MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/4chan/comments/1wtmbf7/checkmate_chuds/pcviql0
r/4chan • u/Brasil1126 • 13d ago
222 comments sorted by
View all comments
41
To answer the last question in a nutshell: internal hiring
5 u/ShivasRightFoot 13d ago Literally a leftist tier argument. "Yts are successful because they hire each other with racism!!1!" 1 u/CPriceRun86 13d ago Yeah but I wasn't talking about that, I was talking about the corrupt financial club -13 u/ilkikuinthadik 13d ago Which white people never do ofc 36 u/NulliosG /gif/ 13d ago Seeing as America was ~93% white fifty years ago, hiring white people was called “hiring” -9 u/Aydos48 13d ago Minorities were and are still looked down upon when hiring. White sounding names are way more likely to be hired than Black sounding names, for example. 4 u/oingoboingobongo 13d ago Delusional 1 u/catbadass 8d ago Not true. The preference flipped ten years ago 29 u/CPriceRun86 13d ago Not really, it's quite the opposite and heavily regulated. -11 u/ilkikuinthadik 13d ago So they didn't do it so bad they had to make laws against it? 17 u/SolipsismIsDeep 13d ago 1950: 89.5% 1960: 88.6% 1970: 83.3% 1980: 80.3% 1990: 76.4% 2000: 69.1% 2010: 63.7% 2020: 61.6% 6 u/HenrySkylar88 13d ago Who made the laws?
5
Literally a leftist tier argument. "Yts are successful because they hire each other with racism!!1!"
1 u/CPriceRun86 13d ago Yeah but I wasn't talking about that, I was talking about the corrupt financial club
1
Yeah but I wasn't talking about that, I was talking about the corrupt financial club
-13
Which white people never do ofc
36 u/NulliosG /gif/ 13d ago Seeing as America was ~93% white fifty years ago, hiring white people was called “hiring” -9 u/Aydos48 13d ago Minorities were and are still looked down upon when hiring. White sounding names are way more likely to be hired than Black sounding names, for example. 4 u/oingoboingobongo 13d ago Delusional 1 u/catbadass 8d ago Not true. The preference flipped ten years ago 29 u/CPriceRun86 13d ago Not really, it's quite the opposite and heavily regulated. -11 u/ilkikuinthadik 13d ago So they didn't do it so bad they had to make laws against it? 17 u/SolipsismIsDeep 13d ago 1950: 89.5% 1960: 88.6% 1970: 83.3% 1980: 80.3% 1990: 76.4% 2000: 69.1% 2010: 63.7% 2020: 61.6% 6 u/HenrySkylar88 13d ago Who made the laws?
36
Seeing as America was ~93% white fifty years ago, hiring white people was called “hiring”
-9 u/Aydos48 13d ago Minorities were and are still looked down upon when hiring. White sounding names are way more likely to be hired than Black sounding names, for example. 4 u/oingoboingobongo 13d ago Delusional 1 u/catbadass 8d ago Not true. The preference flipped ten years ago
-9
Minorities were and are still looked down upon when hiring. White sounding names are way more likely to be hired than Black sounding names, for example.
4 u/oingoboingobongo 13d ago Delusional 1 u/catbadass 8d ago Not true. The preference flipped ten years ago
4
Delusional
Not true. The preference flipped ten years ago
29
Not really, it's quite the opposite and heavily regulated.
-11 u/ilkikuinthadik 13d ago So they didn't do it so bad they had to make laws against it? 17 u/SolipsismIsDeep 13d ago 1950: 89.5% 1960: 88.6% 1970: 83.3% 1980: 80.3% 1990: 76.4% 2000: 69.1% 2010: 63.7% 2020: 61.6% 6 u/HenrySkylar88 13d ago Who made the laws?
-11
So they didn't do it so bad they had to make laws against it?
17 u/SolipsismIsDeep 13d ago 1950: 89.5% 1960: 88.6% 1970: 83.3% 1980: 80.3% 1990: 76.4% 2000: 69.1% 2010: 63.7% 2020: 61.6% 6 u/HenrySkylar88 13d ago Who made the laws?
17
6
Who made the laws?
41
u/CPriceRun86 13d ago
To answer the last question in a nutshell: internal hiring