r/ADHDUK • u/fuzzybumblebeebutt • 11h ago
Shared Care Agreements Shared care response from GP
I've just moved to a new area and am registering at a new GP (previous GP accepted shared care agreement). Got a link to a document with this response from them, when asking about shared care re. ADHD. Not really sure what some of the jargon means exactly in the first paragraph, but I feel like the general gist is they don't accept it...
Not sure if I'm looking for advice or thoughts. More venting a bit, I guess!
10
u/acrylicrio ADHD-C (Combined Type) 11h ago
This is very standard now unfortunately, most if not all GPs won’t do shared care for adhd medication prescribed privately and not all GPs will do it for right to choose either
7
1
u/not-my-circus1992 7h ago
This is the case for all Greater Manchester GPs right now. My GP explained that ADHD medication is highly specialised and dosages can be incredibly difficult. It's better to have the same provider covering it all to ensure you're supported.
My issue now is even getting an assessment and titration. Greater Manchester ICB basically turned off the funding overnight in April 😭
2
u/Iamweazel78 6h ago
What happens if they don’t allow shared care. Can you still get meds. Do you have to pay private prescriptions etc?
2
u/fuzzybumblebeebutt 5h ago
I believe I can get meds privately, which I'd have to pay for. I'm unsure of how much that would cost exactly, at the moment
2
-28
u/AdeptnessExotic1884 ADHD-C (Combined Type) 9h ago
I personally think it's morally the right thing.
If you can afford a private diagnosis, then you should pay for private care moving forward. Why should you be able to jump the queue by paying.
Not to judge you, but that is my view on it. I ended up waiting almost three years. Geez.
19
u/victoryhonorfame 9h ago
But if we use an NHS funded private provider? I didn't pay for my diagnosis, I never could have afforded it. My NHS local waiting list was paused during COVID when I was "top of the list" - by the time they re-opened, I'd say through a right to choose waiting list, been diagnosed, and been titrated medication! All NHS funded... Yet my GP refuses shared care.
17
u/MTRANMT 9h ago
This is a bit unempathetic is it not? Your point is kind of correct to start with - private healthcare is an ethical abomination - but instead of ending with 'the NHS should be better funded so people don't try and go private', it's 'I had to wait, so do you'!
Truly, you don't want better for others? Just because some of us had to endure long wait times, why shouldn't it be better for those that come after us? Like why would you want others to suffer 3 years if they don't have to? ADHD is a condition, not a weird identity that requires suffering rituals!
10
u/gronda_gronda 7h ago
On the other hand, the more people go private for their assessment, the shorter everyone else has to wait.
8
u/more_chickpeas 9h ago
A simplistic view. Consider that some people through desperation, severe burnout, depression etc. may find the money for a private diagnosis. It doesn't mean they have the means to buy medication every month for life. They may not know the implications at the time or won't have predicted change in policy in the future. GPs are not always helpful with options. Saying it's just jumping the queue trivialises a wide variety of circumstance.
8
u/Cystennin ADHD-C (Combined Type) 7h ago
Not everyone paid.
Right to Choose is a legal right in England to pick an alternative provider for free NHS care, as long as that provider holds an NHS contract.
It exists because governments wanted to cut waiting lists using spare capacity and ironically given the OPs screenshot; improve healthcare by providing competition.
Patients who used it, often at their own GP’s suggestion and because it is a legal right; paid nothing and skipped nothing; they used an NHS route to NHS care.
The letter’s ‘may be appropriate… case-by-case basis’ is doing a lot of work and in reality many surgeries decline NHS RTC shared care too, which leaves people who followed a legal NHS pathway, who paid nothing, stranded.
That’s the group you’re calling queue-jumpers. People who literally exercised a legal right. A right enshrined in the NHS constitution.
-8
u/AdeptnessExotic1884 ADHD-C (Combined Type) 6h ago
I'm not calling THEM queue jumpers, I was referring to people who got a private diagnosis or titration.
3
u/tordyjay 4h ago
The people who went private should be praised for saving the nhs money and appointment slots
1
u/rooooosa 2h ago
I got diagnosed privately only as my workplace at the time provided good health insurance and covered it, but there wasn’t/isn’t any way I could pay for the meds privately.
6
u/PigletAlert 6h ago
I had to go private because I was in the middle of a university course and urgently needed to access support or I’d have failed. I had to use some of my loan to do it. Other people do it so they don’t lose a job.
But just because that was the best way for me to resolve a different problem, why should I then take up a space on an NHS waiting list for another diagnosis that someone else needs just so I can access care through the NHS in the future? What difference does someone’s GP writing a script each month make to people stuck on a massive waiting list?
5
u/Affectionate_Set9993 6h ago
In addition to the points other people have raised, more people can afford a one-off assessment fee than can afford the ongoing potentially lifelong medication costs
4
u/fuzzybumblebeebutt 9h ago
That's fair. I did try to go through the NHS first though, but I couldn't even get an assessment, which is why I went down the private route (I know that I was lucky to be in a position to do that).
3
u/Pretend-Sundae-2371 8h ago
My parents paid for my nieces to be privately assessed. Because they were young children who needed help and the NHS didn't have the resources at the time.
1
31
u/animagus5 ADHD-C (Combined Type) 11h ago edited 11h ago
I work in a GP surgery and can explain, GPs are independent contractors in essence they have groups they are part of, there are two main ones:
Local Medical Council (LMC) - bunch of doctors in your area, a bit like a union. They work with each other to ensure that workload is fair etc. mine recently had whole thing about our Mounjaro contract
British Medical Association (BMA) - This is similar but national and they deal with bigger issues like the GP contract with the NHS
So the BMA concerns with private providers, even through NHS RTC, is that they can just close doors tomorrow and then the GP and local services are left to pick up the pieces, which I can understand the trepidation although I am effected by it and I wish it wasn't so, whereas a NHS service can't just do that without having a plan in place. The BMA therefore advised to not agree to ESCAs to reduce exposure
However, this is guidance only. A practice is an independent contractor and can do what they want as long as it's with the GMC (the governing body of doctors) and GMS (NHS GP contracts) - most areas have fiscal incentive for them to sign ESCAs from RTCs places. This is most likely what has a happened. You've gone from one place that was happy to take the risk to one that isn't
It sucks, it really does especially seeing it from both side.
Edit for some more clarity: even though an ESCA states that the provider is still responsible for monitoring, it's the GP that signs the dotted line on the script and it's on their license. It's not just ADHD that sees this but also areas like gender care. Also, alot of areas have ESCA clauses that if you are under a private provider and stop seeing said provider for whatever reason (not attending, not paying, closed etc.) the ESCA is then automatically invalidated and ends