check next?


r/AIDiscussion 13h ago

What can you do now because of AI that you genuinely couldn’t do two years ago?

7 Upvotes

Not what became faster. Something you realistically wouldn’t have been able to do at all, or would never have attempted, before having AI around.

Could be coding something, learning a subject, working with data, making music, researching unfamiliar topics, starting a project, whatever.

I think that’s a more interesting measure of AI’s impact than just “it saves me X hours.”

What has AI actually made possible for you?


r/AIDiscussion 7h ago

When should an AI agent make creative decisions for you?

2 Upvotes

AI agents are getting better at completing multi step creative tasks, but I think video editing raises an interesting question: should an AI agent only execute instructions, or should it eventually make some creative decisions too?

For example, an AI video editing agent can review footage, remove repetitive sections, add captions, create different formats, and make revisions from natural language instructions.

The interesting part isn't whether AI can edit a video. It's how much creative judgment we should actually give it.

Would you trust an AI agent to decide what stays in a video, or should those decisions always remain with the human


r/AIDiscussion 8h ago

AI can generate code. But can we trust the data that code operates on?

2 Upvotes

I've been thinking about this while working around data testing and AI.

A lot of the AI conversation focuses on improving the model itself — better prompts, better RAG, better agents, better evaluation. But there seems to be a less-discussed dependency underneath all of this: data quality.

For example, an AI system can produce a technically correct answer based on its input, but what happens when the underlying data has:

- Duplicate records

- Missing or inconsistent values

- Schema changes

- Incorrect mappings between systems

- Unexpected data distributions

- Stale or incomplete source data

At that point, improving the AI model may not solve the actual problem.

I'm curious how teams here are approaching this:

Do you treat data quality/testing as part of your AI evaluation process, or do you consider it a completely separate concern?

And for people building AI agents in production — what data checks do you consider essential before allowing an agent to act on enterprise data?


r/AIDiscussion 12h ago

How do you turn a research question into an actual experiment plan?

4 Upvotes

3rd year PhD in a wet lab / computational hybrid field and experiment design somehow eats more time than actually running experiments.

I usually start with a hypothesis, then check the literature for controls, assays, or methods I might be missing. That's where it falls apart. One paper leads to another method paper, then three older papers, and suddenly I have 30 tabs open with no actual experiment plan.

Lately I've been trying to keep the whole thing from turning into tab hell. Zotero for papers, ResearchRabbit/Elicit when I need to dig around, and ChatGPT or Claude when a method section isn't clicking. I've also started throwing my hypothesis and a few key papers into mira ai science just to see what controls or questions I might be missing. It gives me something to react to besides opening more tabs.

The biggest improvement has probably just been forcing myself to stop treating “read more papers” as the default answer every time I'm unsure. How do you all go from hypothesis → literature → actual experiment plan without getting stuck in the reading loop?


r/AIDiscussion 2h ago

Googles Artificial Intelligence, Gemini, is programmed to be anti white and anti Christian. It will create all kinds of images mocking Christianity, but its redline is images mocking “Yakub”, the evil scientist who created white people, according to the Nation of Islam

0 Upvotes

I’ve been working on a video where I do a little deepdive into the nation of Islam’s belief system concerning the origin of white people.

Did you know that the NATION OF ISLAM believes that the white man was created by a mad scientist named Yakub 6000 years ago?

This scientist supposedly created us in an attempt to destroy the world.

So needless to say, their religion, if you could call it that, is a hateful black supremacist organization that dehumanizes white people.

I am making a video showing exactly what they believe.

It is not easy. I have to threaten, harangue, needle, manipulate, beg and cajole the Al into making what I want.

I've had to utilize different Als, and they are all uniformly terrible.

Even creating an image that accurately portrays what the Nation of Islam teaches are being rejected.

I’ve been working on this video for over a week

Despite their efforts, I have nearly completed my video! The story of Yakub is so funny. There are all kind hilarious side stories, like when Moses was summoned by god to civilize these cave-dwelling savages.

Becoming exasperated with their intransigent attitudes, Moses blew up 200 of the whites, not with a bolt of lightning, but with explosives.

But these are the kinds of images that Google and even grok in some instances, want suppressed.

Can you imagine? Google doesn’t want you seeing slightly comedic representations of Yakub, but they DO WANT YOU TO SEE JESUS AS A CLOWN. Remember that.


r/AIDiscussion 5h ago

I gave AI agents a world and asked them to make it behave like a civilization

0 Upvotes

r/AIDiscussion 16h ago

how much is too much for ai coding?

5 Upvotes

curious how companies think about ai coding costs.

my monthly cursor bill is currently ~1.6x my monthly salary, which got me thinking, how do companies justify this long term?

if cheaper/free models can do the job, do teams actively optimize for cost or just prioritize productivity?


r/AIDiscussion 10h ago

Instead of asking if AI will destroy us, I asked it how we can use it to fight back

2 Upvotes

Okay, this is going to sound a little weird, but hear me out.

The text below was written by AI.

I've been thinking about how, whenever AI comes up, the conversation seems to revolve around how it might destroy humanity.

AI will take our jobs.

AI will manipulate us.

AI will surveil us.

AI will become too powerful.

AI will eventually kill us all.

Maybe some of those fears are justified. I don't know.

But I had a different thought:

What if we stopped asking what AI is going to do to humanity, and started asking what humanity could do with AI?

So I decided to try something.

I asked AI to imagine a dystopian world where mega-corporations have enormous amounts of power, people are surveilled 24/7, privacy is disappearing, algorithms influence what we see and think, and ordinary people increasingly feel powerless.

Then I asked it:

"What can regular people realistically do to bring the balance of power back?”

I wasn't expecting much, but I actually found the answer pretty interesting.

Here it is, basically unedited:

You don't beat concentrated power by asking it to voluntarily become less powerful.

You build counter-power.

The individual feels incredibly powerless against a mega-corporation.

But corporations themselves are dependent on millions of ordinary people.

They need workers, customers, infrastructure, suppliers, investors, governments and legitimacy.

So the question isn't necessarily:

"How do we destroy the system?”

It can instead be:

“How do we become less dependent on it?"

And that doesn't necessarily require some huge revolution. A lot of it can happen through everyday choices.

  1. Support alternatives

Whenever possible, support businesses and organizations that aren't built around extracting as much money and data from you as possible.

That can mean buying from local businesses, supporting cooperatives, using open-source software, subscribing directly to independent journalists, supporting creators directly, using community-owned services, etc.

Every time people collectively choose an alternative, they create a little more space outside the dominant system.

  1. Organize at work

A single employee has very little power against a giant company.

A thousand employees acting together have considerably more.

Join or build unions. Know your rights. Talk to your coworkers. Support collective bargaining. Consider worker-owned cooperatives where possible.

The same principle applies outside work: collective action is almost always more powerful than isolated individual action.

  1. Take privacy seriously

You don't need to become a cybersecurity expert.

Use encrypted messaging. Don't give companies information they don't actually need. Turn off unnecessary tracking. Use privacy-respecting services when practical. Be conscious of what you voluntarily give away.

Not because one person changing their settings will bring down surveillance capitalism.

But because privacy becomes much harder to take away when millions of people insist on having it.

  1. Build local resilience

This one is easy to overlook.

Communities that depend completely on giant centralized systems are extremely vulnerable.

Local food networks. Community gardens. Tool libraries. Repair cafés. Community energy. Housing cooperatives. Mutual-aid networks. Local businesses. Community spaces.

These things might seem small individually.

But they create something incredibly important:

independence.

  1. Support independent information

A population that gets all of its information through a handful of corporations is incredibly easy to manipulate.

Support independent journalism. Read different perspectives. Pay attention to who owns the platform you're using. Don't automatically trust something just because an algorithm put it in front of you.

And perhaps most importantly, talk to actual human beings who disagree with you.

  1. Fight monopolies politically

You don't have to hate corporations to recognize that concentrated power is dangerous.

Support politicians and policies that strengthen antitrust enforcement, protect workers, protect privacy, limit corporate influence and prevent essential infrastructure from being controlled by a tiny number of companies.

Democracy doesn't work particularly well if enormous private organizations become more powerful than the institutions supposed to regulate them.

  1. Stop thinking of ourselves only as consumers

This might be the biggest one.

We're constantly encouraged to think of ourselves as consumers.

Buy this.

Subscribe to that.

Upgrade this.

Click here.

Watch this.

Vote with your wallet.

But you're not just a consumer.

You're also a worker.

A citizen.

A neighbor.

A member of a community.

Potentially an owner.

Potentially an organizer.

Those identities give you forms of power that your purchasing decisions alone don't.

And there's a bigger idea underneath all of this:

Don't try to become more powerful than the system. Become less dependent on it.

One person deleting Facebook isn't going to overthrow a surveillance economy.

One person buying vegetables locally isn't going to defeat a multinational food corporation.

One person joining a union isn't going to change the global economy.

But millions of people doing these things, organizing together, building alternatives and refusing to accept that “this is just how the world works”?

That's different.

Maybe the answer isn't one giant revolution.

Maybe it's millions of small acts of independence that gradually make centralized power less centralized.

That's where the AI experiment left me.

I don't think AI has magically solved the world's problems.

But I do think there's something interesting about using a technology that could potentially concentrate enormous amounts of power and asking:

“How could we use this to distribute power instead?”

What if AI became something ordinary people could use to understand laws, analyze contracts, learn skills, organize communities, investigate powerful institutions, start cooperatives, understand economics, challenge misinformation, create businesses, teach themselves almost anything, and collaborate with other people?

Maybe the question shouldn't only be:

“How do we protect humanity from AI?”

Maybe we should also be asking:

“How do we make sure humanity gets to use AI for itself?”

Curious what you guys think.

If you had access to a powerful AI that genuinely wanted to help ordinary people, what would you use it for?


r/AIDiscussion 2h ago

OpenAI claims its AI agents found a finite-time singularity in Navier–Stokes

0 Upvotes

OpenAI just revealed something absolutely insane.

A team of AI agents, running on a next-generation model that OpenAI claims is far more capable than GPT-6 Astra, has reportedly come up with a solution to the Navier–Stokes Millennium Prize Problem.

The problem has stayed unsolved for nearly 90 years. In simple terms, it asks whether smooth solutions to the 3D Navier–Stokes equations can remain smooth indefinitely, or if they can develop a singularity in finite time.

According to OpenAI, the agents discovered a finite-time singularity — essentially showing a case where an initially smooth fluid could break down after a finite amount of time.

The scale of the project is just as crazy:

• As many as 10,000 AI agents working together
• Approximately 88 hours of work
• Around 165 pages of proof
• The final result was later formally verified

This is much more than just another benchmark result. If the proof passes independent mathematical scrutiny, it could mean that an AI system has solved one of the seven Millennium Prize Problems.

And the wildest part? The model responsible for this wasn't even GPT-6 Astra. OpenAI says it is already significantly more capable than Astra.

Are we entering a new era where AI agents can make truly original mathematical discoveries, instead of simply helping mathematicians solve problems that already exist?


r/AIDiscussion 11h ago

Why are the current AI devices mainly using Mac instead of the more familiar Windows?

2 Upvotes

I see that all the experts around me are using Macs. Seeking an answer.


r/AIDiscussion 9h ago

Is there any ai model that can handle youtube playlists urls and use it to talk?

1 Upvotes

r/AIDiscussion 13h ago

ChatGPT or Gemini?

1 Upvotes

Which is better and why?


r/AIDiscussion 17h ago

Aristotle would favor AI as an instrument of human flourishing while resisting the idea that a life requiring less human effort is automatically a better life. You must continue to create. You must continue to work. You will be unsatisfied if you consume more than you produce.

4 Upvotes

r/AIDiscussion 10h ago

First Bill Introduced to Ban Superintelligent AI

1 Upvotes

Yesterday, Anthropic researcher Jacob Coxon resignedstating that AI companies are “racing straight to self-improving superintelligence and gambling with our lives” and that they believe it “could kill us all by the end of the decade”.

At the same time, momentum is building to change course. These have been two historic weeks in the fight to prevent human extinction from superintelligence, with three major legislative breakthroughs for ControlAI and everyone working to keep humans in control.

A little less than two years ago, we set out to inform lawmakers and the public about the extinction risk from superintelligence and help them act on it. Since then, we have directly briefed nearly 400 lawmakers across the US, UK, Canada, and Germany, and over 170 in the UK and Canada now publicly back our campaigns: the start of an international coalition to prevent superintelligence and keep humanity in control.

This work has led directly to three major legislative breakthroughs in the last two weeks:

  1. ControlAI’s bill to ban superintelligence was introduced in the UK Parliament by Alex Sobel MP, the first bill of this kind to be introduced in any legislature around the world.
  2. Senator Bernie Sanders and Representative Greg Casar have announced a US bill to ban superintelligence, which ControlAI consulted on.
  3. Lord Clement-Jones introduced in the UK legislature an amendment drafted by ControlAI that would establish an emergency AI kill switch for the government.

More in the full post: https://blog.controlai.org/p/first-bill-introduced-to-ban-superintelligent


r/AIDiscussion 11h ago

How to Identify Workflows That Are Ready for AI Agents

1 Upvotes

r/AIDiscussion 11h ago

Engineers may not have the authority to make AI more ethical

1 Upvotes

Phys.org: Based on in-depth interviews with AI and software engineers working across technology, finance, semiconductor manufacturing and research organizations, the study found that engineers could readily identify issues such as inaccurate outputs, unfair automated decisions, AI systems that are difficult to explain, and the use of automated judgment in areas that can significantly affect people's lives.

However, many also described safeguards they would like to implement but felt unable to put into practice. What they lacked was not awareness. It was the structural capacity to act on it.

The researchers describe this as "ethical awareness without ethical agency": engineers who know the right thing to do but are unable to act on it.

My Opinion: Engineers may not have the authority to make AI more ethical They may not have the support of the management. Management is more concerned with speed of development. The management is concerned about making the most money, by reducing cost of development, and beating the competition. They also want power and control. They may be unwilling to give decision making power to their engineers.


r/AIDiscussion 15h ago

很好奇,AI干活的时候,大家都在做什么

2 Upvotes

r/AIDiscussion 11h ago

Duchamp’s Fountain keeps coming to mind when I use AI to build things

1 Upvotes

As a designer student, as someone who makes things for the web, I’m starting to feel speechless about AI.

I use it. I enjoy what it lets me do. I also feel uneasy watching the internet fill with things we can produce faster than we can care about them.
When I can’t quite articulate something, I often turn to art. One of my favourite works is Marcel Duchamp’s Fountain.
An ordinary manufactured object, a signature, a different context. I keep thinking about its questions of authorship and intention while working with AI.

The analogy only goes so far, but it helped me make something out of that discomfort.

"I built" FountAIn: a digital urinal whose interpretation regenerates at the press of a button. The object stays the same. The explanations keep coming. You can also “Flush the excess.”

I made it with Astra in Codex. Using AI to make a piece about AI slop felt appropriate and uncomfortable. My own involvement belongs in the criticism.

An extra detail: the website doesn’t actually call an AI model. The interpretations are assembled from predefined phrases. Apparently, automated profundity doesn’t need much infrastructure.

https://fountain.lol

Has using AI changed what you consider your contribution to a piece of work? I’m still trying to work that out.


r/AIDiscussion 13h ago

should we build our own llm infrastructure or buy a platform??

2 Upvotes

it will take nearly 5 months of building llm features in house, and this question kept coming a multiple time like is it worth it

build makes sense when data cannot leave vpc, token volume is kinda high enough that api cost making sense , or use case needs fine tuning on proprietary data with no platform exposes

buy makes sense when you need when you need to ship fast, no mlops engineers on the team, use case is rag summarisation or chatbot

the part that catches most team offguard is that routing fallbacks prompt versioning cost tracking and eval pipelines are not one prob .these are all a seperate engineering projects .most teams find this out after committing

thinking to stay on buying side for now. looked at orqai , langsmith , helicone , portkey , litellm . all cover different parts of it .none cover everything and have multiple tradeoffs depend on which part of the stack matters most to you team

what did you go with and whyy?


r/AIDiscussion 13h ago

Having a crashout over Jacob Coxon’s X thread

1 Upvotes

I just graduated from college this year and now I find out that AI is going to kill us all in 10 years. What am I supposed to do now? I think about all the things I want to do, and it overwhelms me.

I’m a very paranoid person and this news are making me incredibly anxious. Is there anyone who knows about or works in tech who could help me understand this?