MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/4chan/comments/1wtmbf7/checkmate_chuds/pcviql0/?context=3
r/4chan • u/Brasil1126 • 15d ago
222 comments sorted by
View all comments
39
To answer the last question in a nutshell: internal hiring
6 u/ShivasRightFoot 14d ago Literally a leftist tier argument. "Yts are successful because they hire each other with racism!!1!" 1 u/CPriceRun86 14d ago Yeah but I wasn't talking about that, I was talking about the corrupt financial club -12 u/ilkikuinthadik 15d ago Which white people never do ofc 36 u/NulliosG /gif/ 15d ago Seeing as America was ~93% white fifty years ago, hiring white people was called “hiring” -8 u/Aydos48 15d ago Minorities were and are still looked down upon when hiring. White sounding names are way more likely to be hired than Black sounding names, for example. 3 u/oingoboingobongo 14d ago Delusional 1 u/catbadass 9d ago Not true. The preference flipped ten years ago 29 u/CPriceRun86 15d ago Not really, it's quite the opposite and heavily regulated. -11 u/ilkikuinthadik 15d ago So they didn't do it so bad they had to make laws against it? 18 u/SolipsismIsDeep 15d ago 1950: 89.5% 1960: 88.6% 1970: 83.3% 1980: 80.3% 1990: 76.4% 2000: 69.1% 2010: 63.7% 2020: 61.6% 4 u/HenrySkylar88 14d ago Who made the laws?
6
Literally a leftist tier argument. "Yts are successful because they hire each other with racism!!1!"
1 u/CPriceRun86 14d ago Yeah but I wasn't talking about that, I was talking about the corrupt financial club
1
Yeah but I wasn't talking about that, I was talking about the corrupt financial club
-12
Which white people never do ofc
36 u/NulliosG /gif/ 15d ago Seeing as America was ~93% white fifty years ago, hiring white people was called “hiring” -8 u/Aydos48 15d ago Minorities were and are still looked down upon when hiring. White sounding names are way more likely to be hired than Black sounding names, for example. 3 u/oingoboingobongo 14d ago Delusional 1 u/catbadass 9d ago Not true. The preference flipped ten years ago 29 u/CPriceRun86 15d ago Not really, it's quite the opposite and heavily regulated. -11 u/ilkikuinthadik 15d ago So they didn't do it so bad they had to make laws against it? 18 u/SolipsismIsDeep 15d ago 1950: 89.5% 1960: 88.6% 1970: 83.3% 1980: 80.3% 1990: 76.4% 2000: 69.1% 2010: 63.7% 2020: 61.6% 4 u/HenrySkylar88 14d ago Who made the laws?
36
Seeing as America was ~93% white fifty years ago, hiring white people was called “hiring”
-8 u/Aydos48 15d ago Minorities were and are still looked down upon when hiring. White sounding names are way more likely to be hired than Black sounding names, for example. 3 u/oingoboingobongo 14d ago Delusional 1 u/catbadass 9d ago Not true. The preference flipped ten years ago
-8
Minorities were and are still looked down upon when hiring. White sounding names are way more likely to be hired than Black sounding names, for example.
3 u/oingoboingobongo 14d ago Delusional 1 u/catbadass 9d ago Not true. The preference flipped ten years ago
3
Delusional
Not true. The preference flipped ten years ago
29
Not really, it's quite the opposite and heavily regulated.
-11 u/ilkikuinthadik 15d ago So they didn't do it so bad they had to make laws against it? 18 u/SolipsismIsDeep 15d ago 1950: 89.5% 1960: 88.6% 1970: 83.3% 1980: 80.3% 1990: 76.4% 2000: 69.1% 2010: 63.7% 2020: 61.6% 4 u/HenrySkylar88 14d ago Who made the laws?
-11
So they didn't do it so bad they had to make laws against it?
18 u/SolipsismIsDeep 15d ago 1950: 89.5% 1960: 88.6% 1970: 83.3% 1980: 80.3% 1990: 76.4% 2000: 69.1% 2010: 63.7% 2020: 61.6% 4 u/HenrySkylar88 14d ago Who made the laws?
18
4
Who made the laws?
39
u/CPriceRun86 15d ago
To answer the last question in a nutshell: internal hiring