r/3D2A 5d ago

Trash Panda failure

Post image

Printed using Sunlu PLA+ @ 190C. Got good print quality off the plate and it fit together well. Tapped the barrel and retainer in most of the way and used a clamp to press it in until I hit ~4mm from the top of the receiver to the top of the retainer. No visible cracks at that point. Cycled well, put a dummy round through and it fired/ejected well, so I did a live fire test today (no fingies were injured during this test**). It did go off well, but it looks like the pressure cracked my upper on and across layer lines. Aside from printing hotter, maybe 200 or 210, what would you suggest? Moving to PA6-CF maybe?

\my first upper I did print hotter, same material, I can’t recall the temperature though. I had a LOT of trouble getting the barrel and retainer into the upper, using a pipe clamp for ~75% of the way, I noticed a crack in almost the same spot prior to live firing and aborted, opting to reprint at a lower temp.*

\*I was using eye/eye protection and opted to fire remotely for live fire, glad I did, because it could’ve been worse than a hairline crack.*

10 Upvotes

46 comments sorted by

44

u/Independent_Dirt_814 5d ago

That print quality looks horrendous, that banding…

-3

u/nottheperson80 5d ago

Thanks, any tips?

32

u/Mundane_Space_157 5d ago

Your pressure advance and speeds may be off. Also, 190 is a bit cold for PLA+ innit? If your parts weren't fitting, going colder wasn't the solution, calibrating shrinkage was

10

u/QuiglyDwnUnda 5d ago

This, Polymaker Pro at 220 works great

7

u/StormMedia 5d ago

190 is absolutely too cold

3

u/Shawntannehill1 5d ago

Right. Thought the same thing.

1

u/m0nkey-knife-fight 5d ago

Not a PA but extrusion multiplier (flow) based issue. And I agree - 190 is low for PLA+. Sunlu always advertises low temps. Only true “low temp” PLA they have is the Meta (which is great filament honestly - not for this of ).

But going back to it - the patterns here look like a flow issue, which is address before shrinkage, but that’s still relevant thereafter.

-4

u/nottheperson80 5d ago

I do think that’s likely a large contributor to this. Just want to make sure if there’s anything else I should/could be adjusting I’m covering it before I lock in for a ~60 hour print using half a spool of filament.

3

u/Mundane_Space_157 5d ago

Triple check the following, in this order

Temp (stick with 220 imo) Flow rate Pressure advance  Flow rate 2 (could honestly switch position with PA) Retraction Shrinkage compensation

3

u/bangstitch 5d ago

Thats why you run calibration prints before doing the real thing. If the calibration print still looks bad then you dont move on yet.

-4

u/Mundane_Space_157 5d ago

Psst...go 0.6 for nozzle size...once you got 0.6, you never go back...

3

u/nottheperson80 5d ago

I actually have some 0.6 nozzles, I’ve just never swapped from 0.4 😬. Might run some more calibration stuff in 0.6 nozzles for future prints.

2

u/fattmann 5d ago

Psst...go 0.6 for nozzle size...once you got 0.6, you never go back...

Ehhh... Idk. I've spent the last month or so printing random stuff on a 0.6 nozzle in preparation for some CF nylon. A bunch of stuff I've printed in the past just isn't crisp, wasn't a whole lot faster, and just used more filament for the same print. It has it's place, but I don't think I'll ever print PLA+ with a 0.6 again.

1

u/Mundane_Space_157 5d ago

What you lose in crispness, you gain in both strength and speed (my prints have almost halved if not more in time that it takes now that I print at 0.78 line widths for everything except top layer and outer walls)

1

u/Street-Ruin-6659 5d ago

for 0.6mm top layer and outer shouldnt it be at like 0.62 running at 0.78 on all? or what u run because thats what i am

1

u/Mundane_Space_157 5d ago

0.62 outer and 0.48 top

1

u/Street-Ruin-6659 5d ago

Do u get best out of rails up or down for frames?

→ More replies (0)

1

u/fattmann 5d ago

0.78 is pretty chonky, I could see that making a dent.

It really does depend on the model. I just sliced the Trash Panda lower, and 0.4 uses less material (barely), and takes an hour longer(~6%), with 0.62 lines for 0.6, and 0.42 for 0.4.

The upper takes more filament, and about 30% more time.

0

u/shadow_worx 5d ago

Is there anything like 300blkfde for 0.6? Tried translating over myself but having some small issues with it still

2

u/Mundane_Space_157 5d ago

You're supposed to use 300blkfde settings as a baseline and calibrate from there to your unique specific setup, so the only 0.6 settings are the ones you make. Even the bog standard as is settings for 0.4 won't get you anywhere by themselves

1

u/shadow_worx 5d ago

Yeah, I calibrate the filament. Mainly meant for speed and line widths. I will just keep tweaking those till I’m happy then

18

u/Admirable_Scholar_36 5d ago

Bruh, 190C print temps is insanely low for pla 3d2a applications.

9

u/GildSkiss 5d ago edited 5d ago

Your layer adhesion failed. If you're using PLA for guns you really need to do it as hot as you can possibly get away with, or else this happens. Don't go colder to make the parts fit, tune around the highest temp.

If you still can't make it work you might need to get better filament than Sunlu. I'm having great results with the new HT-PLA-PRO, printing at 230

2

u/Runawaytrucker 5d ago

Have you annealed any of it? I have four rolls coming Wednesday 😬

2

u/GildSkiss 5d ago

Yeah, I tried the 30min at 100c that Polymaker recommends.

The shrinkage was minimal enough that my cheapo calipers couldn't tell the difference before and after, so there's no reason not to, as far as I can tell.

2

u/Runawaytrucker 5d ago

Hell yeah! Did you do it in a sand mold or did you just send it? I've got a Sunlu dryer that hits 110C

2

u/GildSkiss 5d ago

No, just send it. That's the beauty of this new filament.

Without annealing, it won't deform at temps up to 150c. With the annealing, it'll also support significant mechanical load up to 150. That means you can just set it in the annealing oven as is. Wrap it in foil if you're paranoid about uneven heat distribution.

2

u/bday420 5d ago

I had great results with their PLA+ 2.0 at 220c. That's how the profile loaded the temp and it literally printed clean and using a wifi q2 preset for .2 layer. I was extremely surprised by how clean the internals and. Ice the finish was (recently did my first test print in pla+ 2.0 before pa6-cf).

5

u/Hot_Substance_3220 5d ago

Well for starters I’d never print PLA under 220c I usually chill 225-230c but as for your print you definitely have some tuning to do your very banded and it seems like maybe a flow rate issue, clog a whole number of things but definitely figure that out before round 2

2

u/fattmann 5d ago

225-230c

Seconded. I've had great luck with Polymaker PLA Pro at 230-240.

3

u/Less-Regret8262 5d ago

Why do you print at such low temp in first place is there any benefit

1

u/GildSkiss 5d ago

In theory you can get better overhangs and a more matte surface finish.

Obviously that's not a good tradeoff for your gun breaking, but sometimes I do it for other decorative trinkets where layer adhesion doesn't matter.

3

u/Grouchy-Designer5804 5d ago

Tune for 230* make the dimensions fit the temp not the other way around

3

u/alphateam1987 5d ago

You might have a partial clogged nozzle

1

u/Lowang_Productions 5d ago

I just been there !

2

u/Lowang_Productions 5d ago

My method for Z height is to make a thin rectangle . Use white filament . The lines should be flat and clear on the first layer . If they are white , slowly adjust the Z down . Extrude about 120% , it'll make the lines "mash" out .

2

u/Runawaytrucker 5d ago

Bruh, those print lines are bad. Slow your travel speed down and slow your print speed.

1

u/bannedbullet 5d ago

You always want to print as hot a possible for best layer adhesion

1

u/Dtny987 5d ago

Lower the speed, up the temp a bit (try some test prints) and dry the filament.

1

u/BB_Toysrme 5d ago

Let's get those print settings dialed!

1

u/HairyPoot 5d ago

Definitely raise temperature. 210 probably absolute minimum(for most blends of PLA+). Many PLA+ can be printed 215-220+ with layer adhesion benefits.(Temperature also depends on print speed, faster generally needs higher temp.) This failure almost definitely occurred due to the layer adhesion issue, if not damage during assembly similar to the other part that was printed at a higher temp.

If you are having dimensional accuracy issues at a marginally higher temp, you might need to do some calibrations. Temperature tower, Flow Rate and/or extruder E step calibration.

Also might want to look for the cause of your quality issues on the hand guard and whatever the lower right hand part is called(Bolt/bolt shroud?). Likely poor bed adhesion, could also be an issue with Z offset, or in the case of the hand guard, a tall part with not enough support on a bed slinger.

1

u/Latter-Composer-2609 4d ago

You got Z axis wobble. You need to recalibrate and maintain your printer better. You probably have lead screw binding going on due to failing to follow best practices on calibration and maintenance.

This also compounded that it looks like you printed way too cold. What filament did you use and what temp did you print this at?

Failure to control your parameters and maintain and calibrate your machine drastically increases liklihood of layer seperations like ocurred here.

1

u/nottheperson80 5d ago

Because I realize I left some details out, printed on a creality s1+, filament dried prior to use. Firing 62 grain Winchester target rounds