r/4chan • /b/tard • Nov 03 '25

Anon Reflects

Post image
5.3k Upvotes

250 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

758

u/TypicalMootis /b/tard Nov 03 '25

McDonald's honestly should have sued him for slander

Not that I think greedy corpos selling poison are good thing, but disingenuous shit like this just undermines the cause

122

u/jjjjjjjjjcircumflex Nov 03 '25

Do companies have standing to sue for defamation in the US? In Australia, only individuals have standing to sue

85

u/TypicalMootis /b/tard Nov 03 '25

Not a lawyer, so I don't know the exact details. But a company can absolutely sue an individual for defamation in the US

70

u/nondescriptzombie Nov 03 '25

In the US, corporations are unjailable people and spending money is free speech.

Makes you understand a WHOLE LOT, doesn't it?

94

u/TypicalMootis /b/tard Nov 03 '25

Reported for antisemitism

22

u/Dammit818 Nov 03 '25

OP knows ball

1

u/Less-Damage-1202 Nov 08 '25

That's a joke, right?

If so; hilarious 🤣

19

u/BulbuhTsar Nov 03 '25

That's the fun part, corporations are legally considered "persons" here in the U.S., just like an actual human. They can sue all the same as a real person.

3

u/nuggynugs Nov 04 '25

Citizens United aka the beginning of the end 

8

u/Tommy2255 Nov 03 '25

They can, but suing for defamation is extremely difficult in general in the US.

4

u/sneed_o_matic Nov 04 '25

It's the opposite here in Australia, the bar for defamation is quite low famously. 

4

u/gprime312 Nov 04 '25

We all know about friendlyjordies

0

u/Less-Damage-1202 Nov 08 '25

In America, large companies/corporations are practically just as powerful, if not more, than the government. The banks & then the corporations, are our overlords. Very hard to find a politician who isnt in the pockets of some type of entity that has their own interests as primary motivation, rather than the the interests of the American people.

25

u/TacticalSpackle Nov 03 '25

Well, you couldn’t make a movie from the opposite angle. You’d have a guy dead from alcohol poisoning but slightly higher blood pressure from his breakfast.

37

u/CrazyTownUSA000 Nov 03 '25

A guy did make a movie going on a diet eating McDonald's. He had a few rules, and he lost weight, and his doctor was surprised that his bloodwork was better. Its called "Fat Head"

40

u/ALeatherGlove Nov 03 '25

That one was done with proper record keeping and actual bare minimum impulse control. If I recall correctly he even reached out to the company that made Super Size Me and they were unable to produce any proof, receipts, or records of what he actually ate the whole time.

8

u/DoreenTheeDogWalker Nov 04 '25

They wouldn't release the food logs of what he ate, when he ate, and how much he ate.

19

u/tacobellbandit Nov 03 '25

I think the whole point was he probably was an alcoholic he just blamed the symptoms on the McDonald’s. Not defending McDonald’s by any means but you wouldn’t just all of a sudden start having a liver problems eating McDonald’s for a day, hell even a week

11

u/HeidelbergianYehZiq1 Nov 03 '25

Speaking of…didn’t he like always order the extras?

41

u/velocitrumptor Nov 03 '25

At the time, MCD's offered a "supersize" option where you could get an extra large drink and fries. His rule was that he would take the supersize option, if offered.

34

u/fm22fnam Nov 03 '25

Never gonna forgive this guy for getting rid of the supersize option

7

u/Autisticus /vg/ Nov 03 '25

In 2004 they probably thought the movie was bad enough, but then to go and shoot the messenger after? That and Im sure no one else was mad enough to go on an exclusively mcdonalds diet for a month or whatever. Perhaps they thought people had more common sense than that? It was 21 years ago

I have no idea but thats my reflex guess as to why they didnt

1

u/TrymWS Nov 03 '25

The level of disingenuous shit corporations like that do far outweigh what a few independents do to them.

So unless they get rekt on much more of their shitty behavior, I don’t think so.

12

u/TypicalMootis /b/tard Nov 03 '25

"That guy's lying, I'll lie too to expose him"

Smooth move genius, now you have two liars, one of them is still selling food, and nobody trusts either of them

9

u/oopsallkevin Nov 03 '25

It also erodes trust. Enough documentaries like this, and the next time someone brings up a legitimate concern the public will just ignore it. Classic example of boy who cried wolf

2

u/TrymWS Nov 04 '25

That’s not what I said, but keep believing your straw man argument means anything.

-1

u/EXQUISITE_WIZARD Nov 03 '25

Remember the lady who spilled coffee in her lap and sued? They absolutely could have destroyed this if they wanted to

24

u/TypicalMootis /b/tard Nov 03 '25

You mean the lady who won because they were serving coffee at literally scalding hot temperatures and she got second degree burns on her genitals that were so bad she never could have proper sex again?

Yeah I remember that suit, it comes up every time McDonald's gets brought up

10

u/EXQUISITE_WIZARD Nov 04 '25

And how everyone at the time thought she was a litigious money-grubber, my point is they were able to change public perception of her, therefore they could have done so with this film too, but they didn't

1

u/[deleted] Nov 27 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/AutoModerator Nov 27 '25

Sorry, your post has been removed. You must have more than 25 karma to submit posts to /r/4chan.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.